A good pun is its own reword: Can Large Language Models Understand Puns?
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Puns play a vital role in academic research due to their distinct structure and clear definition, which aid in the comprehensive analysis of linguistic humor.
- However, the understanding of puns in large language models (LLMs) has not been thoroughly examined, limiting their use in creative writing and humor creation.
- This paper explores the capabilities of LLMs in understanding puns by leveraging three popular tasks: pun recognition, explanation, and generation.
Plain English Explanation
Puns, which are plays on words with double meanings, are important in academic research because they help analyze how language and humor work. However, large language models have not been studied extensively when it comes to understanding puns. This paper looks at how well these models can recognize, explain, and generate puns. The researchers use new evaluation methods and metrics that are better suited to how these models learn and process information, to get a more accurate understanding of their pun capabilities. Their findings reveal that LLMs struggle with certain aspects of pun comprehension, which limits their usefulness in creative writing and humor creation.
Technical Explanation
The research paper systematically evaluates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in understanding puns by leveraging three popular tasks: pun recognition, explanation, and generation. In addition to adopting the automated evaluation metrics from prior research, the authors introduce new evaluation methods and metrics that are better suited to the in-context learning paradigm of LLMs.
These new metrics offer a more rigorous assessment of an LLM's ability to understand puns and align more closely with human cognition than previous metrics. The findings reveal the lazy pun generation pattern and identify the primary challenges LLMs encounter in understanding puns, such as the need for supervised knowledge to fully grasp the nuances of linguistic humor.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights the limitations of current LLM evaluation methods in capturing the nuances of pun understanding, and proposes new metrics that better align with human cognition. However, the paper does not address the potential biases or errors that may be present in the new evaluation methods, which could impact the reliability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the understanding of puns in LLMs, without examining the broader implications for language modeling in education or other creative applications. Further research could explore the transferability of pun understanding to other forms of linguistic creativity and humor.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the current limitations of LLMs in understanding puns, a crucial aspect of linguistic humor. The introduction of new evaluation methods and metrics offers a more rigorous assessment of LLM capabilities, paving the way for further advancements in this area. While the findings highlight the challenges LLMs face in comprehending puns, the research also underscores the importance of continued efforts to enhance the language understanding capabilities of these models, which could have significant implications for creative writing, humor generation, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
A good pun is its own reword: Can Large Language Models Understand Puns?
Zhijun Xu, Siyu Yuan, Lingjie Chen, Deqing Yang
Puns play a vital role in academic research due to their distinct structure and clear definition, which aid in the comprehensive analysis of linguistic humor. However, the understanding of puns in large language models (LLMs) has not been thoroughly examined, limiting their use in creative writing and humor creation. In this paper, we leverage three popular tasks, i.e., pun recognition, explanation and generation to systematically evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in pun understanding. In addition to adopting the automated evaluation metrics from prior research, we introduce new evaluation methods and metrics that are better suited to the in-context learning paradigm of LLMs. These new metrics offer a more rigorous assessment of an LLM's ability to understand puns and align more closely with human cognition than previous metrics. Our findings reveal the lazy pun generation pattern and identify the primary challenges LLMs encounter in understanding puns.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Can Pre-trained Language Models Understand Chinese Humor?
Yuyan Chen, Zhixu Li, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Bang Liu, Yunwen Chen
Humor understanding is an important and challenging research in natural language processing. As the popularity of pre-trained language models (PLMs), some recent work makes preliminary attempts to adopt PLMs for humor recognition and generation. However, these simple attempts do not substantially answer the question: {em whether PLMs are capable of humor understanding?} This paper is the first work that systematically investigates the humor understanding ability of PLMs. For this purpose, a comprehensive framework with three evaluation steps and four evaluation tasks is designed. We also construct a comprehensive Chinese humor dataset, which can fully meet all the data requirements of the proposed evaluation framework. Our empirical study on the Chinese humor dataset yields some valuable observations, which are of great guiding value for future optimization of PLMs in humor understanding and generation.
Read more7/8/2024
💬
0
A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Hum4n L4ngu4ge and the W0rld behind W0rds?
Evelina Leivada, Gary Marcus, Fritz Gunther, Elliot Murphy
Modern Artificial Intelligence applications show great potential for language-related tasks that rely on next-word prediction. The current generation of Large Language Models (LLMs) have been linked to claims about human-like linguistic performance and their applications are hailed both as a step towards artificial general intelligence and as a major advance in understanding the cognitive, and even neural basis of human language. To assess these claims, first we analyze the contribution of LLMs as theoretically informative representations of a target cognitive system vs. atheoretical mechanistic tools. Second, we evaluate the models' ability to see the bigger picture, through top-down feedback from higher levels of processing, which requires grounding in previous expectations and past world experience. We hypothesize that since models lack grounded cognition, they cannot take advantage of these features and instead solely rely on fixed associations between represented words and word vectors. To assess this, we designed and ran a novel 'leet task' (l33t t4sk), which requires decoding sentences in which letters are systematically replaced by numbers. The results suggest that humans excel in this task whereas models struggle, confirming our hypothesis. We interpret the results by identifying the key abilities that are still missing from the current state of development of these models, which require solutions that go beyond increased system scaling.
Read more9/5/2024
0
Can large language models understand uncommon meanings of common words?
Jinyang Wu, Feihu Che, Xinxin Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Ruihan Jin, Shuai Nie, Pengpeng Shao, Jianhua Tao
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have shown significant advancements across diverse natural language understanding (NLU) tasks, including intelligent dialogue and autonomous agents. Yet, lacking widely acknowledged testing mechanisms, answering `whether LLMs are stochastic parrots or genuinely comprehend the world' remains unclear, fostering numerous studies and sparking heated debates. Prevailing research mainly focuses on surface-level NLU, neglecting fine-grained explorations. However, such explorations are crucial for understanding their unique comprehension mechanisms, aligning with human cognition, and finally enhancing LLMs' general NLU capacities. To address this gap, our study delves into LLMs' nuanced semantic comprehension capabilities, particularly regarding common words with uncommon meanings. The idea stems from foundational principles of human communication within psychology, which underscore accurate shared understandings of word semantics. Specifically, this paper presents the innovative construction of a Lexical Semantic Comprehension (LeSC) dataset with novel evaluation metrics, the first benchmark encompassing both fine-grained and cross-lingual dimensions. Introducing models of both open-source and closed-source, varied scales and architectures, our extensive empirical experiments demonstrate the inferior performance of existing models in this basic lexical-meaning understanding task. Notably, even the state-of-the-art LLMs GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 lag behind 16-year-old humans by 3.9% and 22.3%, respectively. Additionally, multiple advanced prompting techniques and retrieval-augmented generation are also introduced to help alleviate this trouble, yet limitations persist. By highlighting the above critical shortcomings, this research motivates further investigation and offers novel insights for developing more intelligent LLMs.
Read more5/10/2024