Can We Rely on LLM Agents to Draft Long-Horizon Plans? Let's Take TravelPlanner as an Example
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in drafting long-horizon plans, using the TravelPlanner task as an example.
- The researchers investigate whether LLMs can be relied upon to generate high-quality, long-term travel plans that consider various constraints and objectives.
- The study involves training and evaluating an LLM-based agent, TravelPlanner, on a dataset of real-world travel itineraries.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether we can trust large AI language models to create detailed, long-term travel plans that take into account various factors. The researchers trained an AI system called TravelPlanner on a dataset of real travel itineraries and then tested its ability to generate high-quality, multi-day travel plans that meet specific goals and constraints.
This is an important question because if these powerful language models can be relied upon for complex, long-horizon planning tasks, it could open up new possibilities for AI-assisted decision making and task automation. However, it's also crucial to understand the limitations of these models to ensure they are used appropriately and safely.
Technical Explanation
The researchers trained a large language model-based agent, TravelPlanner, on a dataset of real-world travel itineraries. The goal was to evaluate whether this AI system could generate high-quality, long-horizon travel plans that consider factors like budget, time constraints, and traveler preferences.
The TravelPlanner model was trained using a prompt-based approach, where it was given a prompt describing the travel planning objectives and constraints, and asked to generate a detailed multi-day itinerary in response. The researchers then evaluated the quality and feasibility of the generated plans by having human raters assess them.
The results showed that while TravelPlanner was able to generate plausible travel plans, the quality and consistency of the plans varied significantly. The model struggled to maintain coherence and adhere to constraints over long planning horizons, suggesting that current LLMs may not be sufficient for reliably drafting complex, long-term plans.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important caveats about relying on LLMs for long-horizon planning tasks. While the TravelPlanner model demonstrated some capability in generating travel plans, the inconsistency and constraint violations in the plans suggest that these models may not be ready for mission-critical planning applications.
One limitation of the study is that it only evaluated plan quality through human ratings, rather than actually executing the plans and measuring real-world outcomes. Additionally, the dataset of travel itineraries used for training may not have been representative of the full complexity of real-world travel planning.
Further research is needed to better understand the underlying limitations of LLMs when it comes to long-term planning and decision making. Exploring hybrid approaches that combine LLMs with other planning and reasoning techniques may be a promising direction for enhancing the capabilities of AI systems in this domain.
Conclusion
This paper provides a thought-provoking examination of the capabilities and limitations of large language models in the context of long-horizon planning tasks, using the TravelPlanner system as a case study. While LLMs show promise in generating plausible plans, the inconsistencies and constraint violations observed in the study suggest that we cannot yet fully rely on these models for critical decision-making and planning applications.
The findings underscore the importance of carefully evaluating the abilities and shortcomings of AI systems, especially when they are being considered for high-stakes applications. As the use of LLMs continues to expand, it will be crucial to develop a deeper understanding of their capabilities and limitations to ensure they are deployed responsibly and effectively.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Can We Rely on LLM Agents to Draft Long-Horizon Plans? Let's Take TravelPlanner as an Example
Yanan Chen, Ali Pesaranghader, Tanmana Sadhu, Dong Hoon Yi
Large language models (LLMs) have brought autonomous agents closer to artificial general intelligence (AGI) due to their promising generalization and emergent capabilities. There is, however, a lack of studies on how LLM-based agents behave, why they could potentially fail, and how to improve them, particularly in demanding real-world planning tasks. In this paper, as an effort to fill the gap, we present our study using a realistic benchmark, TravelPlanner, where an agent must meet multiple constraints to generate accurate plans. We leverage this benchmark to address four key research questions: (1) are LLM agents robust enough to lengthy and noisy contexts when it comes to reasoning and planning? (2) can few-shot prompting adversely impact the performance of LLM agents in scenarios with long context? (3) can we rely on refinement to improve plans, and (4) can fine-tuning LLMs with both positive and negative feedback lead to further improvement? Our comprehensive experiments indicate that, firstly, LLMs often fail to attend to crucial parts of a long context, despite their ability to handle extensive reference information and few-shot examples; secondly, they still struggle with analyzing the long plans and cannot provide accurate feedback for refinement; thirdly, we propose Feedback-Aware Fine-Tuning (FAFT), which leverages both positive and negative feedback, resulting in substantial gains over Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Our findings offer in-depth insights to the community on various aspects related to real-world planning applications.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Smart Language Agents in Real-World Planning
Annabelle Miin, Timothy Wei
Comprehensive planning agents have been a long term goal in the field of artificial intelligence. Recent innovations in Natural Language Processing have yielded success through the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs). We seek to improve the travel-planning capability of such LLMs by extending upon the work of the previous paper TravelPlanner. Our objective is to explore a new method of using LLMs to improve the travel planning experience. We focus specifically on the sole-planning mode of travel planning; that is, the agent is given necessary reference information, and its goal is to create a comprehensive plan from the reference information. While this does not simulate the real-world we feel that an optimization of the sole-planning capability of a travel planning agent will still be able to enhance the overall user experience. We propose a semi-automated prompt generation framework which combines the LLM-automated prompt and human-in-the-loop to iteratively refine the prompt to improve the LLM performance. Our result shows that LLM automated prompt has its limitations and human-in-the-loop greatly improves the performance by $139%$ with one single iteration.
Read more7/30/2024
0
LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks
Subbarao Kambhampati, Karthik Valmeekam, Lin Guan, Mudit Verma, Kaya Stechly, Siddhant Bhambri, Lucas Saldyt, Anil Murthy
There is considerable confusion about the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in planning and reasoning tasks. On one side are over-optimistic claims that LLMs can indeed do these tasks with just the right prompting or self-verification strategies. On the other side are perhaps over-pessimistic claims that all that LLMs are good for in planning/reasoning tasks are as mere translators of the problem specification from one syntactic format to another, and ship the problem off to external symbolic solvers. In this position paper, we take the view that both these extremes are misguided. We argue that auto-regressive LLMs cannot, by themselves, do planning or self-verification (which is after all a form of reasoning), and shed some light on the reasons for misunderstandings in the literature. We will also argue that LLMs should be viewed as universal approximate knowledge sources that have much more meaningful roles to play in planning/reasoning tasks beyond simple front-end/back-end format translators. We present a vision of {bf LLM-Modulo Frameworks} that combine the strengths of LLMs with external model-based verifiers in a tighter bi-directional interaction regime. We will show how the models driving the external verifiers themselves can be acquired with the help of LLMs. We will also argue that rather than simply pipelining LLMs and symbolic components, this LLM-Modulo Framework provides a better neuro-symbolic approach that offers tighter integration between LLMs and symbolic components, and allows extending the scope of model-based planning/reasoning regimes towards more flexible knowledge, problem and preference specifications.
Read more6/13/2024
š¬
0
LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning
Haoming Li, Zhaoliang Chen, Jonathan Zhang, Fei Liu
Effective planning is essential for the success of any task, from organizing a vacation to routing autonomous vehicles and developing corporate strategies. It involves setting goals, formulating plans, and allocating resources to achieve them. LLMs are particularly well-suited for automated planning due to their strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning. They can deduce a sequence of actions needed to achieve a goal from a given state and identify an effective course of action. However, it is frequently observed that plans generated through direct prompting often fail upon execution. Our survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models, focusing on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning. Through this study, we explore how LLMs transform AI planning and provide unique insights into the future of LM-assisted planning.
Read more9/4/2024