Smart Language Agents in Real-World Planning

Read original: arXiv:2407.19667 - Published 7/30/2024 by Annabelle Miin, Timothy Wei
Total Score

0

Smart Language Agents in Real-World Planning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the use of smart language agents for real-world planning tasks.
  • It explores ways to improve the planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
  • The research aims to make LLMs more effective at handling complex, multi-step planning problems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how we can make language models better at planning for real-world tasks. These models are good at understanding and generating human language, but they often struggle with complex, multi-step planning problems, like travel planning.

The researchers propose a framework to improve the planning capabilities of these language models. The key idea is to give the models more information about the steps involved in a plan, and to allow them to proactively ask questions to clarify any uncertainties. This helps the models build a more detailed and accurate understanding of the planning problem.

By making language models better at planning, the researchers hope to create more capable virtual assistants that can help people with complex, real-world tasks like travel planning or home organization.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework for improving the planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The key components of the framework are:

  1. Planning-Aware Pre-training: The researchers pre-train the LLM on a diverse set of planning-related tasks, such as breaking down high-level goals into sub-tasks, sequencing actions, and reasoning about causal relationships.

  2. Multi-Phase Planning: During inference, the model goes through several phases of planning, including understanding the problem, asking clarifying questions, generating a plan, and evaluating the plan.

  3. Hybrid Planning-Execution: The model can interleave planning and execution, allowing it to adapt the plan based on new information or feedback during the process.

The researchers evaluate their framework on a travel planning benchmark, where the model needs to plan a complete trip given natural language instructions. The results show that the framework significantly improves the planning performance of the LLM compared to a standard model.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to improving the planning capabilities of LLMs, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  • The experiments focus on a specific domain (travel planning) and it's unclear how well the framework would generalize to other real-world planning tasks.
  • The model still struggles with certain types of planning problems, such as those involving complex logical reasoning or long-term dependencies.
  • The paper does not address potential ethical concerns around the use of language models for high-stakes planning tasks, such as financial planning or medical decision-making.

Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of the framework, address its limitations, and consider the societal implications of deploying such systems in the real world.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework for enhancing the planning capabilities of large language models, with the goal of creating more capable virtual assistants that can help people with complex, real-world tasks. The key innovations include planning-aware pre-training, multi-phase planning, and hybrid planning-execution.

The results on a travel planning benchmark are promising, but the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further work. Addressing these challenges could lead to significant advancements in the field of AI-assisted planning and decision-making, with important implications for a wide range of real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Smart Language Agents in Real-World Planning
Total Score

0

Smart Language Agents in Real-World Planning

Annabelle Miin, Timothy Wei

Comprehensive planning agents have been a long term goal in the field of artificial intelligence. Recent innovations in Natural Language Processing have yielded success through the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs). We seek to improve the travel-planning capability of such LLMs by extending upon the work of the previous paper TravelPlanner. Our objective is to explore a new method of using LLMs to improve the travel planning experience. We focus specifically on the sole-planning mode of travel planning; that is, the agent is given necessary reference information, and its goal is to create a comprehensive plan from the reference information. While this does not simulate the real-world we feel that an optimization of the sole-planning capability of a travel planning agent will still be able to enhance the overall user experience. We propose a semi-automated prompt generation framework which combines the LLM-automated prompt and human-in-the-loop to iteratively refine the prompt to improve the LLM performance. Our result shows that LLM automated prompt has its limitations and human-in-the-loop greatly improves the performance by $139%$ with one single iteration.

Read more

7/30/2024

💬

Total Score

0

TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents

Jian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu, Renze Lou, Yuandong Tian, Yanghua Xiao, Yu Su

Planning has been part of the core pursuit for artificial intelligence since its conception, but earlier AI agents mostly focused on constrained settings because many of the cognitive substrates necessary for human-level planning have been lacking. Recently, language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown interesting capabilities such as tool use and reasoning. Are these language agents capable of planning in more complex settings that are out of the reach of prior AI agents? To advance this investigation, we propose TravelPlanner, a new planning benchmark that focuses on travel planning, a common real-world planning scenario. It provides a rich sandbox environment, various tools for accessing nearly four million data records, and 1,225 meticulously curated planning intents and reference plans. Comprehensive evaluations show that the current language agents are not yet capable of handling such complex planning tasks-even GPT-4 only achieves a success rate of 0.6%. Language agents struggle to stay on task, use the right tools to collect information, or keep track of multiple constraints. However, we note that the mere possibility for language agents to tackle such a complex problem is in itself non-trivial progress. TravelPlanner provides a challenging yet meaningful testbed for future language agents.

Read more

6/26/2024

💬

Total Score

0

LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning

Haoming Li, Zhaoliang Chen, Jonathan Zhang, Fei Liu

Effective planning is essential for the success of any task, from organizing a vacation to routing autonomous vehicles and developing corporate strategies. It involves setting goals, formulating plans, and allocating resources to achieve them. LLMs are particularly well-suited for automated planning due to their strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning. They can deduce a sequence of actions needed to achieve a goal from a given state and identify an effective course of action. However, it is frequently observed that plans generated through direct prompting often fail upon execution. Our survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models, focusing on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning. Through this study, we explore how LLMs transform AI planning and provide unique insights into the future of LM-assisted planning.

Read more

9/4/2024

Can We Rely on LLM Agents to Draft Long-Horizon Plans? Let's Take TravelPlanner as an Example
Total Score

0

Can We Rely on LLM Agents to Draft Long-Horizon Plans? Let's Take TravelPlanner as an Example

Yanan Chen, Ali Pesaranghader, Tanmana Sadhu, Dong Hoon Yi

Large language models (LLMs) have brought autonomous agents closer to artificial general intelligence (AGI) due to their promising generalization and emergent capabilities. There is, however, a lack of studies on how LLM-based agents behave, why they could potentially fail, and how to improve them, particularly in demanding real-world planning tasks. In this paper, as an effort to fill the gap, we present our study using a realistic benchmark, TravelPlanner, where an agent must meet multiple constraints to generate accurate plans. We leverage this benchmark to address four key research questions: (1) are LLM agents robust enough to lengthy and noisy contexts when it comes to reasoning and planning? (2) can few-shot prompting adversely impact the performance of LLM agents in scenarios with long context? (3) can we rely on refinement to improve plans, and (4) can fine-tuning LLMs with both positive and negative feedback lead to further improvement? Our comprehensive experiments indicate that, firstly, LLMs often fail to attend to crucial parts of a long context, despite their ability to handle extensive reference information and few-shot examples; secondly, they still struggle with analyzing the long plans and cannot provide accurate feedback for refinement; thirdly, we propose Feedback-Aware Fine-Tuning (FAFT), which leverages both positive and negative feedback, resulting in substantial gains over Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Our findings offer in-depth insights to the community on various aspects related to real-world planning applications.

Read more

8/13/2024