Canonical Decision Diagrams Modulo Theories

Overview

• Decision diagrams (DDs) are powerful tools for representing propositional formulas effectively, which are widely used in formal verification and knowledge compilation.
• Some forms of DDs, like Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (OBDDs) and Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDDs), are canonical, meaning they uniquely represent equivalence classes of formulas.
• Attempts have been made to extend the use of DDs to the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) level, but these techniques have limitations, such as being theory-specific and not producing theory-canonical T-DDs.
• This paper presents a novel, general technique to leverage DDs at the SMT level, overcoming these limitations.

Plain English Explanation

Decision diagrams (DDs) are a way to represent propositional formulas in a compact and efficient manner. They are widely used in fields like formal verification and knowledge compilation. Some types of DDs, like OBDDs and SDDs, are "canonical," meaning they have a unique representation for each equivalence class of formulas.

Researchers have tried to extend the use of DDs to a more powerful logical framework called Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), which can handle more complex logical statements. However, these attempts have had limitations - for example, they may only work for specific theories, or the DDs they produce may not uniquely represent all the valid or inconsistent formulas in the theory.

In this paper, the authors present a new, more general technique for using DDs at the SMT level. Their approach has several advantages: it's easy to implement, it works for any theory or combination of theories supported by the SMT solver, and it can produce theory-canonical T-DDs (DDs that uniquely represent equivalence classes of formulas in the theory) if the underlying propositional DD is canonical.

The authors have implemented a prototype tool that applies their technique to both T-OBDDs and T-SDDs, using OBDD and SDD packages along with the MathSAT SMT solver. Their initial tests suggest the approach is effective.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel technique for leveraging decision diagrams (DDs) to represent formulas at the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) level. This is an extension of the use of canonical DDs, like OBDDs and SDDs, which can uniquely represent equivalence classes of propositional formulas.

The authors' approach has several key advantages over previous attempts to use DDs for SMT:

1. It is theory-agnostic and can work with any theory or combination of theories supported by the underlying AllSMT solver.
2. It produces theory-canonical T-DDs, which uniquely represent T-equivalence classes of formulas, if the underlying propositional DD is canonical.
3. It is easy to implement, as it can be built on top of an existing AllSMT solver and DD package, used as black boxes.

The authors have implemented a prototype tool that applies their technique to both T-OBDDs and T-SDDs, using OBDD and SDD packages along with the MathSAT SMT solver. The preliminary empirical evaluation suggests the effectiveness of their approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to extending the use of canonical DDs to the SMT level, addressing the limitations of previous attempts. However, a few potential areas for further research or consideration are:

1. The paper focuses on the theoretical and implementation aspects, but does not provide a comprehensive empirical evaluation across a wide range of benchmarks and theories. More extensive testing would help validate the practical benefits of the approach.
2. The authors mention that their technique produces theory-canonical T-DDs if the underlying propositional DD is canonical. It would be valuable to understand the specific conditions required for this property to hold, and whether there are any limitations or caveats.
3. The paper does not discuss the computational complexity or performance characteristics of the proposed technique compared to other SMT approaches. Understanding the tradeoffs, such as memory usage or query-answering time, would help users make informed decisions about when to apply this method.
4. While the authors claim the technique is easy to implement, a more detailed discussion of the implementation process and potential challenges would be helpful for researchers interested in reproducing or building upon this work.

Overall, the paper presents a novel and promising direction for extending the benefits of canonical DDs to the SMT domain, but further research and empirical evaluation would help strengthen the claims and guide future developments in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel, general technique for leveraging decision diagrams (DDs) at the Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) level. The approach addresses limitations of previous attempts, such as being theory-specific and not producing theory-canonical T-DDs.

The key advantages of the authors' technique are that it is theory-agnostic, can produce theory-canonical T-DDs if the underlying propositional DD is canonical, and is relatively easy to implement on top of an existing AllSMT solver and DD package.

The authors have implemented a prototype tool that applies their method to both T-OBDDs and T-SDDs, with promising preliminary results. While further research and evaluation are needed, this work represents a significant step forward in extending the powerful capabilities of canonical DDs to the more expressive SMT domain.