A Cause-Effect Look at Alleviating Hallucination of Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation
2404.03491
0
0
Abstract
Empowered by the large-scale pretrained language models, existing dialogue systems have demonstrated impressive performance conducting fluent and natural-sounding conversations. However, they are still plagued by the hallucination problem, causing unpredictable factual errors in the generated responses. Recently, knowledge-grounded dialogue generation models, that intentionally invoke external knowledge resources to more informative responses, are also proven to be effective in reducing hallucination. Following the idea of getting high-quality knowledge, a few efforts have achieved pretty good performance on this issue. As some inevitable knowledge noises may also lead to hallucinations, it is emergent to investigate the reason and future directions for building noise-tolerant methods in KGD tasks. In this paper, we analyze the causal story behind this problem with counterfactual reasoning methods. Based on the causal effect analysis, we propose a possible solution for alleviating the hallucination in KGD by exploiting the dialogue-knowledge interaction. Experimental results of our example implementation show that this method can reduce hallucination without disrupting other dialogue performance, while keeping adaptive to different generation models. We hope our efforts can support and call for more attention to developing lightweight techniques towards robust and trusty dialogue systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a structural causal model to analyze the causes of hallucination in knowledge-grounded dialogue generation (KGD) systems.
- The authors identify key factors that contribute to hallucination and suggest ways to mitigate it.
- The findings have implications for improving the reliability and trustworthiness of dialogue systems that leverage external knowledge.
Plain English Explanation
Hallucination is a major challenge in dialogue systems that try to incorporate external knowledge. These systems can sometimes generate responses that seem plausible but are actually factually incorrect or made up. The authors of this paper wanted to better understand the root causes of this problem.
They developed a <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-hallucination-regard-to-known">structural causal model</a> to map out the different factors that can lead to hallucination in knowledge-grounded dialogue generation (KGD) systems. This allowed them to see how various elements, like the quality of the knowledge source, the dialogue context, and the model architecture, interact and contribute to hallucination.
By analyzing this causal model, the researchers were able to identify specific ways to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/knowhalu-hallucination-detection-via-multi-form-knowledge">mitigate hallucination</a>. For example, they found that using more diverse knowledge sources, improving the fit between the dialogue context and the knowledge, and making changes to the model architecture could all help reduce the amount of hallucinated information in the system's outputs.
Overall, this work provides valuable insights into the underlying causes of a critical problem in dialogue AI. The findings can inform the development of more reliable and trustworthy conversational agents that can draw upon external knowledge without generating false or misleading information.
Technical Explanation
The paper frames the problem of knowledge-grounded dialogue generation (KGD) as a causal inference task. The authors propose a structural causal model (SCM) to capture the key factors that contribute to hallucination in these systems.
The SCM consists of several variables, including the quality and coverage of the knowledge source, the relevance of the knowledge to the dialogue context, the model's ability to select and integrate relevant knowledge, and the final dialogue output. The model shows how these elements are causally linked and how they can lead to hallucinated responses.
Through analysis of the SCM, the researchers identified several interventions that can help mitigate hallucination. These include:
- <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/hallucination-diversity-aware-active-learning-text-summarization">Using more diverse knowledge sources</a> to improve coverage and reduce biases
- Improving the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dont-believe-everything-you-read-enhancing-summarization">fit between the dialogue context and the knowledge</a> being used
- Enhancing the model's ability to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/hallucination-benchmark-medical-visual-question-answering">select and integrate relevant knowledge</a> into the response
The paper also discusses the limitations of the SCM approach and suggests areas for future research, such as incorporating more complex causal relationships and exploring the role of training data quality and model architecture.
Critical Analysis
The structural causal model proposed in this paper provides a valuable framework for understanding the causes of hallucination in KGD systems. By mapping out the key factors and their interactions, the authors have shed light on an important challenge facing the development of reliable dialogue agents.
One potential limitation of the SCM is that it may oversimplify the complex relationships involved in the KGD task. The authors acknowledge that there could be additional causal paths and feedback loops that are not captured in their current model. Incorporating more nuanced causal structures could lead to a richer understanding of the hallucination problem.
Additionally, while the identified interventions seem promising, their effectiveness will likely depend on the specific KGD system and use case. Further research is needed to evaluate how well these strategies work in practice and whether there are any unintended consequences or tradeoffs to consider.
It would also be interesting to see the authors <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-hallucination-regard-to-known">extend their analysis to other types of language models</a> beyond just KGD, as hallucination is a broader challenge in AI systems that leverage external knowledge.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by providing a systematic framework for analyzing the causes of hallucination. The insights and proposed mitigation strategies can inform the development of more trustworthy and reliable dialogue systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a structural causal model for understanding the factors that contribute to hallucination in knowledge-grounded dialogue generation (KGD) systems. By mapping out the causal relationships between key variables, the authors were able to identify several interventions that can help mitigate this critical problem.
The findings have significant implications for the development of more reliable and trustworthy conversational AI agents. By addressing the root causes of hallucination, as identified in this research, designers of dialogue systems can work towards creating agents that can effectively leverage external knowledge without generating false or misleading information.
The structural causal modeling approach demonstrated in this paper also serves as a valuable methodological contribution, providing a framework for systematically analyzing the complex interactions that underlie challenges in AI systems. As the field continues to grapple with issues like hallucination, this type of causal analysis can lead to important insights and guide the development of more robust and responsible AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud
Fanqi Wan, Xinting Huang, Leyang Cui, Xiaojun Quan, Wei Bi, Shuming Shi
0
0
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various tasks following human alignment, they may still generate responses that sound plausible but contradict factual knowledge, a phenomenon known as emph{hallucination}. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. Specifically, we propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge to evaluate the knowledge boundaries of foundation LLMs. To address knowledge inconsistencies in the alignment data, KCA implements several specific strategies to deal with these data instances. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales. This confirms the effectiveness of mitigating hallucinations by reducing knowledge inconsistency. Our code, model weights, and data are openly accessible at url{https://github.com/fanqiwan/KCA}.
4/17/2024
🛸
Sequence-Level Certainty Reduces Hallucination In Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation
Yixin Wan, Fanyou Wu, Weijie Xu, Srinivasan H. Sengamedu
0
0
In this work, we propose sequence-level certainty as a common theme over hallucination in Knowledge Grounded Dialogue Generation (KGDG). We explore the correlation between the level of hallucination in model responses and two types of sequence-level certainty: probabilistic certainty and semantic certainty. Empirical results reveal that higher levels of both types of certainty in model responses are correlated with lower levels of hallucination. We further propose Certainty-based Response Ranking (CRR), a decoding-time hallucination mitigation method that samples several response candidates, ranks them based on sequence-level certainty, and outputs the response with the highest certainty level. Aligning with our definitions of sequence-level certainty, we design 2 types of CRR approaches: Probabilistic CRR (P-CRR) and Semantic CRR (S-CRR). P-CRR ranks individually sampled model responses using the arithmetic mean log-probability of the entire sequence. S-CRR approaches certainty estimation from meaning-space, and ranks model response candidates based on their semantic certainty level as measured by an entailment-based Agreement Score (AS). Through extensive experiments across 3 KGDG datasets, 3 decoding methods, and 4 KGDG models, we validate the effectiveness of CRR for reducing hallucination in KGDG task.
4/16/2024
Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Model Non-Factual Hallucinations
Lei Yu, Meng Cao, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, Yue Dong
0
0
State-of-the-art language models (LMs) sometimes generate non-factual hallucinations that misalign with world knowledge. To explore the mechanistic causes of these hallucinations, we create diagnostic datasets with subject-relation queries and adapt interpretability methods to trace hallucinations through internal model representations. We discover two general and distinct mechanistic causes of hallucinations shared across LMs (Llama-2, Pythia, GPT-J): 1) knowledge enrichment hallucinations: insufficient subject attribute knowledge in lower layer MLPs, and 2) answer extraction hallucinations: failure to select the correct object attribute in upper layer attention heads. We also found these two internal mechanistic causes of hallucinations are reflected in external manifestations. Based on insights from our mechanistic analysis, we propose a novel hallucination mitigation method through targeted restoration of the LM's internal fact recall pipeline, demonstrating superior performance compared to baselines.
6/19/2024
💬
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Self-Refinement-Enhanced Knowledge Retrieval
Mengjia Niu, Hao Li, Jie Shi, Hamed Haddadi, Fan Mo
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains, although their susceptibility to hallucination poses significant challenges for their deployment in critical areas such as healthcare. To address this issue, retrieving relevant facts from knowledge graphs (KGs) is considered a promising method. Existing KG-augmented approaches tend to be resource-intensive, requiring multiple rounds of retrieval and verification for each factoid, which impedes their application in real-world scenarios. In this study, we propose Self-Refinement-Enhanced Knowledge Graph Retrieval (Re-KGR) to augment the factuality of LLMs' responses with less retrieval efforts in the medical field. Our approach leverages the attribution of next-token predictive probability distributions across different tokens, and various model layers to primarily identify tokens with a high potential for hallucination, reducing verification rounds by refining knowledge triples associated with these tokens. Moreover, we rectify inaccurate content using retrieved knowledge in the post-processing stage, which improves the truthfulness of generated responses. Experimental results on a medical dataset demonstrate that our approach can enhance the factual capability of LLMs across various foundational models as evidenced by the highest scores on truthfulness.
5/13/2024