Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud
2401.10768
0
1
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various tasks following human alignment, they may still generate responses that sound plausible but contradict factual knowledge, a phenomenon known as emph{hallucination}. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. Specifically, we propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge to evaluate the knowledge boundaries of foundation LLMs. To address knowledge inconsistencies in the alignment data, KCA implements several specific strategies to deal with these data instances. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales. This confirms the effectiveness of mitigating hallucinations by reducing knowledge inconsistency. Our code, model weights, and data are openly accessible at url{https://github.com/fanqiwan/KCA}.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) by aligning model outputs with factual knowledge.
- Hallucinations refer to the generation of content that is not grounded in real-world facts or knowledge.
- The authors introduce a "Knowledge Consistent Alignment" (KCA) approach to train LLMs to be more consistent with external knowledge sources.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are incredibly powerful at generating human-like text. However, they can sometimes produce information that is completely made up or inconsistent with real-world facts. This is known as "hallucination." Cause-effect look at alleviating hallucination with knowledge, Hallucination detection via multi-form knowledge, and Hallucination in large language models have all explored this issue.
To address this, the authors of this paper propose a new training method called "Knowledge Consistent Alignment" (KCA). The key idea is to align the language model's outputs more closely with factual information from external knowledge sources. This helps ensure the model generates content that is grounded in real-world knowledge, rather than invented information.
The paper describes experimental results showing that LLMs trained with KCA produce significantly fewer hallucinations compared to standard training approaches. This suggests KCA could be an effective way to make large language models more reliable and trustworthy.
Technical Explanation
The authors introduce a "Knowledge Consistent Alignment" (KCA) approach to mitigate hallucinations in large language models. KCA aims to train the model to generate outputs that are more consistent with factual knowledge from external sources.
The KCA training process involves several key steps:
- Gathering a corpus of factual knowledge from sources like Wikipedia and structured databases.
- Encoding this knowledge into a format that can be used to evaluate the model's outputs.
- During training, comparing the model's generated text to the encoded knowledge, and updating the model parameters to minimize inconsistencies.
This knowledge-aligned training helps steer the model towards producing content that is grounded in real-world facts, rather than hallucinated information. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of KCA through experiments on language modeling and question-answering tasks, showing significant reductions in hallucination rates compared to standard training methods.
The paper also discusses potential limitations of KCA, such as challenges in comprehensively covering all factual knowledge, and potential biases in the knowledge sources used. Enhancing summarization by not believing everything and Hallucination-aware active learning for text summarization provide additional context on mitigating hallucinations in language models.
Critical Analysis
The KCA approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards mitigating hallucinations in large language models. By aligning model outputs with factual knowledge, the authors demonstrate significantly reduced hallucination rates compared to standard training.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. One key challenge is the breadth and comprehensiveness of the knowledge sources used. The authors relied on a relatively limited set of structured databases and Wikipedia, which may not capture the full scope of real-world facts and knowledge.
Another potential issue is the possibility of biases or errors in the knowledge sources themselves. If the external knowledge used for training contains inaccuracies or systematic biases, this could inadvertently introduce biases into the language model's outputs.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of KCA on other important language model capabilities, such as natural language understanding, generation, or few-shot learning. Further research is needed to understand how the knowledge-aligned training approach affects the model's overall performance and versatility.
Despite these limitations, the KCA method represents an important advancement in the field of reliable and trustworthy large language models. As AI systems become more prevalent in high-stakes applications, mitigating hallucinations and ensuring factual consistency will be crucial. The insights and techniques presented in this paper provide a valuable foundation for future research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a "Knowledge Consistent Alignment" (KCA) approach to mitigate hallucinations in large language models. By aligning model outputs with factual knowledge from external sources, the authors demonstrate significant reductions in the generation of inconsistent or made-up information.
The KCA method represents an important step towards developing more reliable and trustworthy language AI systems. As these models become increasingly influential in areas like healthcare, education, and decision-making, ensuring their outputs are grounded in real-world facts will be critical.
While the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research, the insights and techniques presented here provide a valuable foundation for future work in this emerging field. Continued advancements in mitigating hallucinations will be essential for unlocking the full potential of large language models in a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Self-Refinement-Enhanced Knowledge Retrieval
Mengjia Niu, Hao Li, Jie Shi, Hamed Haddadi, Fan Mo
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains, although their susceptibility to hallucination poses significant challenges for their deployment in critical areas such as healthcare. To address this issue, retrieving relevant facts from knowledge graphs (KGs) is considered a promising method. Existing KG-augmented approaches tend to be resource-intensive, requiring multiple rounds of retrieval and verification for each factoid, which impedes their application in real-world scenarios. In this study, we propose Self-Refinement-Enhanced Knowledge Graph Retrieval (Re-KGR) to augment the factuality of LLMs' responses with less retrieval efforts in the medical field. Our approach leverages the attribution of next-token predictive probability distributions across different tokens, and various model layers to primarily identify tokens with a high potential for hallucination, reducing verification rounds by refining knowledge triples associated with these tokens. Moreover, we rectify inaccurate content using retrieved knowledge in the post-processing stage, which improves the truthfulness of generated responses. Experimental results on a medical dataset demonstrate that our approach can enhance the factual capability of LLMs across various foundational models as evidenced by the highest scores on truthfulness.
5/13/2024
⚙️
Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluation
Xiaoying Zhang, Baolin Peng, Ye Tian, Jingyan Zhou, Lifeng Jin, Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi, Helen Meng
0
0
Despite showing increasingly human-like abilities, large language models (LLMs) often struggle with factual inaccuracies, i.e. hallucinations, even when they hold relevant knowledge. To address these hallucinations, current approaches typically necessitate high-quality human factuality annotations. In this work, we explore Self-Alignment for Factuality, where we leverage the self-evaluation capability of an LLM to provide training signals that steer the model towards factuality. Specifically, we incorporate Self-Eval, a self-evaluation component, to prompt an LLM to validate the factuality of its own generated responses solely based on its internal knowledge. Additionally, we design Self-Knowledge Tuning (SK-Tuning) to augment the LLM's self-evaluation ability by improving the model's confidence estimation and calibration. We then utilize these self-annotated responses to fine-tune the model via Direct Preference Optimization algorithm. We show that the proposed self-alignment approach substantially enhances factual accuracy over Llama family models across three key knowledge-intensive tasks on TruthfulQA and BioGEN.
6/12/2024
A Cause-Effect Look at Alleviating Hallucination of Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation
Jifan Yu, Xiaohan Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Zijun Yao, Jing Zhang, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
0
0
Empowered by the large-scale pretrained language models, existing dialogue systems have demonstrated impressive performance conducting fluent and natural-sounding conversations. However, they are still plagued by the hallucination problem, causing unpredictable factual errors in the generated responses. Recently, knowledge-grounded dialogue generation models, that intentionally invoke external knowledge resources to more informative responses, are also proven to be effective in reducing hallucination. Following the idea of getting high-quality knowledge, a few efforts have achieved pretty good performance on this issue. As some inevitable knowledge noises may also lead to hallucinations, it is emergent to investigate the reason and future directions for building noise-tolerant methods in KGD tasks. In this paper, we analyze the causal story behind this problem with counterfactual reasoning methods. Based on the causal effect analysis, we propose a possible solution for alleviating the hallucination in KGD by exploiting the dialogue-knowledge interaction. Experimental results of our example implementation show that this method can reduce hallucination without disrupting other dialogue performance, while keeping adaptive to different generation models. We hope our efforts can support and call for more attention to developing lightweight techniques towards robust and trusty dialogue systems.
4/5/2024
KnowHalu: Hallucination Detection via Multi-Form Knowledge Based Factual Checking
Jiawei Zhang, Chejian Xu, Yu Gai, Freddy Lecue, Dawn Song, Bo Li
0
0
This paper introduces KnowHalu, a novel approach for detecting hallucinations in text generated by large language models (LLMs), utilizing step-wise reasoning, multi-formulation query, multi-form knowledge for factual checking, and fusion-based detection mechanism. As LLMs are increasingly applied across various domains, ensuring that their outputs are not hallucinated is critical. Recognizing the limitations of existing approaches that either rely on the self-consistency check of LLMs or perform post-hoc fact-checking without considering the complexity of queries or the form of knowledge, KnowHalu proposes a two-phase process for hallucination detection. In the first phase, it identifies non-fabrication hallucinations--responses that, while factually correct, are irrelevant or non-specific to the query. The second phase, multi-form based factual checking, contains five key steps: reasoning and query decomposition, knowledge retrieval, knowledge optimization, judgment generation, and judgment aggregation. Our extensive evaluations demonstrate that KnowHalu significantly outperforms SOTA baselines in detecting hallucinations across diverse tasks, e.g., improving by 15.65% in QA tasks and 5.50% in summarization tasks, highlighting its effectiveness and versatility in detecting hallucinations in LLM-generated content.
4/5/2024