Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Training
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates techniques to make machine learning models more robust against data poisoning attacks, where an adversary manipulates the training data to cause the model to perform poorly on certain inputs.
- The proposed approach, called Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning (CRDP), aims to certify that a model's performance will not degrade beyond a specified level, even in the presence of data poisoning.
- CRDP can be applied to models trained using gradient-based optimization methods, which are commonly used in deep learning.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a type of security threat called data poisoning, where an attacker deliberately corrupts the training data for a machine learning model. This can cause the model to perform poorly on certain inputs, even if it works well on the clean, uncorrupted data.
The researchers developed a technique called Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning (CRDP) that can help protect models against this type of attack. CRDP works by analyzing the model's training process and placing a guarantee on its performance, even if a portion of the training data has been tampered with by an adversary.
This is important because many widely used machine learning models, especially in deep learning, are trained using gradient-based optimization methods. CRDP can be applied to these types of models to give them a proven level of robustness against data poisoning attacks.
By providing this certified robustness, CRDP can help ensure that machine learning systems remain reliable and secure, even in the face of malicious attempts to compromise their training data.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind CRDP is to analyze the sensitivity of the model's training process to perturbations in the input data. By bounding this sensitivity, the researchers can provide a guarantee on the model's performance, even if a portion of the training data has been poisoned.
Specifically, CRDP computes a certified radius, which represents the maximum amount of data poisoning that can be tolerated without degrading the model's performance beyond a specified level. This certified radius is derived by analyzing the gradients computed during the model's training.
The researchers show that for models trained using gradient-based optimization, the certified radius can be computed efficiently, allowing CRDP to be applied to a wide range of deep learning architectures.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of CRDP, the paper includes experiments on several benchmark datasets and model architectures, including image classification and natural language processing tasks. The results show that CRDP can provide strong data poisoning robustness without significantly impacting the model's clean-data performance.
Critical Analysis
One limitation of the CRDP approach is that it assumes the attacker has a bounded ability to poison the training data, and the certified radius may not hold if the attacker can corrupt a larger portion of the data.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between the level of certified robustness and the model's clean-data performance. It's possible that achieving higher levels of certified robustness could come at the cost of reduced accuracy on uncontaminated data.
Further research could investigate ways to optimize this trade-off, as well as exploring the application of CRDP to a wider range of machine learning tasks and deployment scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper introduces Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning (CRDP), a novel technique for protecting machine learning models against data poisoning attacks. By analyzing the sensitivity of the training process, CRDP can provide a proven guarantee on the model's performance, even in the presence of maliciously corrupted training data.
The ability to certify robustness to data poisoning is an important step towards building more secure and reliable machine learning systems. CRDP's applicability to gradient-based optimization methods, which are widely used in deep learning, makes it a valuable tool for enhancing the robustness of a broad range of machine learning models and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Training
Philip Sosnin, Mark N. Muller, Maximilian Baader, Calvin Tsay, Matthew Wicker
Modern machine learning pipelines leverage large amounts of public data, making it infeasible to guarantee data quality and leaving models open to poisoning and backdoor attacks. However, provably bounding model behavior under such attacks remains an open problem. In this work, we address this challenge and develop the first framework providing provable guarantees on the behavior of models trained with potentially manipulated data. In particular, our framework certifies robustness against untargeted and targeted poisoning as well as backdoor attacks for both input and label manipulations. Our method leverages convex relaxations to over-approximate the set of all possible parameter updates for a given poisoning threat model, allowing us to bound the set of all reachable parameters for any gradient-based learning algorithm. Given this set of parameters, we provide bounds on worst-case behavior, including model performance and backdoor success rate. We demonstrate our approach on multiple real-world datasets from applications including energy consumption, medical imaging, and autonomous driving.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Provable Robustness of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks
Lukas Gosch, Mahalakshmi Sabanayagam, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar, Stephan Gunnemann
Generalization of machine learning models can be severely compromised by data poisoning, where adversarial changes are applied to the training data, as well as backdoor attacks that additionally manipulate the test data. These vulnerabilities have led to interest in certifying (i.e., proving) that such changes up to a certain magnitude do not affect test predictions. We, for the first time, certify Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) against poisoning and backdoor attacks targeting the node features of a given graph. Our certificates are white-box and based upon $(i)$ the neural tangent kernel, which characterizes the training dynamics of sufficiently wide networks; and $(ii)$ a novel reformulation of the bilevel optimization problem describing poisoning as a mixed-integer linear program. Consequently, we leverage our framework to provide fundamental insights into the role of graph structure and its connectivity on the worst-case robustness behavior of convolution-based and PageRank-based GNNs. We note that our framework is more general and constitutes the first approach to derive white-box poisoning certificates for NNs, which can be of independent interest beyond graph-related tasks.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation in cybersecurity environments
Giorgio Severi, Simona Boboila, John Holodnak, Kendra Kratkiewicz, Rauf Izmailov, Alina Oprea
The training phase of machine learning models is a delicate step, especially in cybersecurity contexts. Recent research has surfaced a series of insidious training-time attacks that inject backdoors in models designed for security classification tasks without altering the training labels. With this work, we propose new techniques that leverage insights in cybersecurity threat models to effectively mitigate these clean-label poisoning attacks, while preserving the model utility. By performing density-based clustering on a carefully chosen feature subspace, and progressively isolating the suspicious clusters through a novel iterative scoring procedure, our defensive mechanism can mitigate the attacks without requiring many of the common assumptions in the existing backdoor defense literature. To show the generality of our proposed mitigation, we evaluate it on two clean-label model-agnostic attacks on two different classic cybersecurity data modalities: network flows classification and malware classification, using gradient boosting and neural network models.
Read more7/12/2024
0
PureGen: Universal Data Purification for Train-Time Poison Defense via Generative Model Dynamics
Sunay Bhat, Jeffrey Jiang, Omead Pooladzandi, Alexander Branch, Gregory Pottie
Train-time data poisoning attacks threaten machine learning models by introducing adversarial examples during training, leading to misclassification. Current defense methods often reduce generalization performance, are attack-specific, and impose significant training overhead. To address this, we introduce a set of universal data purification methods using a stochastic transform, $Psi(x)$, realized via iterative Langevin dynamics of Energy-Based Models (EBMs), Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs), or both. These approaches purify poisoned data with minimal impact on classifier generalization. Our specially trained EBMs and DDPMs provide state-of-the-art defense against various attacks (including Narcissus, Bullseye Polytope, Gradient Matching) on CIFAR-10, Tiny-ImageNet, and CINIC-10, without needing attack or classifier-specific information. We discuss performance trade-offs and show that our methods remain highly effective even with poisoned or distributionally shifted generative model training data.
Read more6/4/2024