Model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation in cybersecurity environments
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a model-agnostic approach to mitigating clean-label backdoor attacks in cybersecurity environments.
- Clean-label backdoor attacks are a type of security vulnerability where an attacker can manipulate a machine learning model to behave maliciously, even when the training data appears normal.
- The proposed method aims to detect and remove these backdoors without requiring access to the model's internal architecture or the original training data.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new technique for protecting machine learning models from a type of security threat called a "clean-label backdoor attack." In this attack, an adversary can secretly manipulate a model to behave maliciously, even when the training data looks normal on the surface.
The key innovation is that this new defense method can work without needing to know the internal structure of the model or have access to the original training data. Instead, it uses a "model-agnostic" approach, meaning it can be applied to a wide variety of machine learning models.
The basic idea is to look for signs that a model has been tampered with, and then apply a cleaning process to remove the backdoor. This helps ensure the model behaves as intended, even in the face of these sneaky attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation" approach that can detect and remove backdoors from machine learning models without requiring access to the model's internal architecture or the original training data.
The method works by first identifying potential backdoors through an influence-based analysis. This examines how small changes to the input data affect the model's predictions, which can reveal the presence of backdoors.
Next, the paper introduces a "clean-label backdoor mitigation" technique that removes the identified backdoors. This involves fine-tuning the model on a small set of "clean-label" data samples - examples that do not contain the backdoor trigger. This helps "unseal" the backdoor and restore the model's intended behavior.
Importantly, the authors show that this mitigation approach is effective across a range of machine learning models, including vision and language models, without needing to know the model's internals. This makes it a flexible and practical defense against these types of security threats.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the challenging problem of clean-label backdoor attacks, which can be difficult to detect and mitigate. The proposed model-agnostic approach is a notable advancement, as it avoids the need for detailed knowledge of the target model's architecture or access to the original training data.
However, the authors acknowledge that their method may not be able to completely eliminate all backdoors, especially in cases where the backdoor trigger is closely aligned with the original task. Additionally, the mitigation process can incur some performance overhead, which may be a concern in time-sensitive applications.
Further research could explore ways to improve the efficiency and robustness of the backdoor detection and removal process, perhaps by incorporating additional contextual information or leveraging recent advances in anomaly detection and adversarial training techniques. Link to related work on partial training isolation and SEEP training dynamics.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel model-agnostic approach for mitigating clean-label backdoor attacks in machine learning systems. By identifying and removing these hidden vulnerabilities without requiring access to the model's internals or original training data, the proposed method offers a practical and flexible defense against this type of security threat.
While the technique may not be able to eliminate all backdoors, it represents an important step forward in securing machine learning models, particularly in critical cybersecurity applications. Further research to enhance the efficiency and robustness of this approach could yield even more robust defenses against these insidious attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation in cybersecurity environments
Giorgio Severi, Simona Boboila, John Holodnak, Kendra Kratkiewicz, Rauf Izmailov, Alina Oprea
The training phase of machine learning models is a delicate step, especially in cybersecurity contexts. Recent research has surfaced a series of insidious training-time attacks that inject backdoors in models designed for security classification tasks without altering the training labels. With this work, we propose new techniques that leverage insights in cybersecurity threat models to effectively mitigate these clean-label poisoning attacks, while preserving the model utility. By performing density-based clustering on a carefully chosen feature subspace, and progressively isolating the suspicious clusters through a novel iterative scoring procedure, our defensive mechanism can mitigate the attacks without requiring many of the common assumptions in the existing backdoor defense literature. To show the generality of our proposed mitigation, we evaluate it on two clean-label model-agnostic attacks on two different classic cybersecurity data modalities: network flows classification and malware classification, using gradient boosting and neural network models.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Wicked Oddities: Selectively Poisoning for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks
Quang H. Nguyen, Nguyen Ngoc-Hieu, The-Anh Ta, Thanh Nguyen-Tang, Kok-Seng Wong, Hoang Thanh-Tung, Khoa D. Doan
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, a type of adversarial attack that poisons the training data to manipulate the behavior of models trained on such data. Clean-label attacks are a more stealthy form of backdoor attacks that can perform the attack without changing the labels of poisoned data. Early works on clean-label attacks added triggers to a random subset of the training set, ignoring the fact that samples contribute unequally to the attack's success. This results in high poisoning rates and low attack success rates. To alleviate the problem, several supervised learning-based sample selection strategies have been proposed. However, these methods assume access to the entire labeled training set and require training, which is expensive and may not always be practical. This work studies a new and more practical (but also more challenging) threat model where the attacker only provides data for the target class (e.g., in face recognition systems) and has no knowledge of the victim model or any other classes in the training set. We study different strategies for selectively poisoning a small set of training samples in the target class to boost the attack success rate in this setting. Our threat model poses a serious threat in training machine learning models with third-party datasets, since the attack can be performed effectively with limited information. Experiments on benchmark datasets illustrate the effectiveness of our strategies in improving clean-label backdoor attacks.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Backdoor Defense through Self-Supervised and Generative Learning
Ivan Saboli'c, Ivan Grubiv{s}i'c, Siniv{s}a v{S}egvi'c
Backdoor attacks change a small portion of training data by introducing hand-crafted triggers and rewiring the corresponding labels towards a desired target class. Training on such data injects a backdoor which causes malicious inference in selected test samples. Most defenses mitigate such attacks through various modifications of the discriminative learning procedure. In contrast, this paper explores an approach based on generative modelling of per-class distributions in a self-supervised representation space. Interestingly, these representations get either preserved or heavily disturbed under recent backdoor attacks. In both cases, we find that per-class generative models allow to detect poisoned data and cleanse the dataset. Experiments show that training on cleansed dataset greatly reduces the attack success rate and retains the accuracy on benign inputs.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Mitigating Backdoor Attack by Injecting Proactive Defensive Backdoor
Shaokui Wei, Hongyuan Zha, Baoyuan Wu
Data-poisoning backdoor attacks are serious security threats to machine learning models, where an adversary can manipulate the training dataset to inject backdoors into models. In this paper, we focus on in-training backdoor defense, aiming to train a clean model even when the dataset may be potentially poisoned. Unlike most existing methods that primarily detect and remove/unlearn suspicious samples to mitigate malicious backdoor attacks, we propose a novel defense approach called PDB (Proactive Defensive Backdoor). Specifically, PDB leverages the home field advantage of defenders by proactively injecting a defensive backdoor into the model during training. Taking advantage of controlling the training process, the defensive backdoor is designed to suppress the malicious backdoor effectively while remaining secret to attackers. In addition, we introduce a reversible mapping to determine the defensive target label. During inference, PDB embeds a defensive trigger in the inputs and reverses the model's prediction, suppressing malicious backdoor and ensuring the model's utility on the original task. Experimental results across various datasets and models demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art defense performance against a wide range of backdoor attacks.
Read more5/28/2024