CFT-Forensics: High-Performance Byzantine Accountability for Crash Fault Tolerant Protocols

Overview

• Crash Fault Tolerant (CFT) consensus algorithms are commonly used in trusted settings like enterprise and government infrastructure.
• However, CFT consensus can be broken by a single corrupt node.
• A desirable property is accountability, where corrupt nodes can be identified if they affect consensus safety.
• The best-known protocol for providing accountability to CFT protocols is PeerReview, which records a signed transcript of all messages.
• PeerReview is agnostic to the underlying CFT protocol, resulting in high communication and storage overhead.
• This paper proposes CFT-Forensics, an accountability framework for CFT protocols that is more efficient than PeerReview.

Plain English Explanation

When computer systems need to reach agreement on important decisions, they often use Crash Fault Tolerant (CFT) consensus algorithms. These algorithms work well in settings where the different parts of the system can be trusted, like within a company or government agency.

However, these CFT algorithms have a weakness - they can be broken if even a single part of the system is corrupted or acting maliciously. This is a problem, because it's important to be able to identify which part of the system is responsible if the consensus is disrupted.

The best solution we had until now was a system called PeerReview. PeerReview records a complete log of all the messages sent between the different parts of the system. That way, if something goes wrong, you can go back and see exactly what happened.

But PeerReview has a downside - it adds a lot of extra communication and storage requirements to the system, making it less efficient. This new paper proposes a new system called CFT-Forensics that can provide the same accountability, but with much lower overhead.

The key idea is that CFT-Forensics works with a special class of CFT protocols, like Raft and multi-Paxos. For these protocols, CFT-Forensics can provide strong accountability guarantees, while only adding a fraction of the overhead that PeerReview requires.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces CFT-Forensics, a new accountability framework for CFT consensus protocols. Unlike the previous best solution, PeerReview, CFT-Forensics is specifically designed to work with a special class of CFT protocols called "forensics-compliant" protocols.

This class includes widely-used protocols like Raft and multi-Paxos. For these protocols, CFT-Forensics can provide strong accountability guarantees - meaning corrupt nodes that affect consensus safety can be identified cryptographically.

Crucially, CFT-Forensics achieves this accountability at a much lower cost than PeerReview. Theoretical analysis shows that under realistic deployment settings, CFT-Forensics operates at a fraction of the communication and storage overhead of the PeerReview approach.

The paper then presents a specific instantiation of CFT-Forensics for the Raft protocol, called Raft-Forensics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Raft-Forensics adds low overhead to vanilla Raft. With 256 byte messages, Raft-Forensics achieves 87.8% of vanilla Raft's peak throughput, at 46% higher latency.

Finally, the paper integrates Raft-Forensics into the OpenCBDC central bank digital currency system. In wide-area network experiments, Raft-Forensics achieves 97.8% of Raft's throughput, with 14.5% higher latency.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the CFT-Forensics accountability framework, demonstrating significant efficiency gains over the existing PeerReview approach. However, a few caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:

1. The paper focuses on a specific class of "forensics-compliant" CFT protocols. While this includes widely-used protocols like Raft and multi-Paxos, it's unclear how easily CFT-Forensics could be extended to other CFT protocols.

2. The paper's theoretical analysis and experimental results are promising, but real-world deployment may surface additional challenges or performance considerations not captured in the study.

3. The integration with OpenCBDC is a helpful proof-of-concept, but more diverse use cases would better demonstrate the generalizability of CFT-Forensics.

4. The paper does not address the potential for adversarial attacks aimed at undermining the accountability mechanisms themselves. Further research on the security properties of CFT-Forensics would be valuable.

Overall, the CFT-Forensics framework represents an important advancement in providing accountability for CFT consensus algorithms. However, as with any new system, continued scrutiny and real-world validation will be crucial to ensuring its robustness and widespread adoption.

Conclusion

This paper introduces CFT-Forensics, a new accountability framework for Crash Fault Tolerant (CFT) consensus protocols. CFT-Forensics addresses a key limitation of existing solutions like PeerReview, which incur high overhead due to their agnosticism to the underlying CFT protocol.

By focusing on a class of "forensics-compliant" CFT protocols, including popular algorithms like Raft and multi-Paxos, CFT-Forensics can provide strong accountability guarantees at a fraction of the cost. Theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate the efficiency gains, with the Raft-Forensics instantiation achieving 87.8% of vanilla Raft's peak throughput.

The integration of Raft-Forensics into the OpenCBDC central bank digital currency system further validates the practical applicability of the approach. As computer systems increasingly rely on consensus algorithms to make critical decisions, accountability mechanisms like CFT-Forensics will play a vital role in ensuring the integrity and trustworthiness of these systems.