Towards Rational Consensus in Honest Majority

Overview

• Distributed consensus protocols allow a group of players to reach agreement, even in the presence of adversaries.
• There are three main threat models: Crash Fault Tolerance (CFT), Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT), and Rational Fault Tolerance (RFT), with RFT being the most general.
• Atomic Broadcast (ABC) is a more generalized form of consensus that ensures agreement on both the proposed values and their ordering across multiple rounds, and is used in blockchains.
• This work studies ABC under the RFT threat model, considering Byzantine and rational adversaries with different motivations.

Plain English Explanation

Distributed consensus protocols are algorithms that allow a group of computers or "players" to reach an agreement, even if some of the players are trying to disrupt the process. The three main types of threat models are:

1. Crash Fault Tolerance (CFT): Players may suddenly stop participating, but they won't try to actively sabotage the process.
2. Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT): Players may behave in completely unpredictable and malicious ways, trying to undermine the agreement.
3. Rational Fault Tolerance (RFT): Players are "rational," meaning they have specific goals and will try to achieve them, but they won't necessarily be outright malicious.

Atomic Broadcast (ABC) is a more advanced form of consensus that not only agrees on the proposed values in each round, but also ensures that the agreed-upon values are consistently ordered across multiple rounds. This is important for applications like blockchains.

This research paper focuses on studying ABC under the RFT threat model, where some players may be Byzantine and others may be "rational" players with specific goals, like trying to disrupt the process (a "forking attack") or censor certain information.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers a scenario with $n$ players, $t$ of whom are Byzantine adversaries and $k$ are rational adversaries. It investigates different types of rational players based on their goals: (1) liveness attack, (2) censorship, or (3) disagreement (forking attack).

The researchers show that ABC is impossible if $n/3 < (t+k) < n/2$ and rational players prefer liveness or censorship attacks. They also find that the consensus protocol proposed by Ranchal-Pedrosa and Gramoli cannot be generalized to solve ABC due to an insecure Nash equilibrium that leads to disagreement.

To address this, the paper proposes a new protocol called pRFT (practical Rational Fault Tolerance) for ABC in partially synchronous network settings. The researchers show that pRFT achieves ABC if (a) rational players prefer only disagreement attacks and (b) $t < n/4$ and $(t + k) < n/2$.

In pRFT, the researchers incorporate accountability (identifying deviating players) within the protocol by leveraging honest players. They also show that the message complexity of pRFT is comparable to the best consensus protocols that guarantee accountability, such as the work by Yin et al. and the work by Buchman et al..

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive study of Atomic Broadcast (ABC) under the Rational Fault Tolerance (RFT) threat model, which is an important and generalized setting for distributed consensus protocols. The researchers have carefully considered different types of rational adversaries and their motivations, and have proposed a novel protocol (pRFT) that addresses the identified limitations of existing approaches.

One potential limitation of the research is that the proposed pRFT protocol still has some restrictions on the number of adversaries (e.g., $t < n/4$ and $(t + k) < n/2$) in order to achieve ABC. It would be interesting to see if these bounds can be further relaxed or if the protocol can be adapted to work in a wider range of settings.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the practical implications and real-world applicability of the pRFT protocol. It would be helpful to understand the performance characteristics, implementation challenges, and potential use cases of this protocol in the context of blockchain and other distributed systems.

Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of distributed consensus, and the proposed pRFT protocol could be a valuable tool for building secure and reliable distributed systems in the presence of rational and Byzantine adversaries.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive study of Atomic Broadcast (ABC) under the Rational Fault Tolerance (RFT) threat model, which is a more general and realistic setting than the traditional Crash Fault Tolerance (CFT) and Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) models. The researchers have identified key limitations of existing approaches and proposed a novel protocol called pRFT that can achieve ABC in partially synchronous network settings with rational and Byzantine adversaries.

The pRFT protocol incorporates accountability mechanisms to detect and penalize deviating players, and its message complexity is comparable to the best consensus protocols with accountability guarantees. This work advances the state of the art in distributed consensus and could have significant implications for the design and implementation of secure and reliable distributed systems, particularly in the context of blockchain technologies.