ChaosBench: A Multi-Channel, Physics-Based Benchmark for Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Climate Prediction

Overview

• Accurate prediction of climate beyond the weather timescale is crucial for disaster preparedness and decision-making, but challenging due to complex factors beyond initial conditions.
• Existing benchmarks have limited forecasting ranges and lack physics-based constraints for explainability.
• The paper proposes "ChaosBench", a benchmark to extend the predictability range of data-driven weather emulators to the subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescale.

Plain English Explanation

Predicting the climate beyond the short-term weather forecast is incredibly important for preparing for and responding to natural disasters and making informed decisions in the face of climate change. However, this is a very difficult challenge. Weather and climate are influenced by a complex web of factors, including not just the initial conditions, but also how different parts of the Earth's system like the oceans, ice, and land interact.

Existing benchmarks and evaluations of climate prediction models have typically focused on shorter timescales of up to 15 days. They also haven't included a wide range of different types of forecasting models as baselines, and haven't done a good job of ensuring the models produce physically realistic and explainable results.

To address these limitations, the researchers propose a new benchmark called "ChaosBench". This benchmark includes a much broader range of Earth system data, spanning over 45 years, to allow models to learn how the full climate system behaves. It also includes physics-based metrics, in addition to standard statistical measures, to ensure the models are producing physically consistent and explainable predictions, rather than just correlating with past data.

The researchers evaluate several state-of-the-art data-driven weather and climate models on this new benchmark, and find that methods developed for short-term weather forecasting struggle to maintain their performance when extended to the longer subseasonal-to-seasonal timescale. However, the researchers outline some promising strategies, like using ensemble predictions and better controlling error propagation, that could help extend the predictability range of these models.

Technical Explanation

The ChaosBench benchmark proposed in this paper aims to push the boundaries of data-driven weather and climate modeling beyond the typical 15-day forecasting range. It includes a much broader set of Earth system variables, spanning over 45 years, to allow models to learn the complex interactions between the atmosphere, oceans, ice, and land.

Crucially, ChaosBench includes not just deterministic and probabilistic forecast evaluation metrics, but also physics-based metrics. This ensures the models are producing predictions that are physically consistent and explainable, rather than just correlating with past data. The paper evaluates several state-of-the-art data-driven models, including ClimaX, PanguWeather, GraphCast, and FourCastNetV2, against a diverse set of physics-based forecast models from national weather agencies.

The results show that methods developed for short-term weather forecasting struggle to maintain their performance when extended to the longer subseasonal-to-seasonal timescale, often collapsing to an unskilled climatology. However, the researchers outline several promising strategies, such as the use of ensembles and better control of error propagation, that could potentially extend the predictability range of these weather emulators.

Critical Analysis

The ChaosBench benchmark presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of climate and weather forecasting. By including a broader range of Earth system variables and physics-based evaluation metrics, it pushes the limits of what data-driven models can achieve beyond the typical weather forecasting timescale.

That said, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for future work. For example, the benchmark is still limited to reanalysis data, which may not fully capture the complexity of the real-world climate system. Additionally, the physics-based metrics used in the evaluation, while an important step forward, may not be sufficient to fully capture all the relevant physical constraints.

Furthermore, while the researchers outline some promising strategies for improving the performance of data-driven weather emulators on the subseasonal-to-seasonal timescale, more research is needed to fully realize the potential of these approaches. Hybrid models that combine data-driven and physics-based components, as explored in ClimODE, could be a fruitful direction for further investigation.

Overall, the ChaosBench benchmark represents an important step forward in pushing the boundaries of climate and weather forecasting, but there is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and reliable predictions at the subseasonal-to-seasonal timescale.

Conclusion

The paper proposes the ChaosBench benchmark as a way to extend the predictability range of data-driven weather emulators to the subseasonal-to-seasonal timescale. By including a broader range of Earth system variables and physics-based evaluation metrics, ChaosBench aims to push the limits of what these models can achieve.

The results show that existing methods developed for short-term weather forecasting struggle to maintain their performance on the longer-range task, highlighting the need for new approaches. The researchers outline several promising strategies, such as the use of ensembles and better control of error propagation, that could potentially help extend the predictability range of these models.

Overall, the ChaosBench benchmark represents an important step forward in the field of climate and weather forecasting, but more research is needed to fully realize the potential of data-driven approaches for predicting the climate beyond the typical weather timescale.