Calibrating Bayesian UNet++ for Sub-Seasonal Forecasting
2403.16612
0
0
Abstract
Seasonal forecasting is a crucial task when it comes to detecting the extreme heat and colds that occur due to climate change. Confidence in the predictions should be reliable since a small increase in the temperatures in a year has a big impact on the world. Calibration of the neural networks provides a way to ensure our confidence in the predictions. However, calibrating regression models is an under-researched topic, especially in forecasters. We calibrate a UNet++ based architecture, which was shown to outperform physics-based models in temperature anomalies. We show that with a slight trade-off between prediction error and calibration error, it is possible to get more reliable and sharper forecasts. We believe that calibration should be an important part of safety-critical machine learning applications such as weather forecasters.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the use of a Bayesian UNet++ model for sub-seasonal temperature forecasting.
- The model is trained on historical temperature data and evaluated on its ability to make accurate predictions over a 2-4 week time horizon.
- The researchers investigate the impact of different hyperparameter settings and calibration techniques on the model's performance and uncertainty quantification.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper describes a machine learning approach for forecasting temperatures a few weeks in advance. The key idea is to use a type of neural network called a "Bayesian UNet++" which can not only make temperature predictions, but also provide a sense of how certain or uncertain it is about those predictions.
This is important because sub-seasonal weather forecasting (2-4 weeks out) is a challenging problem, and having a way to quantify the model's uncertainty can help users understand how much to trust the forecasts. The researchers experiment with different ways of training and calibrating the Bayesian UNet++ model to improve its performance and reliability.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on using a Bayesian UNet++ architecture for sub-seasonal temperature forecasting. Bayesian neural networks like this one can capture uncertainties in their predictions, which is valuable for weather forecasting where there is inherent unpredictability.
The researchers train the Bayesian UNet++ model on historical temperature data, using techniques like rank calibration to ensure the model's uncertainty estimates are well-calibrated. They evaluate the model's temperature prediction performance and uncertainty quantification on held-out test data over a 2-4 week forecast horizon.
The paper explores the impact of different hyperparameter settings and calibration approaches on the model's generalization and site-specific forecasting capabilities. The goal is to develop a Bayesian UNet++ model that can make accurate and reliable sub-seasonal temperature predictions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the Bayesian UNet++ model for sub-seasonal temperature forecasting. However, the authors acknowledge that the model's performance may be limited by the inherent unpredictability of the weather over longer timescales.
Additionally, the study is focused on a single geographic region, so the model's generalization to other locations or climate regimes is not fully addressed. Further research could explore how well the approach transfers to different contexts or incorporates additional data sources to improve forecast skill.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating the potential of Bayesian neural networks for sub-seasonal weather forecasting and highlighting the importance of calibration for reliable uncertainty quantification in this domain.
Conclusion
This research paper explores the use of a Bayesian UNet++ model for sub-seasonal temperature forecasting, which is a challenging problem in weather prediction. The key findings are that the Bayesian approach can provide valuable insights into the uncertainty of its predictions, and that careful calibration is crucial for ensuring the reliability of these uncertainty estimates.
The results suggest that Bayesian neural networks like the UNet++ have promise for improving sub-seasonal weather forecasts, which could benefit a wide range of stakeholders, from farmers planning their crops to emergency managers preparing for extreme weather events. However, further research is needed to fully understand the model's limitations and how to best deploy it in real-world forecasting scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
6/27/2024
🐍
Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning
Jiayi Huang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone
0
0
Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
4/15/2024
📈
Beyond Ensemble Averages: Leveraging Climate Model Ensembles for Subseasonal Forecasting
Elena Orlova, Haokun Liu, Raphael Rossellini, Benjamin A. Cash, Rebecca Willett
0
0
Producing high-quality forecasts of key climate variables, such as temperature and precipitation, on subseasonal time scales has long been a gap in operational forecasting. This study explores an application of machine learning (ML) models as post-processing tools for subseasonal forecasting. Lagged numerical ensemble forecasts (i.e., an ensemble where the members have different initialization dates) and observational data, including relative humidity, pressure at sea level, and geopotential height, are incorporated into various ML methods to predict monthly average precipitation and two-meter temperature two weeks in advance for the continental United States. For regression, quantile regression, and tercile classification tasks, we consider using linear models, random forests, convolutional neural networks, and stacked models (a multi-model approach based on the prediction of the individual ML models). Unlike previous ML approaches that often use ensemble mean alone, we leverage information embedded in the ensemble forecasts to enhance prediction accuracy. Additionally, we investigate extreme event predictions that are crucial for planning and mitigation efforts. Considering ensemble members as a collection of spatial forecasts, we explore different approaches to using spatial information. Trade-offs between different approaches may be mitigated with model stacking. Our proposed models outperform standard baselines such as climatological forecasts and ensemble means. In addition, we investigate feature importance, trade-offs between using the full ensemble or only the ensemble mean, and different modes of accounting for spatial variability.
6/5/2024
🤿
Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
Cheng Wang
0
0
Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions. Though deep learning models achieve remarkable performance on various benchmarks, the study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored. Ideal deep models should have not only high predictive performance but also be well calibrated. There have been some recent advances in calibrating deep models. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles for performing model calibration. First, we start with the definition of model calibration and explain the root causes of model miscalibration. Then we introduce the key metrics that can measure this aspect. It is followed by a summary of calibration methods that we roughly classify into four categories: post-hoc calibration, regularization methods, uncertainty estimation, and composition methods. We also cover recent advancements in calibrating large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Finally, we discuss some open issues, challenges, and potential directions.
5/13/2024