Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs) against "jailbreak" attacks, which are attempts to bypass the models' intended behaviors.
- The researchers develop a framework to characterize and evaluate the reliability of LLMs, focusing on their ability to withstand jailbreak attacks.
- They conduct experiments to assess the robustness of several popular LLMs and provide insights into their vulnerabilities and potential mitigation strategies.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the issue of "jailbreak" attacks on large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems that can generate human-like text. Jailbreak attacks are attempts to make the LLM behave in ways that it was not intended to, such as producing harmful or unethical content.
The researchers created a framework to study how reliable and trustworthy these LLMs are when faced with jailbreak attacks. They tested several popular LLMs to see how well they could withstand these types of attacks. The goal was to understand the models' vulnerabilities and identify potential ways to make them more secure and reliable.
The key findings from the paper include insights into the weaknesses of current LLMs and strategies that could be used to improve their robustness against jailbreak attacks. This research is important because LLMs are increasingly being used in real-world applications, and it's crucial to ensure their reliability and safety.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of jailbreak attacks on large language models (LLMs), which are attempts to bypass the models' intended behaviors and get them to produce harmful or undesirable outputs. The researchers argue that characterizing and evaluating the reliability of LLMs against such attacks is crucial for ensuring their trustworthiness and safety in real-world applications.
To address this challenge, the authors develop a framework for evaluating LLM reliability that focuses on the models' ability to withstand jailbreak attacks. They conduct a series of experiments to assess the robustness of several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, BERT, and T5, against a range of jailbreak attack strategies.
The experimental design involves generating prompts that aim to trigger undesirable behaviors in the LLMs, such as producing hateful, violent, or sexually explicit content. The researchers then analyze the models' responses to identify vulnerabilities and evaluate their reliability.
The key insights from the study include the observation that current LLMs exhibit varying degrees of vulnerability to jailbreak attacks, with some models being more robust than others. The authors also identify potential mitigation strategies, such as strengthening the training data and fine-tuning the models, that could help improve the reliability of LLMs against such attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to evaluating the reliability of LLMs against jailbreak attacks. The researchers have developed a robust framework and conducted thorough experiments to assess the vulnerabilities of several popular models.
One potential limitation of the study is that the jailbreak attack strategies used may not cover the full spectrum of possible attacks that LLMs could face in real-world scenarios. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that the framework should be continuously updated to keep pace with the evolving landscape of potential threats.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical implications of the jailbreak attacks or the potential for misuse of the research findings. It would be valuable for future work to address these ethical considerations and explore ways to ensure the responsible development and deployment of LLMs.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of LLM reliability and trustworthiness by developing a framework for characterizing and evaluating the models' ability to withstand jailbreak attacks. The findings provide valuable insights into the vulnerabilities of current LLMs and suggest potential strategies for improving their robustness.
As LLMs continue to be deployed in diverse applications, ensuring their reliability and safety is crucial. The insights from this research can help inform the development of more secure and trustworthy AI systems, which is an essential step towards realizing the full potential of these powerful language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Dongxia Wang, Jiaying Chen, Wenhai Wang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly become pivotal in content generation with notable societal impact. These models hold the potential to generate content that could be deemed harmful.Efforts to mitigate this risk include implementing safeguards to ensure LLMs adhere to social ethics.However, despite such measures, the phenomenon of jailbreaking -- where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models -- persists as a significant challenge. Recognizing the continuous threat posed by jailbreaking tactics and their repercussions for the trustworthy use of LLMs, a rigorous assessment of the models' robustness against such attacks is essential. This study introduces an comprehensive evaluation framework and conducts an large-scale empirical experiment to address this need. We concentrate on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. By normalizing and aggregating these metrics, we present a detailed reliability score for different LLMs, coupled with strategic recommendations to reduce their susceptibility to such vulnerabilities. Additionally, we explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate a lack of resilience among all tested LLMs against certain strategies, and highlight the need to concentrate on the reliability facets of LLMs. We believe our study can provide valuable insights into enhancing the security evaluation of LLMs against jailbreak within the domain.
Read more8/20/2024
0
A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
Zihao Xu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Stjepan Picek
Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.
Read more5/20/2024
0
Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024
💬
0
Take a Look at it! Rethinking How to Evaluate Language Model Jailbreak
Hongyu Cai, Arjun Arunasalam, Leo Y. Lin, Antonio Bianchi, Z. Berkay Celik
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly integrated with various applications. To ensure that LLMs do not generate unsafe responses, they are aligned with safeguards that specify what content is restricted. However, such alignment can be bypassed to produce prohibited content using a technique commonly referred to as jailbreak. Different systems have been proposed to perform the jailbreak automatically. These systems rely on evaluation methods to determine whether a jailbreak attempt is successful. However, our analysis reveals that current jailbreak evaluation methods have two limitations. (1) Their objectives lack clarity and do not align with the goal of identifying unsafe responses. (2) They oversimplify the jailbreak result as a binary outcome, successful or not. In this paper, we propose three metrics, safeguard violation, informativeness, and relative truthfulness, to evaluate language model jailbreak. Additionally, we demonstrate how these metrics correlate with the goal of different malicious actors. To compute these metrics, we introduce a multifaceted approach that extends the natural language generation evaluation method after preprocessing the response. We evaluate our metrics on a benchmark dataset produced from three malicious intent datasets and three jailbreak systems. The benchmark dataset is labeled by three annotators. We compare our multifaceted approach with three existing jailbreak evaluation methods. Experiments demonstrate that our multifaceted evaluation outperforms existing methods, with F1 scores improving on average by 17% compared to existing baselines. Our findings motivate the need to move away from the binary view of the jailbreak problem and incorporate a more comprehensive evaluation to ensure the safety of the language model.
Read more5/8/2024