ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialog

Read original: arXiv:2409.06097 - Published 9/17/2024 by Yujian Gan, Changling Li, Jinxia Xie, Luou Wen, Matthew Purver, Massimo Poesio
Total Score

0

ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialog

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces ClarQ-LLM, a new benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on their ability to clarify and request information in task-oriented dialogues.
  • The benchmark consists of a diverse set of dialogue scenarios where users interact with a conversational agent to complete tasks.
  • The goal is to assess how well LLMs can engage in clarification and information-seeking behaviors to resolve ambiguities and fill in missing details.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have created a new test called ClarQ-LLM to evaluate how well [object Object] can communicate with users in a conversational setting. In this test, users interact with a virtual assistant to complete various tasks, and the assistant needs to ask clarifying questions or request more information when something is unclear.

The researchers want to see how capable these AI language models are at engaging in this back-and-forth dialogue, [object Object], and proactively seeking the details they need to help users finish their tasks. This is an important skill for conversational AI agents to have, as users don't always provide complete or perfectly clear information the first time.

Technical Explanation

The [object Object] is designed to assess an LLM's ability to clarify and request information in task-oriented dialogues. It consists of a diverse set of dialogue scenarios covering topics like travel planning, product selection, and troubleshooting.

Each dialogue begins with a user request or task, and the LLM must engage in a back-and-forth exchange to gather the necessary information to complete the task. This requires the model to identify ambiguities or missing details, formulate appropriate clarification questions, and use the responses to progressively improve its understanding.

The benchmark evaluates the LLM's performance along several dimensions, including the relevance and informativeness of its clarification questions, the coherence of the overall dialogue flow, and the final task completion rate. This provides a comprehensive assessment of the model's conversational and task-oriented reasoning capabilities.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that ClarQ-LLM is a relatively narrow benchmark focused on clarification and information-seeking behaviors. While this is an important aspect of task-oriented dialogue, there are many other skills, such as [object Object] and [object Object], that are also crucial for building effective conversational AI agents.

Additionally, the benchmark does not address the challenges of [object Object] or [object Object] dialogue, which are increasingly important in real-world applications.

Further research is needed to expand the scope of the benchmark and explore how different architectural choices and training strategies affect an LLM's performance on these types of conversational tasks.

Conclusion

The ClarQ-LLM benchmark provides a valuable tool for evaluating the conversational and task-oriented reasoning capabilities of large language models. By focusing on clarification and information-seeking behaviors, it highlights an important aspect of building effective [object Object] that can engage in natural and helpful dialogues with users.

The insights gained from this benchmark can inform the development of more advanced AI systems that can better understand and respond to user needs, ultimately improving the user experience and the effectiveness of task-oriented applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialog
Total Score

0

ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialog

Yujian Gan, Changling Li, Jinxia Xie, Luou Wen, Matthew Purver, Massimo Poesio

We introduce ClarQ-LLM, an evaluation framework consisting of bilingual English-Chinese conversation tasks, conversational agents and evaluation metrics, designed to serve as a strong benchmark for assessing agents' ability to ask clarification questions in task-oriented dialogues. The benchmark includes 31 different task types, each with 10 unique dialogue scenarios between information seeker and provider agents. The scenarios require the seeker to ask questions to resolve uncertainty and gather necessary information to complete tasks. Unlike traditional benchmarks that evaluate agents based on fixed dialogue content, ClarQ-LLM includes a provider conversational agent to replicate the original human provider in the benchmark. This allows both current and future seeker agents to test their ability to complete information gathering tasks through dialogue by directly interacting with our provider agent. In tests, LLAMA3.1 405B seeker agent managed a maximum success rate of only 60.05%, showing that ClarQ-LLM presents a strong challenge for future research.

Read more

9/17/2024

ProductAgent: Benchmarking Conversational Product Search Agent with Asking Clarification Questions
Total Score

0

ProductAgent: Benchmarking Conversational Product Search Agent with Asking Clarification Questions

Jingheng Ye, Yong Jiang, Xiaobin Wang, Yinghui Li, Yangning Li, Hai-Tao Zheng, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang

This paper introduces the task of product demand clarification within an e-commercial scenario, where the user commences the conversation with ambiguous queries and the task-oriented agent is designed to achieve more accurate and tailored product searching by asking clarification questions. To address this task, we propose ProductAgent, a conversational information seeking agent equipped with abilities of strategic clarification question generation and dynamic product retrieval. Specifically, we develop the agent with strategies for product feature summarization, query generation, and product retrieval. Furthermore, we propose the benchmark called PROCLARE to evaluate the agent's performance both automatically and qualitatively with the aid of a LLM-driven user simulator. Experiments show that ProductAgent interacts positively with the user and enhances retrieval performance with increasing dialogue turns, where user demands become gradually more explicit and detailed. All the source codes will be released after the review anonymity period.

Read more

7/2/2024

clembench-2024: A Challenging, Dynamic, Complementary, Multilingual Benchmark and Underlying Flexible Framework for LLMs as Multi-Action Agents
Total Score

0

clembench-2024: A Challenging, Dynamic, Complementary, Multilingual Benchmark and Underlying Flexible Framework for LLMs as Multi-Action Agents

Anne Beyer, Kranti Chalamalasetti, Sherzod Hakimov, Brielen Madureira, Philipp Sadler, David Schlangen

It has been established in recent work that Large Language Models (LLMs) can be prompted to self-play conversational games that probe certain capabilities (general instruction following, strategic goal orientation, language understanding abilities), where the resulting interactive game play can be automatically scored. In this paper, we take one of the proposed frameworks for setting up such game-play environments, and further test its usefulness as an evaluation instrument, along a number of dimensions: We show that it can easily keep up with new developments while avoiding data contamination, we show that the tests implemented within it are not yet saturated (human performance is substantially higher than that of even the best models), and we show that it lends itself to investigating additional questions, such as the impact of the prompting language on performance. We believe that the approach forms a good basis for making decisions on model choice for building applied interactive systems, and perhaps ultimately setting up a closed-loop development environment of system and simulated evaluator.

Read more

6/3/2024

CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrieval
Total Score

0

CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrieval

Yizhou Chi, Jessy Lin, Kevin Lin, Dan Klein

Users often make ambiguous requests that require clarification. We study the problem of asking clarification questions in an information retrieval setting, where systems often face ambiguous search queries and it is challenging to turn the uncertainty in the retrieval model into a natural language question. We present CLARINET, a system that asks informative clarification questions by choosing questions whose answers would maximize certainty in the correct candidate. Our approach works by augmenting a large language model (LLM) to condition on a retrieval distribution, finetuning end-to-end to generate the question that would have maximized the rank of the true candidate at each turn. When evaluated on a real-world retrieval dataset of users searching for books, our system outperforms traditional heuristics such as information gain on retrieval success by 17% and vanilla-prompted LLMs by 39% relative.

Read more

5/28/2024