Classification Under Strategic Self-Selection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of classification in strategic environments where individuals can adapt their behavior to influence the outcome of the classifier.
- The authors investigate how strategic self-selection by individuals affects the performance of machine learning classifiers and propose new algorithms to address this challenge.
- The research has important implications for real-world applications like admissions, hiring, and loan decisions, where individuals may try to game the system.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world situations, people can adjust their behavior to try to influence the decisions made about them. For example, when applying to college, students may choose to take certain classes or extracurricular activities to improve their chances of admission. This is known as strategic self-selection.
The authors of this paper looked at how this strategic behavior affects the performance of machine learning classifiers - algorithms used to make decisions about people, like who to admit to a program or who to give a loan to. They found that when people can adapt their behavior to try to influence the classifier's decision, the classifier's accuracy often decreases.
To address this challenge, the researchers propose new classification algorithms that account for strategic self-selection. These algorithms try to learn the true underlying characteristics of individuals, rather than just optimizing for accurate predictions.
The insights from this research are important for real-world applications where people's livelihoods are affected by automated decisions, like college admissions, hiring, and loan applications. By understanding how strategic behavior can undermine the fairness and accuracy of these systems, the researchers hope to develop more robust and ethical decision-making tools.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the problem of strategic classification, where individuals can adapt their behavior to influence the outcome of a classifier. The authors consider a setting where a classifier is used to make decisions about individuals (e.g., college admissions, loan approvals), and individuals can engage in strategic self-selection to improve their chances of a favorable outcome.
The key technical contributions of the paper are:
- Formal model: The authors propose a formal model of strategic classification that captures the interaction between the classifier and the strategic individuals.
- Hardness results: The authors prove that the problem of learning an optimal classifier in this strategic setting is computationally hard in general.
- New algorithms: To address the challenge, the authors propose new classification algorithms that are designed to be robust to strategic self-selection. These algorithms aim to learn the true underlying characteristics of individuals rather than just optimizing for accurate predictions.
- Experiments: The authors evaluate their proposed algorithms on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating their effectiveness in dealing with strategic behavior compared to standard classification approaches.
The technical insights from this research have important implications for the development of fair and ethical decision-making systems in high-stakes applications, such as college admissions, hiring, and loan approvals. By understanding how strategic behavior can undermine the performance of standard classifiers, the researchers aim to provide new tools for building more robust and trustworthy decision-making systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the study of machine learning in strategic environments, but it also raises some important caveats and areas for further research:
- Limitations of the formal model: The authors' model makes several simplifying assumptions, such as assuming that individuals have complete information about the classifier and can perfectly optimize their behavior. In real-world settings, these assumptions may not hold, and the strategic behavior may be more complex.
- Evaluation on real-world data: While the authors evaluate their algorithms on synthetic and real-world datasets, the real-world datasets may not fully capture the nuances of strategic behavior. More extensive testing on a wider range of real-world applications would be useful to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
- Potential unintended consequences: The authors acknowledge that their proposed algorithms, while designed to be more robust to strategic behavior, may also have unintended consequences, such as incentivizing individuals to further game the system. Careful consideration of these potential issues is needed when deploying such systems in practice.
- Ethical considerations: The paper touches on the ethical implications of strategic classification, but a deeper exploration of the societal impact and potential for harm would be valuable, especially in high-stakes applications like college admissions and loan approvals.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding and addressing the challenges of strategic classification. However, continued research and careful implementation are necessary to ensure that these systems are deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.
Conclusion
This paper explores the problem of classification in strategic environments, where individuals can adapt their behavior to influence the outcome of the classifier. The authors propose new algorithms that aim to be robust to strategic self-selection, with the goal of developing more fair and trustworthy decision-making systems.
The insights from this research have important implications for a wide range of real-world applications, from college admissions to loan approvals, where automated decisions can have significant impact on people's lives. By understanding the challenges posed by strategic behavior, the researchers hope to pave the way for more ethical and responsible use of machine learning in high-stakes decision-making.
While the paper makes a valuable contribution, it also highlights the need for further research to address the complexities of strategic behavior and the potential unintended consequences of the proposed solutions. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration between machine learning researchers, policymakers, and domain experts will be crucial in ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed in a way that serves the best interests of individuals and society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Classification Under Strategic Self-Selection
Guy Horowitz, Yonatan Sommer, Moran Koren, Nir Rosenfeld
When users stand to gain from certain predictions, they are prone to act strategically to obtain favorable predictive outcomes. Whereas most works on strategic classification consider user actions that manifest as feature modifications, we study a novel setting in which users decide -- in response to the learned classifier -- whether to at all participate (or not). For learning approaches of increasing strategic awareness, we study the effects of self-selection on learning, and the implications of learning on the composition of the self-selected population. We then propose a differentiable framework for learning under self-selective behavior, which can be optimized effectively. We conclude with experiments on real data and simulated behavior that both complement our analysis and demonstrate the utility of our approach.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Content
Sarah H. Cen, Andrew Ilyas, Jennifer Allen, Hannah Li, Aleksander Madry
Most modern recommendation algorithms are data-driven: they generate personalized recommendations by observing users' past behaviors. A common assumption in recommendation is that how a user interacts with a piece of content (e.g., whether they choose to like it) is a reflection of the content, but not of the algorithm that generated it. Although this assumption is convenient, it fails to capture user strategization: that users may attempt to shape their future recommendations by adapting their behavior to the recommendation algorithm. In this work, we test for user strategization by conducting a lab experiment and survey. To capture strategization, we adopt a model in which strategic users select their engagement behavior based not only on the content, but also on how their behavior affects downstream recommendations. Using a custom music player that we built, we study how users respond to different information about their recommendation algorithm as well as to different incentives about how their actions affect downstream outcomes. We find strong evidence of strategization across outcome metrics, including participants' dwell time and use of likes. For example, participants who are told that the algorithm mainly pays attention to likes and dislikes use those functions 1.9x more than participants told that the algorithm mainly pays attention to dwell time. A close analysis of participant behavior (e.g., in response to our incentive conditions) rules out experimenter demand as the main driver of these trends. Further, in our post-experiment survey, nearly half of participants self-report strategizing in the wild, with some stating that they ignore content they actually like to avoid over-recommendation of that content in the future. Together, our findings suggest that user strategization is common and that platforms cannot ignore the effect of their algorithms on user behavior.
Read more5/10/2024
🤔
0
Understanding Model Selection For Learning In Strategic Environments
Tinashe Handina, Eric Mazumdar
The deployment of ever-larger machine learning models reflects a growing consensus that the more expressive the model class one optimizes over$unicode{x2013}$and the more data one has access to$unicode{x2013}$the more one can improve performance. As models get deployed in a variety of real-world scenarios, they inevitably face strategic environments. In this work, we consider the natural question of how the interplay of models and strategic interactions affects the relationship between performance at equilibrium and the expressivity of model classes. We find that strategic interactions can break the conventional view$unicode{x2013}$meaning that performance does not necessarily monotonically improve as model classes get larger or more expressive (even with infinite data). We show the implications of this result in several contexts including strategic regression, strategic classification, and multi-agent reinforcement learning. In particular, we show that each of these settings admits a Braess' paradox-like phenomenon in which optimizing over less expressive model classes allows one to achieve strictly better equilibrium outcomes. Motivated by these examples, we then propose a new paradigm for model selection in games wherein an agent seeks to choose amongst different model classes to use as their action set in a game.
Read more6/4/2024
👀
0
Self-Training: A Survey
Massih-Reza Amini, Vasilii Feofanov, Loic Pauletto, Lies Hadjadj, Emilie Devijver, Yury Maximov
Semi-supervised algorithms aim to learn prediction functions from a small set of labeled observations and a large set of unlabeled observations. Because this framework is relevant in many applications, they have received a lot of interest in both academia and industry. Among the existing techniques, self-training methods have undoubtedly attracted greater attention in recent years. These models are designed to find the decision boundary on low density regions without making additional assumptions about the data distribution, and use the unsigned output score of a learned classifier, or its margin, as an indicator of confidence. The working principle of self-training algorithms is to learn a classifier iteratively by assigning pseudo-labels to the set of unlabeled training samples with a margin greater than a certain threshold. The pseudo-labeled examples are then used to enrich the labeled training data and to train a new classifier in conjunction with the labeled training set. In this paper, we present self-training methods for binary and multi-class classification; as well as their variants and two related approaches, namely consistency-based approaches and transductive learning. We examine the impact of significant self-training features on various methods, using different general and image classification benchmarks, and we discuss our ideas for future research in self-training. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first thorough and complete survey on this subject.
Read more5/28/2024