Closing the Gap in High-Risk Pregnancy Care Using Machine Learning and Human-AI Collaboration

Read original: arXiv:2305.17261 - Published 4/23/2024 by Hussein Mozannar, Yuria Utsumi, Irene Y. Chen, Stephanie S. Gervasi, Michele Ewing, Aaron Smith-McLallen, David Sontag
Total Score

0

🌐

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper describes the implementation of a real-world machine learning (ML) system to help identify pregnant patients at risk of complications.
  • The system uses a novel hybrid-ML classifier to predict pregnancy status and a standard classifier to predict risk of pregnancy complications.
  • The models were developed in collaboration with a care management team and integrated into a user interface with explanations for nurses.
  • The proposed models outperformed commonly used claim codes for identifying pregnant patients and accurately triaged patients by risk of complications.
  • The research was guided by a human-centric design approach, and nurses preferred the proposed models over existing approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Pregnancy can be a complicated process, and some women may face higher risks of health issues for themselves or their babies. Health insurance companies use computer algorithms to try to identify these "high-risk" pregnancies, so they can provide extra support to the expectant mothers.

This research paper describes a new system that uses machine learning to do this job better. The researchers worked with a care management team to develop two models:

  1. One model that can predict whether a patient is pregnant, based on their health insurance claims data. This helps identify the right patients to monitor.
  2. Another model that can predict whether a pregnant patient is at risk of developing complications, again using the claims data. This allows the care team to focus extra attention on the highest-risk patients.

The researchers tested these models and found they were better at identifying pregnant patients and assessing their risk levels, compared to the standard methods insurance companies currently use. Importantly, they also worked closely with the nurses who would be using the system, to make sure it was user-friendly and provided helpful explanations for the recommendations.

Overall, this research demonstrates how machine learning can be used to improve the process of identifying and supporting high-risk pregnancies, with the goal of helping both mothers and babies stay healthy.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the implementation of a real-world machine learning (ML)-based system to assist care managers in identifying pregnant patients at risk of complications. The researchers developed a novel hybrid-ML classifier to predict whether patients are pregnant, and a standard classifier to predict whether a patient will develop pregnancy complications.

The models were trained using claims data from a US health insurance company. The hybrid pregnancy classifier combined multiple ML techniques, including decision trees and logistic regression, to outperform commonly used claim codes for identifying pregnant patients, while maintaining a manageable false positive rate.

The risk complication classifier used a standard machine learning approach to accurately triage patients by their risk of developing complications during pregnancy. Both models were developed in collaboration with the care management team and integrated into a user interface that provided explanations for the nurses using the system.

The researchers followed a human-centric design approach, conducting user studies with the nurses to understand their preferences. The nurses reported that they preferred the proposed ML-based models over the existing approaches used by the insurance company.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the proposed ML-based system and demonstrates its improved performance over standard claim-based methods for identifying high-risk pregnancies. The human-centric design approach, which involved close collaboration with the care management team, is a particular strength of the research.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats in detail. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the models might perform on a more diverse patient population, or how they handle edge cases and rare conditions. Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases in the training data or the implications for equity and fairness in the delivery of care.

While the research on using machine learning for predicting postoperative complications is promising, there are still open questions around the interpretability and trustworthiness of such systems. The paper touches on this aspect by integrating explanations into the user interface, but more discussion of the challenges and trade-offs involved would be helpful.

Overall, the research represents an important step forward in using machine learning to enhance clinical decision-making and support for high-risk pregnancies. However, continued critical evaluation and a focus on responsible AI design will be essential as these systems are deployed in real-world healthcare settings.

Conclusion

This paper describes the implementation of a machine learning-based system to assist care managers in identifying pregnant patients at risk of complications. The researchers developed novel hybrid and standard classifiers to predict pregnancy status and risk of complications, respectively, using health insurance claims data.

The proposed models outperformed standard claim-based approaches and were integrated into a user-friendly interface with explanations for the nurses using the system. The human-centric design approach, which involved close collaboration with the care management team, was a key strength of the research.

While the results are promising, the paper does not fully address potential limitations, biases, and challenges around the interpretability and trustworthiness of such machine learning systems in healthcare. Continued critical evaluation and responsible AI design will be crucial as these technologies are deployed to support high-risk pregnancies and other clinical decision-making tasks.

Overall, this research demonstrates the potential for machine learning to enhance clinical care and improve outcomes for both mothers and babies, though further work is needed to ensure these systems are reliable, transparent, and equitable.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌐

Total Score

0

Closing the Gap in High-Risk Pregnancy Care Using Machine Learning and Human-AI Collaboration

Hussein Mozannar, Yuria Utsumi, Irene Y. Chen, Stephanie S. Gervasi, Michele Ewing, Aaron Smith-McLallen, David Sontag

A high-risk pregnancy is a pregnancy complicated by factors that can adversely affect the outcomes of the mother or the infant. Health insurers use algorithms to identify members who would benefit from additional clinical support. This work presents the implementation of a real-world ML-based system to assist care managers in identifying pregnant patients at risk of complications. In this retrospective evaluation study, we developed a novel hybrid-ML classifier to predict whether patients are pregnant and trained a standard classifier using claims data from a health insurance company in the US to predict whether a patient will develop pregnancy complications. These models were developed in cooperation with the care management team and integrated into a user interface with explanations for the nurses. The proposed models outperformed commonly used claim codes for the identification of pregnant patients at the expense of a manageable false positive rate. Our risk complication classifier shows that we can accurately triage patients by risk of complication. Our approach and evaluation are guided by human-centric design. In user studies with the nurses, they preferred the proposed models over existing approaches.

Read more

4/23/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Unveiling the Unborn: Advancing Fetal Health Classification through Machine Learning

Sujith K Mandala

Fetal health classification is a critical task in obstetrics, enabling early identification and management of potential health problems. However, it remains challenging due to data complexity and limited labeled samples. This research paper presents a novel machine-learning approach for fetal health classification, leveraging a LightGBM classifier trained on a comprehensive dataset. The proposed model achieves an impressive accuracy of 98.31% on a test set. Our findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning in enhancing fetal health classification, offering a more objective and accurate assessment. Notably, our approach combines various features, such as fetal heart rate, uterine contractions, and maternal blood pressure, to provide a comprehensive evaluation. This methodology holds promise for improving early detection and treatment of fetal health issues, ensuring better outcomes for both mothers and babies. Beyond the high accuracy achieved, the novelty of our approach lies in its comprehensive feature selection and assessment methodology. By incorporating multiple data points, our model offers a more holistic and reliable evaluation compared to traditional methods. This research has significant implications in the field of obstetrics, paving the way for advancements in early detection and intervention of fetal health concerns. Future work involves validating the model on a larger dataset and developing a clinical application. Ultimately, we anticipate that our research will revolutionize the assessment and management of fetal health, contributing to improved healthcare outcomes for expectant mothers and their babies.

Read more

9/9/2024

Explainable Machine Learning for ICU Readmission Prediction
Total Score

0

Explainable Machine Learning for ICU Readmission Prediction

Alex G. C. de S'a, Daniel Gould, Anna Fedyukova, Mitchell Nicholas, Lucy Dockrell, Calvin Fletcher, David Pilcher, Daniel Capurro, David B. Ascher, Khaled El-Khawas, Douglas E. V. Pires

The intensive care unit (ICU) comprises a complex hospital environment, where decisions made by clinicians have a high level of risk for the patients' lives. A comprehensive care pathway must then be followed to reduce p complications. Uncertain, competing and unplanned aspects within this environment increase the difficulty in uniformly implementing the care pathway. Readmission contributes to this pathway's difficulty, occurring when patients are admitted again to the ICU in a short timeframe, resulting in high mortality rates and high resource utilisation. Several works have tried to predict readmission through patients' medical information. Although they have some level of success while predicting readmission, those works do not properly assess, characterise and understand readmission prediction. This work proposes a standardised and explainable machine learning pipeline to model patient readmission on a multicentric database (i.e., the eICU cohort with 166,355 patients, 200,859 admissions and 6,021 readmissions) while validating it on monocentric (i.e., the MIMIC IV cohort with 382,278 patients, 523,740 admissions and 5,984 readmissions) and multicentric settings. Our machine learning pipeline achieved predictive performance in terms of the area of the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) up to 0.7 with a Random Forest classification model, yielding an overall good calibration and consistency on validation sets. From explanations provided by the constructed models, we could also derive a set of insightful conclusions, primarily on variables related to vital signs and blood tests (e.g., albumin, blood urea nitrogen and hemoglobin levels), demographics (e.g., age, and admission height and weight), and ICU-associated variables (e.g., unit type). These insights provide an invaluable source of information during clinicians' decision-making while discharging ICU patients.

Read more

9/16/2024

HuLP: Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis
Total Score

0

HuLP: Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis

Muhammad Ridzuan, Mai Kassem, Numan Saeed, Ikboljon Sobirov, Mohammad Yaqub

This paper introduces HuLP, a Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis model designed to enhance the reliability and interpretability of prognostic models in clinical contexts, especially when faced with the complexities of missing covariates and outcomes. HuLP offers an innovative approach that enables human expert intervention, empowering clinicians to interact with and correct models' predictions, thus fostering collaboration between humans and AI models to produce more accurate prognosis. Additionally, HuLP addresses the challenges of missing data by utilizing neural networks and providing a tailored methodology that effectively handles missing data. Traditional methods often struggle to capture the nuanced variations within patient populations, leading to compromised prognostic predictions. HuLP imputes missing covariates based on imaging features, aligning more closely with clinician workflows and enhancing reliability. We conduct our experiments on two real-world, publicly available medical datasets to demonstrate the superiority and competitiveness of HuLP.

Read more

7/10/2024