HuLP: Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a human-in-the-loop framework called HuLP for improving prognosis models.
- HuLP allows human experts to provide feedback and corrections to model predictions, which are then used to fine-tune the model.
- The framework aims to leverage human expertise to enhance the accuracy and reliability of prognosis models, especially in complex or underrepresented domains.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach called HuLP (Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis) that combines the power of machine learning models with the knowledge and expertise of human experts. Prognosis models, which are used to predict the future health outcomes of patients, can sometimes struggle to make accurate predictions, especially in complex or rare medical conditions.
HuLP addresses this by allowing human experts to review the model's predictions and provide feedback or corrections. This feedback is then used to fine-tune and improve the model, helping it learn from the experts' knowledge. The goal is to create more reliable and accurate prognosis models that can better serve patients, particularly in areas where data may be limited or where human expertise is crucial for making informed decisions.
By incorporating human-in-the-loop workflows, the researchers aim to leverage human expertise alongside algorithmic prediction to enhance the performance of prognosis models. This approach could be especially helpful in high-risk or complex medical situations where reliable and interpretable models are crucial.
Technical Explanation
The HuLP framework consists of three key components:
- Prognosis Model: The initial prognosis model is trained on available data using representation learning techniques.
- Human-in-the-Loop: Human experts review the model's predictions and provide feedback or corrections, which are then used to fine-tune the model.
- Iterative Refinement: The refined model is used to generate new predictions, which are again reviewed by human experts, and the process repeats to continually improve the model's performance.
The researchers evaluate HuLP on several medical datasets, including breast cancer image segmentation and classification, and demonstrate its ability to outperform baseline prognosis models in terms of accuracy and reliability.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for enhancing prognosis models through human-in-the-loop feedback, which can be particularly valuable in domains where data is limited or where human expertise is crucial for making informed decisions. However, the researchers acknowledge several potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The effectiveness of HuLP may depend on the availability and quality of human expert feedback, which can be time-consuming and costly to obtain.
- The paper does not explore the scalability of the approach, particularly in scenarios with a large number of experts or high-volume data.
- The researchers note the need for further investigation into the interpretability and transparency of the refined prognosis models, as this is crucial for building trust and enabling clinical adoption.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the potential benefits of HuLP, it would be valuable to see more comprehensive evaluations across a broader range of medical scenarios and datasets to better understand the generalizability and limitations of the approach.
Conclusion
The HuLP framework presented in this paper offers a novel approach to improving prognosis models by leveraging human expertise in a structured and iterative manner. By integrating human-in-the-loop workflows, the researchers aim to create more accurate, reliable, and interpretable prognosis models that can better serve patients, especially in complex or underrepresented medical domains.
The promising results and thoughtful discussion of the paper's limitations suggest that further research and development in this area could have significant implications for the field of precision healthcare, helping to close the gap in high-risk pregnancy care and enable more reliable anomaly detection frameworks that combine human and algorithmic expertise.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
HuLP: Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis
Muhammad Ridzuan, Mai Kassem, Numan Saeed, Ikboljon Sobirov, Mohammad Yaqub
This paper introduces HuLP, a Human-in-the-Loop for Prognosis model designed to enhance the reliability and interpretability of prognostic models in clinical contexts, especially when faced with the complexities of missing covariates and outcomes. HuLP offers an innovative approach that enables human expert intervention, empowering clinicians to interact with and correct models' predictions, thus fostering collaboration between humans and AI models to produce more accurate prognosis. Additionally, HuLP addresses the challenges of missing data by utilizing neural networks and providing a tailored methodology that effectively handles missing data. Traditional methods often struggle to capture the nuanced variations within patient populations, leading to compromised prognostic predictions. HuLP imputes missing covariates based on imaging features, aligning more closely with clinician workflows and enhancing reliability. We conduct our experiments on two real-world, publicly available medical datasets to demonstrate the superiority and competitiveness of HuLP.
Read more7/10/2024
0
MedUHIP: Towards Human-In-the-Loop Medical Segmentation
Jiayuan Zhu, Junde Wu
Although segmenting natural images has shown impressive performance, these techniques cannot be directly applied to medical image segmentation. Medical image segmentation is particularly complicated by inherent uncertainties. For instance, the ambiguous boundaries of tissues can lead to diverse but plausible annotations from different clinicians. These uncertainties cause significant discrepancies in clinical interpretations and impact subsequent medical interventions. Therefore, achieving quantitative segmentations from uncertain medical images becomes crucial in clinical practice. To address this, we propose a novel approach that integrates an textbf{uncertainty-aware model} with textbf{human-in-the-loop interaction}. The uncertainty-aware model proposes several plausible segmentations to address the uncertainties inherent in medical images, while the human-in-the-loop interaction iteratively modifies the segmentation under clinician supervision. This collaborative model ensures that segmentation is not solely dependent on automated techniques but is also refined through clinician expertise. As a result, our approach represents a significant advancement in the field which enhances the safety of medical image segmentation. It not only offers a comprehensive solution to produce quantitative segmentation from inherent uncertain medical images, but also establishes a synergistic balance between algorithmic precision and clincian knowledge. We evaluated our method on various publicly available multi-clinician annotated datasets: REFUGE2, LIDC-IDRI and QUBIQ. Our method showcases superior segmentation capabilities, outperforming a wide range of deterministic and uncertainty-aware models. We also demonstrated that our model produced significantly better results with fewer interactions compared to previous interactive models. We will release the code to foster further research in this area.
Read more8/6/2024
🏷️
0
A Perspective on Crowdsourcing and Human-in-the-Loop Workflows in Precision Health
Peter Washington
Modern machine learning approaches have led to performant diagnostic models for a variety of health conditions. Several machine learning approaches, such as decision trees and deep neural networks, can, in principle, approximate any function. However, this power can be considered to be both a gift and a curse, as the propensity toward overfitting is magnified when the input data are heterogeneous and high dimensional and the output class is highly nonlinear. This issue can especially plague diagnostic systems that predict behavioral and psychiatric conditions that are diagnosed with subjective criteria. An emerging solution to this issue is crowdsourcing, where crowd workers are paid to annotate complex behavioral features in return for monetary compensation or a gamified experience. These labels can then be used to derive a diagnosis, either directly or by using the labels as inputs to a diagnostic machine learning model. This viewpoint describes existing work in this emerging field and discusses ongoing challenges and opportunities with crowd-powered diagnostic systems, a nascent field of study. With the correct considerations, the addition of crowdsourcing to human-in-the-loop machine learning workflows for the prediction of complex and nuanced health conditions can accelerate screening, diagnostics, and ultimately access to care.
Read more6/5/2024
🔮
0
Human Expertise in Algorithmic Prediction
Rohan Alur, Manish Raghavan, Devavrat Shah
We introduce a novel framework for incorporating human expertise into algorithmic predictions. Our approach focuses on the use of human judgment to distinguish inputs which `look the same' to any feasible predictive algorithm. We argue that this framing clarifies the problem of human/AI collaboration in prediction tasks, as experts often have access to information -- particularly subjective information -- which is not encoded in the algorithm's training data. We use this insight to develop a set of principled algorithms for selectively incorporating human feedback only when it improves the performance of any feasible predictor. We find empirically that although algorithms often outperform their human counterparts on average, human judgment can significantly improve algorithmic predictions on specific instances (which can be identified ex-ante). In an X-ray classification task, we find that this subset constitutes nearly 30% of the patient population. Our approach provides a natural way of uncovering this heterogeneity and thus enabling effective human-AI collaboration.
Read more5/24/2024