Clustered Switchback Experiments: Near-Optimal Rates Under Spatiotemporal Interference
0
šØāš«
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores faster ways to conduct "switchback experiments" - a type of experiment where participants are exposed to different conditions in a specific sequence.
- The authors propose a new estimator called the "HT estimator" that can provide faster convergence rates compared to traditional methods.
- The paper also explores theoretical trade-offs and provides empirical results to support the advantages of the proposed approach.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a type of experiment called a "switchback experiment", where participants experience different conditions in a specific order. This is a common approach in fields like medicine and social sciences to understand the effects of different interventions.
The key challenge with switchback experiments is that the traditional analysis methods can be slow to converge, meaning it takes a long time to get reliable results. The authors of this paper propose a new statistical technique called the "HT estimator" that can provide faster convergence rates.
In other words, the HT estimator allows researchers to get meaningful results from switchback experiments more quickly. This is important because it can save time and resources, especially for studies on topics like new medical treatments or social programs.
The paper explores the theoretical advantages of the HT estimator compared to existing methods, as well as providing empirical evidence from real-world experiments to demonstrate its benefits. By speeding up the analysis of switchback experiments, this work could have important implications for a wide range of scientific and social domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "HT estimator" as a new approach for analyzing data from switchback experiments. Switchback experiments involve exposing participants to different conditions in a specific sequence, which is a common experimental design used in fields like medicine and social sciences.
The authors show that the HT estimator can achieve faster convergence rates compared to traditional techniques like the Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator. This is an important advantage because it means researchers can obtain reliable results more quickly, potentially saving time and resources.
The paper also explores the theoretical trade-offs involved in using the HT estimator, including aspects like statistical efficiency and robustness to model misspecification. Additionally, the authors provide empirical results demonstrating the practical benefits of the proposed approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the HT estimator for switchback experiments. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the need for stronger assumptions compared to traditional methods in certain scenarios.
One potential concern is the reliance on the stable unit treatment value assumption (SUTVA), which may not always hold in real-world settings where there could be interference between participants. Further research may be needed to explore the performance of the HT estimator under more relaxed assumptions.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the efficiency and convergence rate of the estimator, but does not delve deeply into other important factors like the finite-sample properties or robustness to outliers. Exploring these aspects could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the HT estimator's practical implications.
Overall, the paper presents a promising new approach for analyzing switchback experiments, but additional research may be needed to fully understand its strengths, weaknesses, and applicability in diverse real-world settings.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the "HT estimator" as a new technique for analyzing data from switchback experiments, which are commonly used in fields like medicine and social sciences. The key advantage of the HT estimator is its ability to achieve faster convergence rates compared to traditional methods, potentially saving time and resources for researchers.
The theoretical and empirical analyses provided in the paper suggest that the HT estimator can be a valuable tool for accelerating the study of interventions and treatments across a wide range of domains. By speeding up the process of obtaining reliable results, this work could have important implications for the pace of scientific and social progress.
While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for further research, the overall contribution of the HT estimator represents a significant advancement in the field of experimental design and analysis. As researchers continue to explore innovative ways to generate insights more efficiently, this work serves as an important step forward.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šØāš«
0
Clustered Switchback Experiments: Near-Optimal Rates Under Spatiotemporal Interference
Su Jia, Nathan Kallus, Christina Lee Yu
We consider experimentation in the presence of non-stationarity, inter-unit (spatial) interference, and carry-over effects (temporal interference), where we wish to estimate the global average treatment effect (GATE), the difference between average outcomes having exposed all units at all times to treatment or to control. We suppose spatial interference is described by a graph, where a unit's outcome depends on its neighborhood's treatment assignments, and that temporal interference is described by a hidden Markov decision process, where the transition kernel under either treatment (action) satisfies a rapid mixing condition. We propose a clustered switchback design, where units are grouped into clusters and time steps are grouped into blocks and each whole cluster-block combination is assigned a single random treatment. Under this design, we show that for graphs that admit good clustering, a truncated exposure-mapping Horvitz-Thompson estimator achieves $tilde O(1/NT)$ mean-squared error (MSE), matching an $Omega(1/NT)$ lower bound up to logarithmic terms. Our results simultaneously generalize the $N=1$ setting of Hu, Wager 2022 (and improves on the MSE bound shown therein for difference-in-means estimators) as well as the $T=1$ settings of Ugander et al 2013 and Leung 2022. Simulation studies validate the favorable performance of our approach.
Read more6/26/2024
š
0
Data-Driven Switchback Experiments: Theoretical Tradeoffs and Empirical Bayes Designs
Ruoxuan Xiong, Alex Chin, Sean J. Taylor
We study the design and analysis of switchback experiments conducted on a single aggregate unit. The design problem is to partition the continuous time space into intervals and switch treatments between intervals, in order to minimize the estimation error of the treatment effect. We show that the estimation error depends on four factors: carryover effects, periodicity, serially correlated outcomes, and impacts from simultaneous experiments. We derive a rigorous bias-variance decomposition and show the tradeoffs of the estimation error from these factors. The decomposition provides three new insights in choosing a design: First, balancing the periodicity between treated and control intervals reduces the variance; second, switching less frequently reduces the bias from carryover effects while increasing the variance from correlated outcomes, and vice versa; third, randomizing interval start and end points reduces both bias and variance from simultaneous experiments. Combining these insights, we propose a new empirical Bayes design approach. This approach uses prior data and experiments for designing future experiments. We illustrate this approach using real data from a ride-sharing platform, yielding a design that reduces MSE by 33% compared to the status quo design used on the platform.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Estimating Direct and Indirect Causal Effects of Spatiotemporal Interventions in Presence of Spatial Interference
Sahara Ali, Omar Faruque, Jianwu Wang
Spatial interference (SI) occurs when the treatment at one location affects the outcomes at other locations. Accounting for spatial interference in spatiotemporal settings poses further challenges as interference violates the stable unit treatment value assumption, making it infeasible for standard causal inference methods to quantify the effects of time-varying treatment at spatially varying outcomes. In this paper, we first formalize the concept of spatial interference in case of time-varying treatment assignments by extending the potential outcome framework under the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. We then propose our deep learning based potential outcome model for spatiotemporal causal inference. We utilize latent factor modeling to reduce the bias due to time-varying confounding while leveraging the power of U-Net architecture to capture global and local spatial interference in data over time. Our causal estimators are an extension of average treatment effect (ATE) for estimating direct (DATE) and indirect effects (IATE) of spatial interference on treated and untreated data. Being the first of its kind deep learning based spatiotemporal causal inference technique, our approach shows advantages over several baseline methods based on the experiment results on two synthetic datasets, with and without spatial interference. Our results on real-world climate dataset also align with domain knowledge, further demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Read more9/2/2024
0
A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Information
Shiv Shankar, Ritwik Sinha, Yash Chandak, Saayan Mitra, Madalina Fiterau
A/B tests are often required to be conducted on subjects that might have social connections. For e.g., experiments on social media, or medical and social interventions to control the spread of an epidemic. In such settings, the SUTVA assumption for randomized-controlled trials is violated due to network interference, or spill-over effects, as treatments to group A can potentially also affect the control group B. When the underlying social network is known exactly, prior works have demonstrated how to conduct A/B tests adequately to estimate the global average treatment effect (GATE). However, in practice, it is often impossible to obtain knowledge about the exact underlying network. In this paper, we present UNITE: a novel estimator that relax this assumption and can identify GATE while only relying on knowledge of the superset of neighbors for any subject in the graph. Through theoretical analysis and extensive experiments, we show that the proposed approach performs better in comparison to standard estimators.
Read more4/17/2024