Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Read original: arXiv:2406.11940 - Published 6/19/2024 by Steven Wilkins Reeves, Shane Lubold, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Tyler H. McCormick
Total Score

0

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a model-based approach for estimating causal effects under the presence of interference using partial network data.
  • It introduces a novel experimental design called Cascade-Based Randomization that can improve the power of causal inference.
  • The proposed methods are applicable to a wide range of settings, including AB testing under interference and uplift modeling with limited supervision.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles a common challenge in causal inference - the presence of interference, where the treatment of one individual affects the outcomes of others. This is particularly relevant in social networks, where the actions of one person can influence their friends and connections.

The researchers developed a model-based approach that can estimate causal effects, even when we only have partial information about the underlying network structure. This is an important advancement, as complete network data is often difficult or impossible to obtain in practice.

The key idea is to use a novel experimental design called Cascade-Based Randomization. This approach strategically assigns treatments to individuals in a way that amplifies the observable interference effects, making it easier to tease apart the direct and indirect causal channels.

The proposed methods have broad applicability. For example, they can be used to improve the design and analysis of A/B tests in the presence of interference. They can also be applied to uplift modeling problems, where the goal is to identify individuals who are most responsive to a particular treatment or intervention.

Technical Explanation

The paper develops a model-based approach for causal inference under interference using partial network data. The key components are:

  1. Causal Model: The authors propose a flexible causal model that captures both direct and indirect (interference) effects. This model can accommodate various types of outcome variables, including binary, continuous, and count data.

  2. Experimental Design: The researchers introduce a novel design called Cascade-Based Randomization, which strategically assigns treatments to individuals in a way that amplifies the observable interference effects.

  3. Inference Procedure: The paper presents a computationally efficient inference procedure that can accurately estimate the causal parameters, even when only partial network information is available. This builds on recent advances in doubly robust causal effect estimation under interference.

  4. Theoretical Guarantees: The authors establish theoretical guarantees on the performance of their approach, including consistency and asymptotic normality of the causal effect estimates.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the field of causal inference under interference. The model-based approach is flexible and can accommodate a wide range of data types and network structures, which is a significant advancement over previous methods.

One potential limitation is the reliance on partial network information. While the authors show that their approach can still perform well in this setting, the accuracy of the estimates may be sensitive to the quality and completeness of the available network data. Further research could explore ways to robustly handle missing or noisy network information.

Additionally, the Cascade-Based Randomization design may not be feasible or practical in all real-world settings. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that their methods can also be applied to other experimental designs, such as spatiotemporal interventions. Investigating the performance of their approach under different experimental constraints would be a valuable direction for future work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel model-based framework for causal inference under interference using partial network data. The key contributions are the development of a flexible causal model, a strategic experimental design called Cascade-Based Randomization, and a computationally efficient inference procedure with strong theoretical guarantees.

The proposed methods have broad applicability, including in the areas of A/B testing, uplift modeling, and spatiotemporal interventions. By addressing the challenge of interference and partial network information, this work represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference, with potential applications in marketing, public health, and social science research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data
Total Score

0

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Steven Wilkins Reeves, Shane Lubold, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Tyler H. McCormick

The stable unit treatment value assumption states that the outcome of an individual is not affected by the treatment statuses of others, however in many real world applications, treatments can have an effect on many others beyond the immediately treated. Interference can generically be thought of as mediated through some network structure. In many empirically relevant situations however, complete network data (required to adjust for these spillover effects) are too costly or logistically infeasible to collect. Partially or indirectly observed network data (e.g., subsamples, aggregated relational data (ARD), egocentric sampling, or respondent-driven sampling) reduce the logistical and financial burden of collecting network data, but the statistical properties of treatment effect adjustments from these design strategies are only beginning to be explored. In this paper, we present a framework for the estimation and inference of treatment effect adjustments using partial network data through the lens of structural causal models. We also illustrate procedures to assign treatments using only partial network data, with the goal of either minimizing estimator variance or optimally seeding. We derive single network asymptotic results applicable to a variety of choices for an underlying graph model. We validate our approach using simulated experiments on observed graphs with applications to information diffusion in India and Malawi.

Read more

6/19/2024

A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Information
Total Score

0

A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Information

Shiv Shankar, Ritwik Sinha, Yash Chandak, Saayan Mitra, Madalina Fiterau

A/B tests are often required to be conducted on subjects that might have social connections. For e.g., experiments on social media, or medical and social interventions to control the spread of an epidemic. In such settings, the SUTVA assumption for randomized-controlled trials is violated due to network interference, or spill-over effects, as treatments to group A can potentially also affect the control group B. When the underlying social network is known exactly, prior works have demonstrated how to conduct A/B tests adequately to estimate the global average treatment effect (GATE). However, in practice, it is often impossible to obtain knowledge about the exact underlying network. In this paper, we present UNITE: a novel estimator that relax this assumption and can identify GATE while only relying on knowledge of the superset of neighbors for any subject in the graph. Through theoretical analysis and extensive experiments, we show that the proposed approach performs better in comparison to standard estimators.

Read more

4/17/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Cascade-based Randomization for Inferring Causal Effects under Diffusion Interference

Zahra Fatemi, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Elena Zheleva

The presence of interference, where the outcome of an individual may depend on the treatment assignment and behavior of neighboring nodes, can lead to biased causal effect estimation. Current approaches to network experiment design focus on limiting interference through cluster-based randomization, in which clusters are identified using graph clustering, and cluster randomization dictates the node assignment to treatment and control. However, cluster-based randomization approaches perform poorly when interference propagates in cascades, whereby the response of individuals to treatment propagates to their multi-hop neighbors. When we have knowledge of the cascade seed nodes, we can leverage this interference structure to mitigate the resulting causal effect estimation bias. With this goal, we propose a cascade-based network experiment design that initiates treatment assignment from the cascade seed node and propagates the assignment to their multi-hop neighbors to limit interference during cascade growth and thereby reduce the overall causal effect estimation error. Our extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms the existing state-of-the-art approaches in estimating causal effects in network data.

Read more

5/22/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influence

Shishir Adhikari, Elena Zheleva

Causal inference in networks should account for interference, which occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced by treatments or outcomes of peers. Heterogeneous peer influence (HPI) occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced differently by different peers based on their attributes and relationships, or when each unit has a different susceptibility to peer influence. Existing solutions to estimating direct causal effects under interference consider either homogeneous influence from peers or specific heterogeneous influence mechanisms (e.g., based on local neighborhood structure). This paper presents a methodology for estimating individual direct causal effects in the presence of HPI where the mechanism of influence is not known a priori. We propose a structural causal model for networks that can capture different possible assumptions about network structure, interference conditions, and causal dependence and enables reasoning about identifiability in the presence of HPI. We find potential heterogeneous contexts using the causal model and propose a novel graph neural network-based estimator to estimate individual direct causal effects. We show that state-of-the-art methods for individual direct effect estimation produce biased results in the presence of HPI, and that our proposed estimator is robust.

Read more

8/29/2024