CNN-based explanation ensembling for dataset, representation and explanations evaluation
2404.10387
0
0
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence has gained significant attention due to the widespread use of complex deep learning models in high-stake domains such as medicine, finance, and autonomous cars. However, different explanations often present different aspects of the model's behavior. In this research manuscript, we explore the potential of ensembling explanations generated by deep classification models using convolutional model. Through experimentation and analysis, we aim to investigate the implications of combining explanations to uncover a more coherent and reliable patterns of the model's behavior, leading to the possibility of evaluating the representation learned by the model. With our method, we can uncover problems of under-representation of images in a certain class. Moreover, we discuss other side benefits like features' reduction by replacing the original image with its explanations resulting in the removal of some sensitive information. Through the use of carefully selected evaluation metrics from the Quantus library, we demonstrated the method's superior performance in terms of Localisation and Faithfulness, compared to individual explanations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a CNN-based approach for ensembling explanations of deep learning models to evaluate datasets, representations, and model explanations.
- The method combines multiple explanation techniques to provide a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of model performance and behavior.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various benchmark datasets and models, including Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Mammography, Comparing Decision-Making Mechanisms by Transformers and CNNs, and Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to evaluate deep learning models by combining different explanation techniques. Explanations are tools that help us understand how a deep learning model makes its decisions. The authors' approach uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) to combine multiple explanation methods, like Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Factors and Advancing Ante-hoc Explainable Models through Generative Adversarial Training. This allows for a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of the model's performance and behavior. The authors show that their approach works well on various datasets and models, including those related to medical imaging and decision-making. The key idea is to use multiple explanation techniques together to get a better understanding of how a deep learning model works.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a CNN-based explanation ensembling approach to evaluate datasets, representations, and model explanations. The method combines multiple explanation techniques, such as gradient-based, perturbation-based, and example-based explanations, to provide a more comprehensive assessment of a deep learning model's performance and behavior.
The authors first extract multiple explanations for a given model and input using various explanation techniques. They then feed these explanations into a CNN-based ensemble model, which learns to aggregate the explanations and produce a unified explanation. This unified explanation can be used to evaluate the dataset, the model's internal representations, and the quality of the individual explanations.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and models, including those related to medical imaging and decision-making. They show that their method can effectively identify dataset biases, evaluate the meaningfulness of the model's representations, and assess the reliability of different explanation techniques.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a robust and versatile approach for evaluating deep learning models using explanation ensembling. By combining multiple explanation techniques, the method can offer a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of model performance and behavior.
One potential limitation of the approach is its reliance on the availability and quality of the individual explanation techniques. If the underlying explanations are biased or unreliable, the ensemble model may not be able to fully compensate for these issues. Additionally, the authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the computational cost or scalability of their approach, which could be an important consideration for real-world applications.
Moreover, the paper does not explore the potential for adversarial attacks or other forms of model manipulation that could undermine the explanation ensembling approach. It would be valuable to investigate the robustness of the method in the face of such challenges.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for improving the interpretability and trustworthiness of deep learning models. However, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel CNN-based explanation ensembling approach to evaluate deep learning models, datasets, and explanations. By combining multiple explanation techniques, the method offers a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of model performance and behavior.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various benchmark datasets and models, highlighting its potential to identify dataset biases, evaluate the meaningfulness of internal representations, and assess the quality of individual explanations. While the paper presents a promising direction, future research should explore the method's limitations, investigate its robustness to adversarial attacks, and consider the broader implications for improving the trustworthiness of deep learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Solving the enigma: Deriving optimal explanations of deep networks
Michail Mamalakis, Antonios Mamalakis, Ingrid Agartz, Lynn Egeland M{o}rch-Johnsen, Graham Murray, John Suckling, Pietro Lio
0
0
The accelerated progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has popularized deep learning models across domains, yet their inherent opacity poses challenges, notably in critical fields like healthcare, medicine and the geosciences. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to shed light on these black box models, helping decipher their decision making process. Nevertheless, different XAI methods yield highly different explanations. This inter-method variability increases uncertainty and lowers trust in deep networks' predictions. In this study, for the first time, we propose a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks, by maximizing both the accuracy and the comprehensibility of the explanations. Our framework integrates various explanations from established XAI methods and employs a non-linear explanation optimizer to construct a unique and optimal explanation. Through experiments on multi-class and binary classification tasks in 2D object and 3D neuroscience imaging, we validate the efficacy of our approach. Our explanation optimizer achieved superior faithfulness scores, averaging 155% and 63% higher than the best performing XAI method in the 3D and 2D applications, respectively. Additionally, our approach yielded lower complexity, increasing comprehensibility. Our results suggest that optimal explanations based on specific criteria are derivable and address the issue of inter-method variability in the current XAI literature.
5/17/2024
Accurate Explanation Model for Image Classifiers using Class Association Embedding
Ruitao Xie, Jingbang Chen, Limai Jiang, Rui Xiao, Yi Pan, Yunpeng Cai
0
0
Image classification is a primary task in data analysis where explainable models are crucially demanded in various applications. Although amounts of methods have been proposed to obtain explainable knowledge from the black-box classifiers, these approaches lack the efficiency of extracting global knowledge regarding the classification task, thus is vulnerable to local traps and often leads to poor accuracy. In this study, we propose a generative explanation model that combines the advantages of global and local knowledge for explaining image classifiers. We develop a representation learning method called class association embedding (CAE), which encodes each sample into a pair of separated class-associated and individual codes. Recombining the individual code of a given sample with altered class-associated code leads to a synthetic real-looking sample with preserved individual characters but modified class-associated features and possibly flipped class assignments. A building-block coherency feature extraction algorithm is proposed that efficiently separates class-associated features from individual ones. The extracted feature space forms a low-dimensional manifold that visualizes the classification decision patterns. Explanation on each individual sample can be then achieved in a counter-factual generation manner which continuously modifies the sample in one direction, by shifting its class-associated code along a guided path, until its classification outcome is changed. We compare our method with state-of-the-art ones on explaining image classification tasks in the form of saliency maps, demonstrating that our method achieves higher accuracies. The code is available at https://github.com/xrt11/XAI-CODE.
6/13/2024
Interpretable Network Visualizations: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach for Post-hoc Explainability of CNN-based Image Classification
Matteo Bianchi, Antonio De Santis, Andrea Tocchetti, Marco Brambilla
0
0
Transparency and explainability in image classification are essential for establishing trust in machine learning models and detecting biases and errors. State-of-the-art explainability methods generate saliency maps to show where a specific class is identified, without providing a detailed explanation of the model's decision process. Striving to address such a need, we introduce a post-hoc method that explains the entire feature extraction process of a Convolutional Neural Network. These explanations include a layer-wise representation of the features the model extracts from the input. Such features are represented as saliency maps generated by clustering and merging similar feature maps, to which we associate a weight derived by generalizing Grad-CAM for the proposed methodology. To further enhance these explanations, we include a set of textual labels collected through a gamified crowdsourcing activity and processed using NLP techniques and Sentence-BERT. Finally, we show an approach to generate global explanations by aggregating labels across multiple images.
5/7/2024
Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Mammography: Evaluation and Integration of Convolutional Neural Networks and Explainable AI
Maryam Ahmed, Tooba Bibi, Rizwan Ahmed Khan, Sidra Nasir
0
0
The Deep learning (DL) models for diagnosing breast cancer from mammographic images often operate as black boxes, making it difficult for healthcare professionals to trust and understand their decision-making processes. The study presents an integrated framework combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for the enhanced diagnosis of breast cancer using the CBIS-DDSM dataset. The methodology encompasses an elaborate data preprocessing pipeline and advanced data augmentation techniques to counteract dataset limitations and transfer learning using pre-trained networks such as VGG-16, Inception-V3 and ResNet was employed. A focal point of our study is the evaluation of XAI's effectiveness in interpreting model predictions, highlighted by utilizing the Hausdorff measure to assess the alignment between AI-generated explanations and expert annotations quantitatively. This approach is critical for XAI in promoting trustworthiness and ethical fairness in AI-assisted diagnostics. The findings from our research illustrate the effective collaboration between CNNs and XAI in advancing diagnostic methods for breast cancer, thereby facilitating a more seamless integration of advanced AI technologies within clinical settings. By enhancing the interpretability of AI driven decisions, this work lays the groundwork for improved collaboration between AI systems and medical practitioners, ultimately enriching patient care. Furthermore, the implications of our research extended well beyond the current methodologies. It encourages further research into how to combine multimodal data and improve AI explanations to meet the needs of clinical practice.
4/30/2024