CNN2GNN: How to Bridge CNN with GNN
2404.14822
0
0
👁️
Abstract
Although the convolutional neural network (CNN) has achieved excellent performance in vision tasks by extracting the intra-sample representation, it will take a higher training expense because of stacking numerous convolutional layers. Recently, as the bilinear models, graph neural networks (GNN) have succeeded in exploring the underlying topological relationship among the graph data with a few graph neural layers. Unfortunately, it cannot be directly utilized on non-graph data due to the lack of graph structure and has high inference latency on large-scale scenarios. Inspired by these complementary strengths and weaknesses, textit{we discuss a natural question, how to bridge these two heterogeneous networks?} In this paper, we propose a novel CNN2GNN framework to unify CNN and GNN together via distillation. Firstly, to break the limitations of GNN, a differentiable sparse graph learning module is designed as the head of networks to dynamically learn the graph for inductive learning. Then, a response-based distillation is introduced to transfer the knowledge from CNN to GNN and bridge these two heterogeneous networks. Notably, due to extracting the intra-sample representation of a single instance and the topological relationship among the datasets simultaneously, the performance of distilled ``boosted'' two-layer GNN on Mini-ImageNet is much higher than CNN containing dozens of layers such as ResNet152.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are powerful for vision tasks, but require many layers and high training costs
- Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can efficiently explore topological relationships in graph data, but struggle with non-graph data
- The paper proposes a novel CNN2GNN framework to unify CNNs and GNNs through knowledge distillation
- The key contributions are a differentiable sparse graph learning module and a response-based distillation method to transfer knowledge from CNNs to GNNs
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to combine the strengths of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
CNNs are very good at extracting relevant features from visual data, but require many layers and a lot of training data to perform well. GNNs, on the other hand, can efficiently explore the underlying relationships in graph-structured data using just a few layers. However, GNNs struggle when the data doesn't have a clear graph structure, like images.
The researchers propose a new framework called CNN2GNN that tries to combine the strengths of both approaches. First, they design a "differentiable sparse graph learning module" that can dynamically learn a graph representation from non-graph data like images. Then, they use a "response-based distillation" technique to transfer the knowledge learned by a large, powerful CNN to a smaller, simpler GNN.
The key insight is that by extracting both the individual features of a data sample and the relationships between samples, the distilled GNN can achieve higher performance than a very deep CNN, even though the GNN only has two layers. This suggests that the CNN2GNN framework can be an efficient way to leverage the strengths of both neural network architectures.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose the CNN2GNN framework to unify Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) through a knowledge distillation process.
The key components of the framework are:
-
Differentiable Sparse Graph Learning Module: This module is designed as the head of the network to dynamically learn a graph representation from non-graph data like images. This overcomes the limitation of traditional GNNs that require explicit graph structures.
-
Response-based Distillation: This technique is used to transfer the knowledge learned by a powerful CNN model to a simpler, two-layer GNN model. The distillation is based on matching the responses (outputs) of the two models, rather than simply mimicking the CNN's weights.
By combining these two components, the CNN2GNN framework can extract both the intra-sample representations (like a CNN) and the topological relationships between samples (like a GNN). Experiments on the Mini-ImageNet dataset show that the distilled two-layer GNN model can outperform a much deeper ResNet152 CNN model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach.
Critical Analysis
The CNN2GNN framework presents an innovative way to leverage the complementary strengths of CNNs and GNNs. The use of a differentiable graph learning module is a clever solution to the limitation of traditional GNNs requiring explicit graph structures.
However, the paper does not provide much insight into the training process or hyperparameter tuning for the graph learning module. It's also unclear how the framework would scale to larger, more complex datasets or domains beyond image classification.
Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on a single dataset (Mini-ImageNet). Further testing on a wider range of benchmarks would be needed to fully assess the generalizability and robustness of the CNN2GNN framework.
While the response-based distillation technique appears promising, the authors do not provide a detailed comparison to other distillation methods. It would be valuable to understand how this approach compares to alternative knowledge transfer techniques.
Overall, the CNN2GNN framework represents an interesting step towards bridging the gap between CNNs and GNNs, but more research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
The CNN2GNN framework proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to unifying the strengths of Convolutional Neural Networks and Graph Neural Networks. By introducing a differentiable graph learning module and a response-based distillation method, the researchers demonstrate that a simpler GNN model can outperform a much deeper CNN model on image classification tasks.
This work suggests that combining the intra-sample representation learning of CNNs with the topological relationship exploration of GNNs can lead to more efficient and effective neural network architectures. As the field of deep learning continues to evolve, techniques like CNN2GNN that bridge the gap between different model types may become increasingly important for advancing the state-of-the-art in a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
TransGNN: Harnessing the Collaborative Power of Transformers and Graph Neural Networks for Recommender Systems
Peiyan Zhang, Yuchen Yan, Xi Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Senzhang Wang, Feiran Huang, Sunghun Kim
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as promising solutions for collaborative filtering (CF) through the modeling of user-item interaction graphs. The nucleus of existing GNN-based recommender systems involves recursive message passing along user-item interaction edges to refine encoded embeddings. Despite their demonstrated effectiveness, current GNN-based methods encounter challenges of limited receptive fields and the presence of noisy interest-irrelevant connections. In contrast, Transformer-based methods excel in aggregating information adaptively and globally. Nevertheless, their application to large-scale interaction graphs is hindered by inherent complexities and challenges in capturing intricate, entangled structural information. In this paper, we propose TransGNN, a novel model that integrates Transformer and GNN layers in an alternating fashion to mutually enhance their capabilities. Specifically, TransGNN leverages Transformer layers to broaden the receptive field and disentangle information aggregation from edges, which aggregates information from more relevant nodes, thereby enhancing the message passing of GNNs. Additionally, to capture graph structure information effectively, positional encoding is meticulously designed and integrated into GNN layers to encode such structural knowledge into node attributes, thus enhancing the Transformer's performance on graphs. Efficiency considerations are also alleviated by proposing the sampling of the most relevant nodes for the Transformer, along with two efficient sample update strategies to reduce complexity. Furthermore, theoretical analysis demonstrates that TransGNN offers increased expressiveness compared to GNNs, with only a marginal increase in linear complexity. Extensive experiments on five public datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of TransGNN.
5/21/2024
🧠
Graph Neural Networks in Vision-Language Image Understanding: A Survey
Henry Senior, Gregory Slabaugh, Shanxin Yuan, Luca Rossi
0
0
2D image understanding is a complex problem within computer vision, but it holds the key to providing human-level scene comprehension. It goes further than identifying the objects in an image, and instead, it attempts to understand the scene. Solutions to this problem form the underpinning of a range of tasks, including image captioning, visual question answering (VQA), and image retrieval. Graphs provide a natural way to represent the relational arrangement between objects in an image, and thus, in recent years graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a standard component of many 2D image understanding pipelines, becoming a core architectural component, especially in the VQA group of tasks. In this survey, we review this rapidly evolving field and we provide a taxonomy of graph types used in 2D image understanding approaches, a comprehensive list of the GNN models used in this domain, and a roadmap of future potential developments. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive survey that covers image captioning, visual question answering, and image retrieval techniques that focus on using GNNs as the main part of their architecture.
4/15/2024
🧠
New!Graph in Graph Neural Network
Jiongshu Wang, Jing Yang, Jiankang Deng, Hatice Gunes, Siyang Song
0
0
Existing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are limited to process graphs each of whose vertices is represented by a vector or a single value, limited their representing capability to describe complex objects. In this paper, we propose the first GNN (called Graph in Graph Neural (GIG) Network) which can process graph-style data (called GIG sample) whose vertices are further represented by graphs. Given a set of graphs or a data sample whose components can be represented by a set of graphs (called multi-graph data sample), our GIG network starts with a GIG sample generation (GSG) module which encodes the input as a textbf{GIG sample}, where each GIG vertex includes a graph. Then, a set of GIG hidden layers are stacked, with each consisting of: (1) a GIG vertex-level updating (GVU) module that individually updates the graph in every GIG vertex based on its internal information; and (2) a global-level GIG sample updating (GGU) module that updates graphs in all GIG vertices based on their relationships, making the updated GIG vertices become global context-aware. This way, both internal cues within the graph contained in each GIG vertex and the relationships among GIG vertices could be utilized for down-stream tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that our GIG network generalizes well for not only various generic graph analysis tasks but also real-world multi-graph data analysis (e.g., human skeleton video-based action recognition), which achieved the new state-of-the-art results on 13 out of 14 evaluated datasets. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/wangjs96/Graph-in-Graph-Neural-Network.
7/2/2024
A survey of dynamic graph neural networks
Yanping Zheng, Lu Yi, Zhewei Wei
0
0
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for effectively mining and learning from graph-structured data, with applications spanning numerous domains. However, most research focuses on static graphs, neglecting the dynamic nature of real-world networks where topologies and attributes evolve over time. By integrating sequence modeling modules into traditional GNN architectures, dynamic GNNs aim to bridge this gap, capturing the inherent temporal dependencies of dynamic graphs for a more authentic depiction of complex networks. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the fundamental concepts, key techniques, and state-of-the-art dynamic GNN models. We present the mainstream dynamic GNN models in detail and categorize models based on how temporal information is incorporated. We also discuss large-scale dynamic GNNs and pre-training techniques. Although dynamic GNNs have shown superior performance, challenges remain in scalability, handling heterogeneous information, and lack of diverse graph datasets. The paper also discusses possible future directions, such as adaptive and memory-enhanced models, inductive learning, and theoretical analysis.
4/30/2024