Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how people with mobility disabilities, robotic practitioners, and their collaborations can inform the design of accessible public robots.
- The researchers conducted interviews and co-design workshops to understand the perspectives and needs of these diverse stakeholders.
- Key insights were generated around accessibility, safety, and social considerations for the development of public service robots.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how people with disabilities, experts who design robots, and their joint efforts can help create public service robots that are accessible to everyone. The researchers talked to and worked with these different groups to understand their views and requirements for such robots. This led to important insights about making these robots easy to use for people with limited mobility, keeping them safe, and considering how they interact with the public.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study that aimed to co-design accessible public robots by engaging people with mobility disabilities, robotic practitioners, and facilitating their collaboration. The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 individuals with mobility disabilities and 9 robotic practitioners to understand their perspectives and needs. They then held two co-design workshops where the two groups worked together to generate design ideas and insights.
The interviews revealed that people with mobility disabilities were concerned about the accessibility, safety, and social acceptance of public robots. They wanted robots to be maneuverable, have clear interfaces, and avoid obstructing pathways. Robotic practitioners highlighted technical challenges around sensors, navigation, and human-robot interaction for public settings.
The co-design workshops allowed the two groups to jointly ideate solutions. Participants envisioned robots that could navigate around obstacles, have adjustable heights, and provide clear status updates. They also discussed the importance of robots being approachable, respectful of personal space, and integrated seamlessly into public environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by incorporating the perspectives of people with disabilities and robotic experts to inform the design of accessible public robots. However, the sample sizes for the interviews and workshops were relatively small, so the findings may not fully represent the diversity of views and needs across these stakeholder groups.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential tensions or tradeoffs that may arise when trying to balance the various accessibility, safety, and social requirements. Further research is needed to understand how to optimize the design of public service robots for the widest range of users.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the benefits of co-designing assistive technologies like public service robots with end-users who have disabilities, as well as the experts responsible for developing them. The insights generated can inform the creation of more inclusive, usable, and socially integrated robots that can assist people in public spaces. Continued collaboration between these stakeholders will be crucial as robot technologies become more prevalent in our communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations
Howard Ziyu Han, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Alesandra Baca Vazquez, Daragh Byrne, Nikolas Martelaro, Sarah E Fox
Sidewalk robots are increasingly common across the globe. Yet, their operation on public paths poses challenges for people with mobility disabilities (PwMD) who face barriers to accessibility, such as insufficient curb cuts. We interviewed 15 PwMD to understand how they perceive sidewalk robots. Findings indicated that PwMD feel they have to compete for space on the sidewalk when robots are introduced. We next interviewed eight robotics practitioners to learn about their attitudes towards accessibility. Practitioners described how issues often stem from robotic companies addressing accessibility only after problems arise. Both interview groups underscored the importance of integrating accessibility from the outset. Building on this finding, we held four co-design workshops with PwMD and practitioners in pairs. These convenings brought to bear accessibility needs around robots operating in public spaces and in the public interest. Our study aims to set the stage for a more inclusive future around public service robots.
Read more4/9/2024
🌐
0
Field Notes on Deploying Research Robots in Public Spaces
Fanjun Bu, Alexandra Bremers, Mark Colley, Wendy Ju
Human-robot interaction requires to be studied in the wild. In the summers of 2022 and 2023, we deployed two trash barrel service robots through the wizard-of-oz protocol in public spaces to study human-robot interactions in urban settings. We deployed the robots at two different public plazas in downtown Manhattan and Brooklyn for a collective of 20 hours of field time. To date, relatively few long-term human-robot interaction studies have been conducted in shared public spaces. To support researchers aiming to fill this gap, we would like to share some of our insights and learned lessons that would benefit both researchers and practitioners on how to deploy robots in public spaces. We share best practices and lessons learned with the HRI research community to encourage more in-the-wild research of robots in public spaces and call for the community to share their lessons learned to a GitHub repository.
Read more4/30/2024
0
More than just a Tool: People's Perception and Acceptance of Prosocial Delivery Robots as Fellow Road Users
Vivienne Bihe Chi, Elise Ulwelling, Kevin Salubre, Shashank Mehrotra, Teruhisa Misu, Kumar Akash
Service robots are increasingly deployed in public spaces, performing functional tasks such as making deliveries. To better integrate them into our social environment and enhance their adoption, we consider integrating social identities within delivery robots along with their functional identity. We conducted a virtual reality-based pilot study to explore people's perceptions and acceptance of delivery robots that perform prosocial behavior. Preliminary findings from thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews illustrate people's ambivalence about dual identity. We discussed the emerging themes in light of social identity theory, framing effect, and human-robot intergroup dynamics. Building on these insights, we propose that the next generation of delivery robots should use peer-based framing, an updated value proposition, and an interactive design that places greater emphasis on expressing intentionality and emotional responses.
Read more9/14/2024
0
A participatory design approach to using social robots for elderly care
Barbara Sienkiewicz, Zuzanna Radosz-Knawa, Bipin Indurkhya
We present our ongoing research on applying a participatory design approach to using social robots for elderly care. Our approach involves four different groups of stakeholders: the elderly, (non-professional) caregivers, medical professionals, and psychologists. We focus on card sorting and storyboarding techniques to elicit the concerns of the stakeholders towards deploying social robots for elderly care. This is followed by semi-structured interviews to assess their attitudes towards social robots individually. Then we are conducting two-stage workshops with different elderly groups to understand how to engage them with the technology and to identify the challenges in this task.
Read more4/23/2024