Field Notes on Deploying Research Robots in Public Spaces

Read original: arXiv:2404.18375 - Published 4/30/2024 by Fanjun Bu, Alexandra Bremers, Mark Colley, Wendy Ju
Total Score

0

🌐

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers deployed two trash barrel service robots in public spaces in Manhattan and Brooklyn to study human-robot interactions in urban settings.
  • This study aims to share insights and lessons learned to benefit researchers and practitioners working on deploying robots in public spaces.
  • The researchers call for the HRI community to contribute their own lessons learned to a GitHub repository to encourage more in-the-wild research of robots in public spaces.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to better understand how people interact with robots in real-world public settings, rather than just in controlled lab environments. To do this, they deployed two robot "trash barrel" systems in public plazas in Manhattan and Brooklyn over the course of 2022 and 2023.

These robots were designed to interact with and assist people in public spaces, like collecting trash. By observing how people reacted to and engaged with the robots in these public settings, the researchers hoped to gain valuable insights that would help guide future development of robots for use in shared public spaces.

The researchers acknowledge that there have been relatively few long-term studies of human-robot interaction in actual public environments. So, by sharing the lessons they learned through this work, they aim to provide a helpful resource for other researchers and practitioners who want to deploy robots in the real world, beyond the lab. They also encourage the broader robotics community to contribute their own experiences and learnings to a shared repository, to further advance this area of research.

Technical Explanation

The researchers deployed two "wizard-of-oz" protocol service robots in public plazas in downtown Manhattan and Brooklyn over the summers of 2022 and 2023. This "wizard-of-oz" approach involves a human operator controlling the robot remotely, rather than the robot operating autonomously. The researchers spent a collective 20 hours observing how people interacted with these robots in these shared public spaces.

This study aimed to address the relative lack of long-term human-robot interaction research conducted in real-world public environments, as opposed to controlled lab settings. By sharing the insights and lessons they learned from this field deployment, the researchers hope to provide guidance and encourage more in-the-wild research of robots in public spaces.

The researchers highlight that deploying robots in public spaces presents unique challenges compared to lab-based robotics research. Issues around safety, legibility, and proactive planning must be carefully considered when bringing robots into shared public environments. The researchers also note the importance of co-designing accessible public robots that can effectively serve diverse user needs.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their study is limited by the relatively short duration of the deployments (20 hours total) and the use of a "wizard-of-oz" control scheme rather than fully autonomous operation. These factors may have influenced the nature of the human-robot interactions observed.

Additionally, the study was conducted in urban public plazas in Manhattan and Brooklyn, which may not be representative of all potential public spaces where robots could be deployed, such as construction sites or other specialized environments.

Further research would be needed to validate the generalizability of the insights and lessons learned from this specific deployment scenario. Nonetheless, the researchers' call for the broader HRI community to share their own field experiences is a valuable contribution that can help advance the state of research on real-world human-robot interaction.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the importance of conducting human-robot interaction research in actual public settings, rather than just in controlled lab environments. By deploying service robots in urban public spaces, the researchers were able to gain important insights into the practical challenges and considerations involved in bringing robots into shared human environments.

While the study has some limitations, the researchers' willingness to share their lessons learned is a significant contribution to the field. By encouraging the broader HRI community to contribute their own experiences, the researchers aim to build a valuable resource to guide future efforts in deploying robots in the real world, beyond the confines of the laboratory.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌐

Total Score

0

Field Notes on Deploying Research Robots in Public Spaces

Fanjun Bu, Alexandra Bremers, Mark Colley, Wendy Ju

Human-robot interaction requires to be studied in the wild. In the summers of 2022 and 2023, we deployed two trash barrel service robots through the wizard-of-oz protocol in public spaces to study human-robot interactions in urban settings. We deployed the robots at two different public plazas in downtown Manhattan and Brooklyn for a collective of 20 hours of field time. To date, relatively few long-term human-robot interaction studies have been conducted in shared public spaces. To support researchers aiming to fill this gap, we would like to share some of our insights and learned lessons that would benefit both researchers and practitioners on how to deploy robots in public spaces. We share best practices and lessons learned with the HRI research community to encourage more in-the-wild research of robots in public spaces and call for the community to share their lessons learned to a GitHub repository.

Read more

4/30/2024

Egocentric Robots in a Human-Centric World? Exploring Group-Robot-Interaction in Public Spaces
Total Score

0

Egocentric Robots in a Human-Centric World? Exploring Group-Robot-Interaction in Public Spaces

Ana Muller, Anja Richert

The deployment of social robots in real-world scenarios is increasing, supporting humans in various contexts. However, they still struggle to grasp social dynamics, especially in public spaces, sometimes resulting in violations of social norms, such as interrupting human conversations. This behavior, originating from a limited processing of social norms, might be perceived as robot-centered. Understanding social dynamics, particularly in group-robot-interactions (GRI), underscores the need for further research and development in human-robot-interaction (HRI). Enhancing the interaction abilities of social robots, especially in GRIs, can improve their effectiveness in real-world applications on a micro-level, as group interactions lead to increased motivation and comfort. In this study, we assessed the influence of the interaction condition (dyadic vs. triadic) on the perceived extraversion (ext.) of social robots in public spaces. The research involved 40 HRIs, including 24 dyadic (i.e., one human and one robot) interactions and 16 triadic interactions, which involve at least three entities, including the robot.

Read more

7/26/2024

Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations
Total Score

0

Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations

Howard Ziyu Han, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Alesandra Baca Vazquez, Daragh Byrne, Nikolas Martelaro, Sarah E Fox

Sidewalk robots are increasingly common across the globe. Yet, their operation on public paths poses challenges for people with mobility disabilities (PwMD) who face barriers to accessibility, such as insufficient curb cuts. We interviewed 15 PwMD to understand how they perceive sidewalk robots. Findings indicated that PwMD feel they have to compete for space on the sidewalk when robots are introduced. We next interviewed eight robotics practitioners to learn about their attitudes towards accessibility. Practitioners described how issues often stem from robotic companies addressing accessibility only after problems arise. Both interview groups underscored the importance of integrating accessibility from the outset. Building on this finding, we held four co-design workshops with PwMD and practitioners in pairs. These convenings brought to bear accessibility needs around robots operating in public spaces and in the public interest. Our study aims to set the stage for a more inclusive future around public service robots.

Read more

4/9/2024

Person Transfer in the Field: Examining Real World Sequential Human-Robot Interaction Between Two Robots
Total Score

0

Person Transfer in the Field: Examining Real World Sequential Human-Robot Interaction Between Two Robots

Xiang Zhi Tan, Elizabeth J. Carter, Aaron Steinfeld

With more robots being deployed in the world, users will likely interact with multiple robots sequentially when receiving services. In this paper, we describe an exploratory field study in which unsuspecting participants experienced a ``person transfer'' -- a scenario in which they first interacted with one stationary robot before another mobile robot joined to complete the interaction. In our 7-hour study spanning 4 days, we recorded 18 instances of person transfers with 40+ individuals. We also interviewed 11 participants after the interaction to further understand their experience. We used the recorded video and interview data to extract interesting insights about in-the-field sequential human-robot interaction, such as mobile robot handovers, trust in person transfer, and the importance of the robots' positions. Our findings expose pitfalls and present important factors to consider when designing sequential human-robot interaction.

Read more

6/12/2024