COAST: Constraints and Streams for Task and Motion Planning

2405.08572

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/15/2024 by Brandon Vu, Toki Migimatsu, Jeannette Bohg

๐Ÿงช

Abstract

Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) algorithms solve long-horizon robotics tasks by integrating task planning with motion planning; the task planner proposes a sequence of actions towards a goal state and the motion planner verifies whether this action sequence is geometrically feasible for the robot. However, state-of-the-art TAMP algorithms do not scale well with the difficulty of the task and require an impractical amount of time to solve relatively small problems. We propose Constraints and Streams for Task and Motion Planning (COAST), a probabilistically-complete, sampling-based TAMP algorithm that combines stream-based motion planning with an efficient, constrained task planning strategy. We validate COAST on three challenging TAMP domains and demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines in terms of cumulative task planning time by an order of magnitude. You can find more supplementary materials on our project href{https://branvu.github.io/coast.github.io}{website}.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a new algorithm called Constraints and Streams for Task and Motion Planning (COAST) that addresses the scalability issues of existing task and motion planning (TAMP) algorithms.
  • COAST combines stream-based motion planning with an efficient, constrained task planning strategy to achieve probabilistic completeness and improved performance.
  • The authors validate COAST on three challenging TAMP domains and show that it outperforms baseline methods by an order of magnitude in terms of cumulative task planning time.

Plain English Explanation

Robots often need to perform complex tasks that require both high-level decision-making (task planning) and low-level control of their movements (motion planning). Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning algorithms try to solve these long-horizon robotics tasks by integrating these two components. The task planner proposes a sequence of actions to achieve a goal, and the motion planner verifies whether this sequence is feasible for the robot to execute.

However, the current state-of-the-art TAMP algorithms do not scale well as the tasks become more difficult. They can take an impractically long time to solve even relatively small problems. The paper introduces a new algorithm called COAST that aims to address these scalability issues.

COAST combines two key ideas: stream-based motion planning and an efficient, constrained task planning strategy. The stream-based motion planning allows the algorithm to more effectively explore the robot's range of possible motions, while the constrained task planning helps it find solutions more efficiently.

The authors show that COAST outperforms existing TAMP algorithms by a significant margin on three challenging test scenarios. This suggests that the combination of these two techniques can make TAMP systems much more practical and scalable for real-world robotic applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) algorithm called Constraints and Streams for Task and Motion Planning (COAST) that aims to address the scalability issues of current state-of-the-art TAMP approaches.

COAST combines two key ideas: stream-based motion planning and an efficient, constrained task planning strategy. The stream-based motion planning extends previous work on using a sampling-based approach to explore the robot's range of possible motions. This is integrated with a task planner that uses a constrained search strategy to find solutions more efficiently.

The authors validate COAST on three challenging TAMP domains: block stacking, door opening, and tool use. They compare its performance to several baseline TAMP algorithms, including an optimization-based approach and a factored TAMP method. The results show that COAST outperforms these baselines by an order of magnitude in terms of cumulative task planning time.

The key insight behind COAST is that by combining stream-based motion planning with an efficient, constrained task planning strategy, the algorithm can achieve probabilistic completeness while also scaling better to more difficult problems. The stream-based motion planning helps the system more effectively explore the robot's range of possible motions, while the constrained task planning avoids getting stuck in unproductive search paths.

Critical Analysis

The authors of the paper acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work. First, COAST currently relies on a tight coupling between the task and motion planning components, which may limit its flexibility and applicability to a wider range of robotic systems. Unconstrained Multi-Robot Manipulation techniques could potentially be used to address this issue.

Additionally, the paper focuses on single-robot scenarios, and it is unclear how well COAST would scale to more complex, multi-robot tasks. Further research would be needed to extend the algorithm to these more challenging domains.

Another potential concern is the reliance on a priori knowledge about the task and environment, which may not always be available in real-world applications. Techniques that can learn or adapt to novel situations could improve the algorithm's robustness and versatility.

Overall, the COAST algorithm represents a promising step forward in addressing the scalability challenges of TAMP systems. However, additional research and development will be necessary to make the approach more flexible, generalizable, and suitable for a broader range of robotic applications.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a new Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) algorithm called COAST that combines stream-based motion planning with an efficient, constrained task planning strategy. The authors demonstrate that COAST significantly outperforms existing TAMP algorithms on a range of challenging test scenarios, suggesting that the integration of these two techniques can lead to more scalable and practical TAMP systems for real-world robotic applications.

While COAST represents an important advancement in the field, the authors acknowledge several limitations that warrant further research, such as the tight coupling between task and motion planning, the focus on single-robot scenarios, and the reliance on a priori knowledge. Addressing these issues could help make COAST and similar TAMP algorithms more flexible, generalizable, and suitable for a broader range of robotic tasks and environments.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approaches

A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approaches

Zhigen Zhao, Shuo Cheng, Yan Ding, Ziyi Zhou, Shiqi Zhang, Danfei Xu, Ye Zhao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) integrates high-level task planning and low-level motion planning to equip robots with the autonomy to effectively reason over long-horizon, dynamic tasks. Optimization-based TAMP focuses on hybrid optimization approaches that define goal conditions via objective functions and are capable of handling open-ended goals, robotic dynamics, and physical interaction between the robot and the environment. Therefore, optimization-based TAMP is particularly suited to solve highly complex, contact-rich locomotion and manipulation problems. This survey provides a comprehensive review on optimization-based TAMP, covering (i) planning domain representations, including action description languages and temporal logic, (ii) individual solution strategies for components of TAMP, including AI planning and trajectory optimization (TO), and (iii) the dynamic interplay between logic-based task planning and model-based TO. A particular focus of this survey is to highlight the algorithm structures to efficiently solve TAMP, especially hierarchical and distributed approaches. Additionally, the survey emphasizes the synergy between the classical methods and contemporary learning-based innovations such as large language models. Furthermore, the future research directions for TAMP is discussed in this survey, highlighting both algorithmic and application-specific challenges.

Read more

4/22/2024

๐Ÿคฟ

Factored Task and Motion Planning with Combined Optimization, Sampling and Learning

Joaquim Ortiz-Haro

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this thesis, we aim to improve the performance of TAMP algorithms from three complementary perspectives. First, we investigate the integration of discrete task planning with continuous trajectory optimization. Our main contribution is a conflict-based solver that automatically discovers why a task plan might fail when considering the constraints of the physical world. This information is then fed back into the task planner, resulting in an efficient, bidirectional, and intuitive interface between task and motion, capable of solving TAMP problems with multiple objects, robots, and tight physical constraints. In the second part, we first illustrate that, given the wide range of tasks and environments within TAMP, neither sampling nor optimization is superior in all settings. To combine the strengths of both approaches, we have designed meta-solvers for TAMP, adaptive solvers that automatically select which algorithms and computations to use and how to best decompose each problem to find a solution faster. In the third part, we combine deep learning architectures with model-based reasoning to accelerate computations within our TAMP solver. Specifically, we target infeasibility detection and nonlinear optimization, focusing on generalization, accuracy, compute time, and data efficiency. At the core of our contributions is a refined, factored representation of the trajectory optimization problems inside TAMP. This structure not only facilitates more efficient planning, encoding of geometric infeasibility, and meta-reasoning but also provides better generalization in neural architectures.

Read more

4/5/2024

Toward Holistic Planning and Control Optimization for Dual-Arm Rearrangement

Toward Holistic Planning and Control Optimization for Dual-Arm Rearrangement

Kai Gao, Zihe Ye, Duo Zhang, Baichuan Huang, Jingjin Yu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Long-horizon task and motion planning (TAMP) is notoriously difficult to solve, let alone optimally, due to the tight coupling between the interleaved (discrete) task and (continuous) motion planning phases, where each phase on its own is frequently an NP-hard or even PSPACE-hard computational challenge. In this study, we tackle the even more challenging goal of jointly optimizing task and motion plans for a real dual-arm system in which the two arms operate in close vicinity to solve highly constrained tabletop multi-object rearrangement problems. Toward that, we construct a tightly integrated planning and control optimization pipeline, Makespan-Optimized Dual-Arm Planner (MODAP) that combines novel sampling techniques for task planning with state-of-the-art trajectory optimization techniques. Compared to previous state-of-the-art, MODAP produces task and motion plans that better coordinate a dual-arm system, delivering significantly improved execution time improvements while simultaneously ensuring that the resulting time-parameterized trajectory conforms to specified acceleration and jerk limits.

Read more

4/11/2024

Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Real

Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Real

Tianyang Pan, Rahul Shome, Lydia E. Kavraki

YC

0

Reddit

0

Task and motion planning represents a powerful set of hybrid planning methods that combine reasoning over discrete task domains and continuous motion generation. Traditional reasoning necessitates task domain models and enough information to ground actions to motion planning queries. Gaps in this knowledge often arise from sources like occlusion or imprecise modeling. This work generates task and motion plans that include actions cannot be fully grounded at planning time. During execution, such an action is handled by a provided human-designed or learned closed-loop behavior. Execution combines offline planned motions and online behaviors till reaching the task goal. Failures of behaviors are fed back as constraints to find new plans. Forty real-robot trials and motivating demonstrations are performed to evaluate the proposed framework and compare against state-of-the-art. Results show faster execution time, less number of actions, and more success in problems where diverse gaps arise. The experiment data is shared for researchers to simulate these settings. The work shows promise in expanding the applicable class of realistic partially grounded problems that robots can address.

Read more

6/14/2024