Code-mixed Sentiment and Hate-speech Prediction

Overview

• Code-mixing, the combination of multiple languages in a single text, is common in informal communication in multilingual societies.
• As large language models have become dominant in natural language processing, the researchers investigated their performance on code-mixed data for tasks like sentiment analysis and offensive language detection.
• The researchers created new bilingual pre-trained language models for English-Hindi and English-Slovene, then evaluated monolingual, bilingual, and multilingual models on code-mixed and non-code-mixed data.

Plain English Explanation

In many parts of the world, people often mix two or more languages when they communicate informally. This is called "code-mixing." For example, someone might write a social media post that includes both English and Hindi words. As recently large language models have dominated most natural language processing tasks, the researchers wanted to see how well these models perform on text that contains this kind of code-mixing.

First, the researchers created new language models that were trained on a mix of English and Hindi, as well as English and Slovene. These models were designed to handle informal, code-mixed language better than more general-purpose models.

Then, the researchers tested different types of language models - monolingual (single-language), bilingual (two-language), and multilingual (many-language) - on two tasks: sentiment analysis (determining if a piece of text expresses positive or negative feelings) and detecting offensive language in social media posts. They compared the models' performance on code-mixed data versus non-code-mixed data.

The results showed that the bilingual and multilingual models, especially those designed for social media text, performed the best on the code-mixed data. The very large, general-purpose language models did not do as well. Interestingly, the models often performed slightly better on the code-mixed data compared to the non-code-mixed data for these affective tasks.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first created four new bilingual pre-trained masked language models for the English-Hindi and English-Slovene language pairs, with the goal of better supporting informal, code-mixed language.

They then evaluated the performance of monolingual, bilingual, few-lingual, and massively multilingual models on two tasks that frequently involve code-mixed text: sentiment analysis and offensive language detection in social media posts. The models included fine-tuned bilingual models, fine-tuned multilingual models specialized for social media, as well as non-specialized massively multilingual and monolingual models.

The results showed that the most successful classifiers were the fine-tuned bilingual and multilingual models specialized for social media texts. These outperformed the non-specialized massively multilingual and monolingual models. The huge generative language models were not competitive for these affective tasks.

Interestingly, the models generally performed slightly better on code-mixed data compared to non-code-mixed data for the sentiment analysis and offensive language detection tasks. This suggests that the models were able to effectively handle the code-mixing and leverage the additional linguistic information present in the mixed-language text.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge some limitations of their work. They only evaluated the models on two specific tasks - sentiment analysis and offensive language detection. The performance of these models may differ for other NLP tasks that involve code-mixed data.

Additionally, the study was limited to the English-Hindi and English-Slovene language pairs. Code-mixing can occur in many other language combinations, and the findings may not generalize to those cases.

While the researchers created new bilingual pre-trained models, it's unclear if these models were truly optimized for informal, code-mixed language, or if further dataset curation and model architecture innovations would be needed to fully unlock the potential of language models for this domain.

Furthermore, the use of synthetic data generation techniques to augment the training data was not explored in this work, which could potentially improve the models' ability to handle code-mixing.

Overall, this research provides a useful benchmark for the current state of language models on code-mixed data, but there is still room for improvement and further exploration in this area.

Conclusion

This study investigated the performance of various language models, including monolingual, bilingual, and multilingual models, on code-mixed text for sentiment analysis and offensive language detection tasks. The key finding is that fine-tuned bilingual and multilingual models specialized for social media performed the best on these code-mixed datasets, outperforming even massive generalist language models.

These results suggest that tailored models that can effectively handle the linguistic complexities of code-mixing are needed to unlock the full potential of natural language processing in multilingual societies. Further research is needed to extend these findings to other language pairs and NLP tasks, as well as to explore additional modeling techniques to improve performance on code-mixed data.