Codecfake: An Initial Dataset for Detecting LLM-based Deepfake Audio

Read original: arXiv:2406.08112 - Published 6/13/2024 by Yi Lu, Yuankun Xie, Ruibo Fu, Zhengqi Wen, Jianhua Tao, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Qi, Xuefei Liu, Yongwei Li, Yukun Liu and 2 others
Total Score

0

Codecfake: An Initial Dataset for Detecting LLM-based Deepfake Audio

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new dataset called Codecfake for detecting deepfake audio created using large language models (LLMs).
  • Codecfake contains speech samples with varying degrees of manipulation, including LLM-generated audio, AI-assisted audio, and real human speech.
  • The dataset is intended to help develop more effective countermeasures against deepfake audio by providing a standardized benchmark for evaluating detection models.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have created a new dataset called Codecfake that can be used to train and test AI models for detecting fake audio generated using large language models (LLMs). Deepfake audio is a type of synthetic speech that can be very difficult to distinguish from real human speech.

The Codecfake dataset contains three main types of audio samples:

  1. LLM-generated audio: Speech generated entirely by an LLM, with no human involvement.
  2. AI-assisted audio: Speech where an LLM was used to assist a human speaker, for example by suggesting word choices or sentence structures.
  3. Genuine human speech: Unaltered recordings of real people speaking.

By including all these different types of audio, the dataset allows researchers to develop detection models that can reliably distinguish between authentic and AI-generated or AI-assisted speech. This is an important task, as deepfake audio can be used to create misinformation and impersonate real people, with potentially harmful consequences.

The researchers hope that the Codecfake dataset will serve as a standardized benchmark to evaluate and improve the performance of deepfake audio detection models, ultimately helping to build more robust safeguards against this emerging threat.

Technical Explanation

The Codecfake dataset was created by the researchers to address the growing challenge of detecting deepfake audio generated using large language models (LLMs). The dataset contains three main categories of audio samples:

  1. LLM-generated audio: These are speech samples generated entirely by an LLM, with no human involvement in the creation process.
  2. AI-assisted audio: These samples involve a human speaker whose speech was assisted by an LLM, for example by suggesting word choices or sentence structures.
  3. Genuine human speech: These are unaltered recordings of real people speaking.

By including these diverse sample types, the researchers aim to create a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the performance of deepfake audio detection models. The dataset can be used to train and test detection algorithms that can reliably distinguish between authentic and AI-generated or AI-assisted speech.

The researchers describe their process for collecting and annotating the audio samples, as well as their plans for making the Codecfake dataset publicly available to the research community. They also discuss the potential applications of this dataset, such as developing more robust anti-spoofing models and improving the overall reliability of deepfake audio detection systems.

Critical Analysis

The Codecfake dataset represents an important contribution to the field of deepfake audio detection, as it provides a standardized benchmark for evaluating the performance of detection models. The inclusion of AI-assisted audio samples is particularly notable, as this type of hybrid speech can be especially challenging to detect.

However, the paper does acknowledge several limitations of the dataset. For example, the audio samples are all in English, which may limit the generalizability of the detection models to other languages. Additionally, the dataset does not currently include examples of audio manipulation techniques that may emerge in the future, such as voice conversion or voice cloning.

Further research is needed to address these limitations and expand the Codecfake dataset to better reflect the evolving landscape of deepfake audio threats. Additionally, it will be important to continuously update the dataset as new detection techniques and audio manipulation methods are developed.

Conclusion

The Codecfake dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers and developers working on deepfake audio detection. By offering a standardized benchmark for evaluating detection models, the dataset can help drive the development of more robust and effective countermeasures against this emerging threat to digital authenticity. While the dataset has some limitations, the researchers' efforts represent an important step forward in the ongoing battle against the proliferation of synthetic media.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Codecfake: An Initial Dataset for Detecting LLM-based Deepfake Audio
Total Score

0

Codecfake: An Initial Dataset for Detecting LLM-based Deepfake Audio

Yi Lu, Yuankun Xie, Ruibo Fu, Zhengqi Wen, Jianhua Tao, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Qi, Xuefei Liu, Yongwei Li, Yukun Liu, Xiaopeng Wang, Shuchen Shi

With the proliferation of Large Language Model (LLM) based deepfake audio, there is an urgent need for effective detection methods. Previous deepfake audio generation methods typically involve a multi-step generation process, with the final step using a vocoder to predict the waveform from handcrafted features. However, LLM-based audio is directly generated from discrete neural codecs in an end-to-end generation process, skipping the final step of vocoder processing. This poses a significant challenge for current audio deepfake detection (ADD) models based on vocoder artifacts. To effectively detect LLM-based deepfake audio, we focus on the core of the generation process, the conversion from neural codec to waveform. We propose Codecfake dataset, which is generated by seven representative neural codec methods. Experiment results show that codec-trained ADD models exhibit a 41.406% reduction in average equal error rate compared to vocoder-trained ADD models on the Codecfake test set.

Read more

6/13/2024

šŸ”Ž

Total Score

0

The Codecfake Dataset and Countermeasures for the Universally Detection of Deepfake Audio

Yuankun Xie, Yi Lu, Ruibo Fu, Zhengqi Wen, Zhiyong Wang, Jianhua Tao, Xin Qi, Xiaopeng Wang, Yukun Liu, Haonan Cheng, Long Ye, Yi Sun

With the proliferation of Audio Language Model (ALM) based deepfake audio, there is an urgent need for generalized detection methods. ALM-based deepfake audio currently exhibits widespread, high deception, and type versatility, posing a significant challenge to current audio deepfake detection (ADD) models trained solely on vocoded data. To effectively detect ALM-based deepfake audio, we focus on the mechanism of the ALM-based audio generation method, the conversion from neural codec to waveform. We initially construct the Codecfake dataset, an open-source large-scale dataset, including 2 languages, over 1M audio samples, and various test conditions, focus on ALM-based audio detection. As countermeasure, to achieve universal detection of deepfake audio and tackle domain ascent bias issue of original SAM, we propose the CSAM strategy to learn a domain balanced and generalized minima. In our experiments, we first demonstrate that ADD model training with the Codecfake dataset can effectively detects ALM-based audio. Furthermore, our proposed generalization countermeasure yields the lowest average Equal Error Rate (EER) of 0.616% across all test conditions compared to baseline models. The dataset and associated code are available online.

Read more

5/16/2024

CodecFake: Enhancing Anti-Spoofing Models Against Deepfake Audios from Codec-Based Speech Synthesis Systems
Total Score

0

CodecFake: Enhancing Anti-Spoofing Models Against Deepfake Audios from Codec-Based Speech Synthesis Systems

Haibin Wu, Yuan Tseng, Hung-yi Lee

Current state-of-the-art (SOTA) codec-based audio synthesis systems can mimic anyone's voice with just a 3-second sample from that specific unseen speaker. Unfortunately, malicious attackers may exploit these technologies, causing misuse and security issues. Anti-spoofing models have been developed to detect fake speech. However, the open question of whether current SOTA anti-spoofing models can effectively counter deepfake audios from codec-based speech synthesis systems remains unanswered. In this paper, we curate an extensive collection of contemporary SOTA codec models, employing them to re-create synthesized speech. This endeavor leads to the creation of CodecFake, the first codec-based deepfake audio dataset. Additionally, we verify that anti-spoofing models trained on commonly used datasets cannot detect synthesized speech from current codec-based speech generation systems. The proposed CodecFake dataset empowers these models to counter this challenge effectively.

Read more

6/12/2024

Cross-Domain Audio Deepfake Detection: Dataset and Analysis
Total Score

0

Cross-Domain Audio Deepfake Detection: Dataset and Analysis

Yuang Li, Min Zhang, Mengxin Ren, Miaomiao Ma, Daimeng Wei, Hao Yang

Audio deepfake detection (ADD) is essential for preventing the misuse of synthetic voices that may infringe on personal rights and privacy. Recent zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) models pose higher risks as they can clone voices with a single utterance. However, the existing ADD datasets are outdated, leading to suboptimal generalization of detection models. In this paper, we construct a new cross-domain ADD dataset comprising over 300 hours of speech data that is generated by five advanced zero-shot TTS models. To simulate real-world scenarios, we employ diverse attack methods and audio prompts from different datasets. Experiments show that, through novel attack-augmented training, the Wav2Vec2-large and Whisper-medium models achieve equal error rates of 4.1% and 6.5% respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate our models' outstanding few-shot ADD ability by fine-tuning with just one minute of target-domain data. Nonetheless, neural codec compressors greatly affect the detection accuracy, necessitating further research.

Read more

4/9/2024