COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for Large Language Model benchmarks in the medical domain
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for benchmarking large language models (LLMs) in the medical domain.
- The goal is to provide a comprehensive and standardized way to assess the performance of LLMs on a variety of medical-related tasks.
- The COGNET-MD dataset covers a range of topics, including clinical diagnosis, treatment recommendations, and medical question answering.
Plain English Explanation
COGNET-MD is a new tool that allows researchers to thoroughly test how well large language models perform on medical-related tasks. Large language models are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models have made impressive progress in recent years, but their performance in the specialized domain of healthcare has not been well-studied.
The COGNET-MD framework provides a standardized way to evaluate these models on a variety of medical tasks, such as diagnosing patient conditions, recommending treatments, and answering healthcare-related questions. This will help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of large language models when it comes to real-world medical applications.
The COGNET-MD dataset covers a wide range of medical topics and scenarios, making it a comprehensive benchmark for assessing these AI systems. By using a common set of tasks and data, researchers can more fairly compare the performance of different large language models in the medical domain.
Technical Explanation
The COGNET-MD framework and dataset introduced in this paper are designed to provide a standardized way to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) on a variety of medical-related tasks. This builds on previous work in benchmarking LLMs for healthcare applications, such as MedExpQA, a comprehensive medical benchmark for Chinese, and a broad benchmark for LLMs in healthcare.
The COGNET-MD dataset covers a range of medical tasks, including clinical diagnosis, treatment recommendations, and medical question answering. These tasks are designed to assess the ability of LLMs to understand and reason about medical concepts, as well as generate relevant and accurate responses.
The paper describes the process of constructing the COGNET-MD dataset, including data collection, annotation, and quality control. The authors also discuss the evaluation metrics used to assess model performance, such as accuracy, F1 score, and perplexity.
Critical Analysis
The COGNET-MD framework represents a significant advancement in evaluating the medical capabilities of large language models. By providing a standardized and comprehensive benchmark, it will enable more rigorous and meaningful comparisons between different LLM architectures and training approaches.
However, the paper acknowledges some limitations of the current version of COGNET-MD. For example, the dataset is primarily in English, and the authors suggest expanding it to other languages to better reflect the global nature of healthcare. Additionally, the tasks may not capture all the nuances and complexities of real-world medical decision-making, and further refinement of the benchmark may be necessary.
It will also be important to continuously update and expand the COGNET-MD dataset as large language models and medical knowledge continue to evolve. Ongoing maintenance and curation will be critical to ensuring the benchmark remains relevant and useful for the research community.
Conclusion
The COGNET-MD framework and dataset introduced in this paper represent a significant step forward in evaluating the performance of large language models in the medical domain. By providing a standardized and comprehensive benchmark, the authors aim to enable more meaningful comparisons between different LLM approaches and drive advancements in the field of medical AI.
As large language models become increasingly prominent in healthcare applications, tools like COGNET-MD will be essential for ensuring these systems are accurate, reliable, and aligned with the needs of medical professionals and patients. The continued development and refinement of this benchmark will be crucial for realizing the full potential of LLMs in the medical field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for Large Language Model benchmarks in the medical domain
Dimitrios P. Panagoulias, Persephone Papatheodosiou, Anastasios P. Palamidas, Mattheos Sanoudos, Evridiki Tsoureli-Nikita, Maria Virvou, George A. Tsihrintzis
Large Language Models (LLMs) constitute a breakthrough state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology which is rapidly evolving and promises to aid in medical diagnosis either by assisting doctors or by simulating a doctor's workflow in more advanced and complex implementations. In this technical paper, we outline Cognitive Network Evaluation Toolkit for Medical Domains (COGNET-MD), which constitutes a novel benchmark for LLM evaluation in the medical domain. Specifically, we propose a scoring-framework with increased difficulty to assess the ability of LLMs in interpreting medical text. The proposed framework is accompanied with a database of Multiple Choice Quizzes (MCQs). To ensure alignment with current medical trends and enhance safety, usefulness, and applicability, these MCQs have been constructed in collaboration with several associated medical experts in various medical domains and are characterized by varying degrees of difficulty. The current (first) version of the database includes the medical domains of Psychiatry, Dentistry, Pulmonology, Dermatology and Endocrinology, but it will be continuously extended and expanded to include additional medical domains.
Read more5/20/2024
0
A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
Jinqiang Wang, Huansheng Ning, Yi Peng, Qikai Wei, Daniel Tesfai, Wenwei Mao, Tao Zhu, Runhe Huang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated surprising performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, medical LLMs enhanced with domain-specific knowledge have exhibited excellent capabilities in medical consultation and diagnosis. These models can smoothly simulate doctor-patient dialogues and provide professional medical advice. Most medical LLMs are developed through continued training of open-source general LLMs, which require significantly fewer computational resources than training LLMs from scratch. Additionally, this approach offers better patient privacy protection than API-based solutions. Given the above advantages, this survey systematically summarizes how to train medical LLMs based on open-source general LLMs from a more fine-grained perspective. It covers (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose an appropriate training paradigm, (c) how to choose a suitable evaluation benchmark, and (d) existing challenges and promising research directions are discussed. This survey can provide guidance for the development of LLMs focused on various medical applications, such as medical education, diagnostic planning, and clinical assistants. Related resources and supplemental information can be found on the GitHub repository.
Read more9/24/2024
🤿
0
MEDIC: Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Clinical Applications
Praveen K Kanithi, Cl'ement Christophe, Marco AF Pimentel, Tathagata Raha, Nada Saadi, Hamza Javed, Svetlana Maslenkova, Nasir Hayat, Ronnie Rajan, Shadab Khan
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) for healthcare applications has spurred calls for holistic evaluation beyond frequently-cited benchmarks like USMLE, to better reflect real-world performance. While real-world assessments are valuable indicators of utility, they often lag behind the pace of LLM evolution, likely rendering findings obsolete upon deployment. This temporal disconnect necessitates a comprehensive upfront evaluation that can guide model selection for specific clinical applications. We introduce MEDIC, a framework assessing LLMs across five critical dimensions of clinical competence: medical reasoning, ethics and bias, data and language understanding, in-context learning, and clinical safety. MEDIC features a novel cross-examination framework quantifying LLM performance across areas like coverage and hallucination detection, without requiring reference outputs. We apply MEDIC to evaluate LLMs on medical question-answering, safety, summarization, note generation, and other tasks. Our results show performance disparities across model sizes, baseline vs medically finetuned models, and have implications on model selection for applications requiring specific model strengths, such as low hallucination or lower cost of inference. MEDIC's multifaceted evaluation reveals these performance trade-offs, bridging the gap between theoretical capabilities and practical implementation in healthcare settings, ensuring that the most promising models are identified and adapted for diverse healthcare applications.
Read more9/12/2024
💬
0
Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey
Xiaolan Chen, Jiayang Xiang, Shanfu Lu, Yexin Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with transformative potential across numerous domains, including healthcare and medicine. In the medical domain, LLMs hold promise for tasks ranging from clinical decision support to patient education. However, evaluating the performance of LLMs in medical contexts presents unique challenges due to the complex and critical nature of medical information. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of medical LLM evaluation, synthesizing insights from existing studies and highlighting evaluation data sources, task scenarios, and evaluation methods. Additionally, it identifies key challenges and opportunities in medical LLM evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to ensure the responsible integration of LLMs into clinical practice.
Read more5/14/2024