CoGS: Causality Constrained Counterfactual Explanations using goal-directed ASP

Overview

• This paper presents CoGS, a new approach for generating causality-constrained counterfactual explanations for black-box machine learning models.

• CoGS uses goal-directed Answer Set Programming (ASP) to generate counterfactual explanations that satisfy causal constraints, making them more plausible and actionable.

• The research is supported by US NSF Grants IIS 1910131, US DoD, and industry grants.

Plain English Explanation

Counterfactual explanations are a way to understand how machine learning models make predictions. They show what changes would need to be made to the input for the model to predict a different outcome. For example, a counterfactual explanation for a loan denial might show that if the applicant's income was $5,000 higher, they would have been approved.

However, existing counterfactual explanation methods can produce explanations that are not realistic or actionable, because they don't take into account the causal relationships between the input features. The CoGS method addresses this by using a technique called goal-directed Answer Set Programming (ASP) to generate counterfactual explanations that satisfy causal constraints.

This means the explanations generated by CoGS are more plausible and actionable, because they respect the underlying causal structure of the problem. For example, the counterfactual explanation for the loan denial might show that if the applicant's education level was higher, their income would also be higher, and they would then be approved for the loan.

By incorporating causal reasoning, CoGS can produce counterfactual explanations that are more useful for users to understand and act upon the model's decisions.

Technical Explanation

The CoGS method builds on previous work on plausible counterfactual explanations and counterfactual explanations for black-box models.

CoGS uses goal-directed Answer Set Programming (ASP) to generate counterfactual explanations that satisfy causal constraints. ASP is a declarative programming paradigm that allows the researchers to specify the causal relationships between input features as logical rules.

The CoGS framework first learns a causal representation of the problem domain. It then uses this causal model along with the target machine learning model to generate counterfactual explanations that respect the causal constraints.

The key insight is that by incorporating causal reasoning, CoGS can produce counterfactual explanations that are more plausible and actionable, because they reflect the underlying causal structure of the problem. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of CoGS through experiments on several real-world datasets.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations of the CoGS approach. First, the method relies on having accurate causal models, which may be difficult to obtain in practice. Second, the computational complexity of the goal-directed ASP reasoning can be high, especially for large or complex models.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or fairness issues that may arise when using causal reasoning to generate counterfactual explanations. There may be cases where the causal model itself reflects societal biases, which could then be amplified in the counterfactual explanations.

Further research is needed to address these limitations and explore the broader implications of incorporating causal reasoning into counterfactual explanations. Nonetheless, the CoGS approach represents an important step forward in making counterfactual explanations more plausible and actionable for users.

Conclusion

The CoGS method presented in this paper offers a novel approach to generating counterfactual explanations for black-box machine learning models. By incorporating causal reasoning using goal-directed ASP, CoGS can produce counterfactual explanations that are more plausible and actionable than previous methods.

This work has important implications for improving the interpretability and transparency of complex machine learning models, which is crucial for building trust and accountability. The causal-aware counterfactual explanations generated by CoGS can help users better understand and act upon the decisions made by these models.

While the method has some limitations, the overall contribution of this research is significant and represents an important advancement in the field of explainable AI.