Collaborative Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Multi-Armed Bandits
0
🏅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study explores a new collaborative setting for multi-agent bandits, where each agent is learning one of several stochastic multi-armed bandits to minimize the group's cumulative regret.
- The researchers develop decentralized algorithms to facilitate collaboration between the agents in two different scenarios.
- They analyze the performance of these algorithms by deriving upper bounds for the per-agent cumulative regret and group regret.
- The researchers also prove lower bounds for the group regret, demonstrating the near-optimal behavior of the proposed algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
In this study, the researchers looked at a new way for multiple agents to work together on a type of machine learning problem called a "multi-armed bandit." In a multi-armed bandit problem, an agent has to choose from several different options (the "arms" of the bandit) and try to maximize their rewards over time.
In the collaborative setting the researchers studied, there are N agents, and each agent is responsible for learning one of M different multi-armed bandit problems. The goal for the group is to minimize the total regret, which measures how much worse their collective performance is compared to the optimal strategy.
The researchers developed decentralized algorithms, which means the agents can collaborate without a central coordinator. They analyzed how well these algorithms perform, looking at the regret for each individual agent as well as the overall group regret.
Importantly, the researchers also proved lower bounds for the group regret, which shows that the algorithms they proposed are nearly as good as possible. This suggests their approach is a promising way for multiple agents to work together on multi-armed bandit problems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers studied a new collaborative multi-agent bandit setting where N agents each learn one of M different stochastic multi-armed bandits with the goal of minimizing the group's cumulative regret.
They developed decentralized algorithms to facilitate collaboration between the agents. In the first scenario, the agents can share information about their individual bandit problems. In the second scenario, the agents can also coordinate their actions across the different bandits.
The researchers analyzed the performance of these algorithms by deriving upper bounds for the per-agent cumulative regret and the group regret. They also proved lower bounds for the group regret, which demonstrates the near-optimal behavior of the proposed algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important contributions to the study of collaborative multi-agent bandits. By considering a new setting where each agent is responsible for a different bandit problem, the researchers have expanded the scope of this research area.
The decentralized algorithms they developed are particularly noteworthy, as they allow for collaboration without requiring a central coordinator. This could be valuable in real-world applications where a centralized approach may not be feasible.
That said, the paper does not address potential issues that could arise in practical implementations, such as network interference between agents or the impact of heterogeneous action spaces across the different bandits. Further research would be needed to understand how these factors might affect the performance of the proposed algorithms.
Additionally, the analysis focuses on regret as the primary metric of interest. While regret is a common performance measure in bandit problems, other metrics like fairness or equity across agents may also be important in collaborative settings.
Conclusion
This study introduces a new collaborative multi-agent bandit setting and proposes decentralized algorithms to address it. The researchers' analysis demonstrates the near-optimal performance of their algorithms, suggesting that this approach could be a valuable tool for tackling real-world problems that involve multiple agents working together on related but distinct decision-making tasks.
While further research is needed to address potential practical challenges, this work represents an important step forward in the study of collaborative multi-agent bandits and its applications in fields like robotics, finance, and network optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
0
Collaborative Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Multi-Armed Bandits
Ronshee Chawla, Daniel Vial, Sanjay Shakkottai, R. Srikant
The study of collaborative multi-agent bandits has attracted significant attention recently. In light of this, we initiate the study of a new collaborative setting, consisting of $N$ agents such that each agent is learning one of $M$ stochastic multi-armed bandits to minimize their group cumulative regret. We develop decentralized algorithms which facilitate collaboration between the agents under two scenarios. We characterize the performance of these algorithms by deriving the per agent cumulative regret and group regret upper bounds. We also prove lower bounds for the group regret in this setting, which demonstrates the near-optimal behavior of the proposed algorithms.
Read more7/4/2024
🔍
0
The Gossiping Insert-Eliminate Algorithm for Multi-Agent Bandits
Ronshee Chawla, Abishek Sankararaman, Ayalvadi Ganesh, Sanjay Shakkottai
We consider a decentralized multi-agent Multi Armed Bandit (MAB) setup consisting of $N$ agents, solving the same MAB instance to minimize individual cumulative regret. In our model, agents collaborate by exchanging messages through pairwise gossip style communications on an arbitrary connected graph. We develop two novel algorithms, where each agent only plays from a subset of all the arms. Agents use the communication medium to recommend only arm-IDs (not samples), and thus update the set of arms from which they play. We establish that, if agents communicate $Omega(log(T))$ times through any connected pairwise gossip mechanism, then every agent's regret is a factor of order $N$ smaller compared to the case of no collaborations. Furthermore, we show that the communication constraints only have a second order effect on the regret of our algorithm. We then analyze this second order term of the regret to derive bounds on the regret-communication tradeoffs. Finally, we empirically evaluate our algorithm and conclude that the insights are fundamental and not artifacts of our bounds. We also show a lower bound which gives that the regret scaling obtained by our algorithm cannot be improved even in the absence of any communication constraints. Our results thus demonstrate that even a minimal level of collaboration among agents greatly reduces regret for all agents.
Read more7/4/2024
🌿
0
Imprecise Multi-Armed Bandits
Vanessa Kosoy
We introduce a novel multi-armed bandit framework, where each arm is associated with a fixed unknown credal set over the space of outcomes (which can be richer than just the reward). The arm-to-credal-set correspondence comes from a known class of hypotheses. We then define a notion of regret corresponding to the lower prevision defined by these credal sets. Equivalently, the setting can be regarded as a two-player zero-sum game, where, on each round, the agent chooses an arm and the adversary chooses the distribution over outcomes from a set of options associated with this arm. The regret is defined with respect to the value of game. For certain natural hypothesis classes, loosely analgous to stochastic linear bandits (which are a special case of the resulting setting), we propose an algorithm and prove a corresponding upper bound on regret. We also prove lower bounds on regret for particular special cases.
Read more5/10/2024
🤯
0
Federated Combinatorial Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits
Fares Fourati, Mohamed-Slim Alouini, Vaneet Aggarwal
This paper introduces a federated learning framework tailored for online combinatorial optimization with bandit feedback. In this setting, agents select subsets of arms, observe noisy rewards for these subsets without accessing individual arm information, and can cooperate and share information at specific intervals. Our framework transforms any offline resilient single-agent $(alpha-epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, having a complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{psi}{epsilon^beta})$, where the logarithm is omitted, for some function $psi$ and constant $beta$, into an online multi-agent algorithm with $m$ communicating agents and an $alpha$-regret of no more than $tilde{mathcal{O}}(m^{-frac{1}{3+beta}} psi^frac{1}{3+beta} T^frac{2+beta}{3+beta})$. This approach not only eliminates the $epsilon$ approximation error but also ensures sublinear growth with respect to the time horizon $T$ and demonstrates a linear speedup with an increasing number of communicating agents. Additionally, the algorithm is notably communication-efficient, requiring only a sublinear number of communication rounds, quantified as $tilde{mathcal{O}}left(psi T^frac{beta}{beta+1}right)$. Furthermore, the framework has been successfully applied to online stochastic submodular maximization using various offline algorithms, yielding the first results for both single-agent and multi-agent settings and recovering specialized single-agent theoretical guarantees. We empirically validate our approach to a stochastic data summarization problem, illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed framework, even in single-agent scenarios.
Read more5/10/2024