Imprecise Multi-Armed Bandits

Overview

• Introduces a novel multi-armed bandit framework
• Each arm is associated with a fixed unknown credal set over the space of outcomes
• The arm-to-credal-set correspondence comes from a known class of hypotheses
• Defines a notion of regret corresponding to the lower prevision defined by these credal sets
• Equivalent to a two-player zero-sum game where the agent chooses an arm and the adversary chooses the distribution over outcomes
• Proposes an algorithm and proves an upper bound on regret for certain natural hypothesis classes, loosely analogous to stochastic linear bandits
• Also proves lower bounds on regret for particular special cases

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new type of multi-armed bandit problem, where each "arm" (or option) is associated with a set of possible outcomes, rather than just a single reward value. This set of outcomes is represented by a "credal set" - a mathematical way of describing uncertainty about the probabilities of different outcomes.

The key idea is that the agent (the person or algorithm making decisions) doesn't know the exact probabilities of the outcomes for each arm. Instead, they only know that the probabilities fall within a certain set or range. The agent's goal is to minimize their "regret" - how much they lose compared to the best possible choice, given this uncertain information.

The authors show that this setting is equivalent to a two-player game, where the agent chooses an arm and the "adversary" (the environment or another player) chooses the exact probability distribution of outcomes from the set associated with that arm. The regret is defined in terms of the value of this game.

For certain types of problems, similar to stochastic linear bandits, the authors propose an algorithm and prove that it can achieve a good upper bound on the regret. They also prove lower bounds on the regret for some special cases.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel multi-armed bandit framework where each arm is associated with a fixed, unknown credal set over the space of outcomes. This means that instead of each arm having a single, known reward value, it has a set of possible outcome distributions that the agent doesn't know exactly.

The arm-to-credal-set correspondence comes from a known class of hypotheses. This allows the authors to define a notion of regret corresponding to the lower prevision (a type of uncertainty measure) defined by these credal sets.

Equivalently, the setting can be regarded as a two-player zero-sum game, where the agent chooses an arm and the adversary chooses the distribution over outcomes from the set associated with that arm. The regret is defined with respect to the value of this game.

For certain natural hypothesis classes, loosely analogous to stochastic linear bandits (a special case of this setting), the authors propose an algorithm and prove a corresponding upper bound on regret.

They also prove lower bounds on regret for particular special cases, such as rotting infinitely many-armed bandits and federated combinatorial multi-agent multi-armed bandits.

Critical Analysis

The paper introduces an interesting generalization of the multi-armed bandit problem, which allows for more nuanced modeling of uncertainty around outcomes. This could be particularly useful in real-world applications where the exact probabilities of different outcomes are not known with certainty.

However, the proposed framework and algorithms may be more complex to implement and analyze than standard multi-armed bandit approaches. The authors acknowledge that the regret bounds they prove are not as tight as those for simpler bandit problems, and the computational complexity of their algorithms is also higher.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not provide any empirical evaluation of the proposed methods. It would be helpful to see how they perform in practice, especially compared to other multi-armed bandit approaches, to better assess their strengths and limitations.

Further research could explore ways to improve the regret bounds and computational efficiency of the algorithms, as well as investigate applications of this framework to real-world problems, such as locally private linear contextual bandits or diversity-preserving k-armed bandits.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel multi-armed bandit framework that allows for more expressive modeling of uncertainty around outcomes. By associating each arm with a credal set of possible distributions, rather than a single reward value, the authors define a notion of regret that captures the agent's lack of complete information.

While the proposed algorithms and analysis are theoretically interesting, the increased complexity compared to standard multi-armed bandit approaches may limit their practical applicability. Further research is needed to improve the regret bounds and computational efficiency, as well as to explore real-world use cases for this framework.

Overall, this work represents an important step in expanding the multi-armed bandit paradigm to handle more nuanced forms of uncertainty, which could have significant implications for decision-making in a wide range of applications.