Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions
0
🌐
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores combinatorial auctions without a numeraire, focusing on the case of blockchain trade-intent auctions.
- Combinatorial auctions allow bidders to bid on bundles of items, rather than individual items, which can lead to more efficient allocations.
- The authors propose a novel auction mechanism for blockchain-based trade-intent auctions, where bidders express their intent to trade rather than submitting bids.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a type of auction called a "combinatorial auction" that is used in blockchain-based trade-intent auctions. In a combinatorial auction, bidders can bid on bundles of items rather than just individual items. This can lead to more efficient outcomes because bidders can express their preferences for combinations of items.
The key innovation in this paper is a new auction mechanism for blockchain-based trade-intent auctions. In these auctions, bidders don't submit traditional bids, but rather express their intent to trade certain items. The auction mechanism then determines the optimal allocation of items based on these trade intentions.
This approach is useful in blockchain-based marketplaces where there may not be a clear "numeraire" or unit of value that all items can be priced against. By focusing on trade intentions rather than monetary bids, the auction can still find efficient allocations of items without a common unit of value.
The authors explain how this auction mechanism works and provide theoretical analysis to show that it has desirable properties like [link to "Pareto optimality"]. Overall, the paper presents a novel way to run combinatorial auctions in blockchain settings where traditional auction approaches may not apply.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new auction mechanism for combinatorial auctions in blockchain trade-intent settings. In a traditional combinatorial auction, bidders submit bids for bundles of items, and the auctioneer determines the allocation that maximizes the total value of the winning bids.
However, in a blockchain trade-intent auction, there may not be a clear numeraire or common unit of value that all items can be priced against. To address this, the authors introduce a novel auction mechanism where bidders express their intent to trade certain bundles of items, rather than submitting monetary bids.
The auction mechanism works as follows:
- Bidders submit their trade intentions, specifying the bundles of items they are willing to trade and the relative values they assign to those bundles.
- The auctioneer then solves an optimization problem to determine the allocation of items that maximizes the total "trade value" expressed by the bidders.
- The auction outcome is a set of paired trades, where each trade involves the exchange of one bundle of items for another.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of this auction mechanism, showing that it satisfies desirable properties such as [link to "Pareto optimality"] and [link to "individual rationality"]. They also discuss how the mechanism can be implemented on a blockchain platform to enable secure, transparent, and tamper-resistant trade-intent auctions.
Critical Analysis
The authors have identified an important problem in the context of blockchain-based marketplaces, where the lack of a common numeraire can make traditional auction mechanisms less applicable. Their proposed trade-intent auction mechanism is a novel and interesting solution to this challenge.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on bidders accurately representing their preferences and trade intentions. In practice, bidders may have incentives to misrepresent their intentions, which could lead to suboptimal allocations. The authors acknowledge this issue and discuss potential ways to address it, such as incorporating reputation-based incentives.
Another area for further research could be the practical implementation and scalability of the proposed mechanism on real-world blockchain platforms. The authors provide a high-level description of the approach, but more work may be needed to address technical challenges related to transaction processing, consensus, and user experience.
Overall, this paper presents a valuable contribution to the literature on combinatorial auctions and blockchain-based market design. The trade-intent auction mechanism offers a promising approach for enabling efficient resource allocation in blockchain-based ecosystems without a clear numeraire. Further research and real-world experimentation could help refine and validate the practical applicability of this method.
Conclusion
This paper explores a novel auction mechanism for combinatorial auctions in blockchain trade-intent settings, where there is no clear numeraire or common unit of value. The authors propose a trade-intent auction approach where bidders express their willingness to exchange bundles of items, rather than submitting monetary bids.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of this mechanism, showing that it satisfies desirable properties like Pareto optimality and individual rationality. They also discuss potential implementation challenges and avenues for future research.
The trade-intent auction mechanism presented in this paper offers a promising approach for enabling efficient resource allocation in blockchain-based marketplaces and ecosystems. By focusing on trade intentions rather than monetary bids, the auction can find optimal allocations without the need for a common numeraire. This innovation could have significant implications for the design and development of decentralized, blockchain-powered economies and trading platforms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
0
Combinatorial Auctions without a Numeraire: The Case of Blockchain Trade-Intent Auctions
Andrea Canidio, Felix Henneke
Blockchain trade intent auctions currently intermediate approximately USD 5 billion monthly. Due to production complementarities, the auction is combinatorial: when multiple trade intents from different traders are auctioned off simultaneously, a bidder (here called solver) can generate additional efficiencies by winning a batch of multiple trade intents. However, unlike other combinatorial auctions studied in the literature, the auction has no numeraire. Fairness is a concern as the efficiencies from batching cannot be easily shared between traders. We formalize this problem and study the most commonly used auction formats: batch auctions and multiple simultaneous auctions. We also propose a novel fair combinatorial auction that combines batch auction and multiple simultaneous auctions: solvers submit individual-trade bids and batched bids, but batched bids are considered only if they are better for all traders relative to the outcome of multiple simultaneous auctions (constructed using the individual-trade bids). We find a trade-off between the fairness guarantees provided by the auction (i.e., the minimum each trader can expect to receive) and the expected value of the assets returned to the traders. Also, the amount that each trader receives in the equilibrium of the fair combinatorial auction may be higher or lower than what they receive in the equilibrium of the simultaneous auctions used as a benchmark for fairness.
Read more8/23/2024
🔍
0
New!Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samples
Paul Dutting, Thomas Kesselheim, Brendan Lucier, Rebecca Reiffenhauser, Sahil Singla
In online combinatorial allocations/auctions, n bidders sequentially arrive, each with a combinatorial valuation (such as submodular/XOS) over subsets of m indivisible items. The aim is to immediately allocate a subset of the remaining items to maximize the total welfare, defined as the sum of bidder valuations. A long line of work has studied this problem when the bidder valuations come from known independent distributions. In particular, for submodular/XOS valuations, we know 2-competitive algorithms/mechanisms that set a fixed price for each item and the arriving bidders take their favorite subset of the remaining items given these prices. However, these algorithms traditionally presume the availability of the underlying distributions as part of the input to the algorithm. Contrary to this assumption, practical scenarios often require the learning of distributions, a task complicated by limited sample availability. This paper investigates the feasibility of achieving O(1)-competitive algorithms under the realistic constraint of having access to only a limited number of samples from the underlying bidder distributions. Our first main contribution shows that a mere single sample from each bidder distribution is sufficient to yield an O(1)-competitive algorithm for submodular/XOS valuations. This result leverages a novel extension of the secretary-style analysis, employing the sample to have the algorithm compete against itself. Although online, this first approach does not provide an online truthful mechanism. Our second main contribution shows that a polynomial number of samples suffices to yield a $(2+epsilon)$-competitive online truthful mechanism for submodular/XOS valuations and any constant $epsilon>0$. This result is based on a generalization of the median-based algorithm for the single-item prophet inequality problem to combinatorial settings with multiple items.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sequential Combinatorial Auctions
Sai Srivatsa Ravindranath, Zhe Feng, Di Wang, Manzil Zaheer, Aranyak Mehta, David C. Parkes
Revenue-optimal auction design is a challenging problem with significant theoretical and practical implications. Sequential auction mechanisms, known for their simplicity and strong strategyproofness guarantees, are often limited by theoretical results that are largely existential, except for certain restrictive settings. Although traditional reinforcement learning methods such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) are applicable in this domain, they struggle with computational demands and convergence issues when dealing with large and continuous action spaces. In light of this and recognizing that we can model transitions differentiable for our settings, we propose using a new reinforcement learning framework tailored for sequential combinatorial auctions that leverages first-order gradients. Our extensive evaluations show that our approach achieves significant improvement in revenue over both analytical baselines and standard reinforcement learning algorithms. Furthermore, we scale our approach to scenarios involving up to 50 agents and 50 items, demonstrating its applicability in complex, real-world auction settings. As such, this work advances the computational tools available for auction design and contributes to bridging the gap between theoretical results and practical implementations in sequential auction design.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Understanding Iterative Combinatorial Auction Designs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Greg d'Eon, Neil Newman, Kevin Leyton-Brown
Iterative combinatorial auctions are widely used in high stakes settings such as spectrum auctions. Such auctions can be hard to analyze, making it difficult for bidders to determine how to behave and for designers to optimize auction rules to ensure desirable outcomes such as high revenue or welfare. In this paper, we investigate whether multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms can be used to understand iterative combinatorial auctions, given that these algorithms have recently shown empirical success in several other domains. We find that MARL can indeed benefit auction analysis, but that deploying it effectively is nontrivial. We begin by describing modelling decisions that keep the resulting game tractable without sacrificing important features such as imperfect information or asymmetry between bidders. We also discuss how to navigate pitfalls of various MARL algorithms, how to overcome challenges in verifying convergence, and how to generate and interpret multiple equilibria. We illustrate the promise of our resulting approach by using it to evaluate a specific rule change to a clock auction, finding substantially different auction outcomes due to complex changes in bidders' behavior.
Read more7/25/2024