Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samples

Read original: arXiv:2409.11091 - Published 9/18/2024 by Paul Dutting, Thomas Kesselheim, Brendan Lucier, Rebecca Reiffenhauser, Sahil Singla

🔍

Overview

This paper explores online combinatorial allocation and auction problems with limited samples.
It proposes novel algorithms and analyses that achieve strong performance guarantees with only a few samples.
The techniques are applicable to a wide range of real-world settings where data is scarce.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a class of decision-making problems known as online combinatorial allocations and auctions. These problems arise in many real-world scenarios, such as assigning tasks to workers, pricing products in an online marketplace, or optimizing product recommendations.

The key challenge is that the decision-maker often has limited information about the underlying preferences or valuations of the participants, such as buyers or workers. This paper presents novel algorithms and analysis techniques that can achieve strong performance guarantees even when the decision-maker has access to only a few samples of the participants' preferences.

The main idea is to use a "median pricing" approach, where the decision-maker sets prices or allocations based on the median of a small number of samples, rather than relying on full knowledge of the participants' preferences. The authors show that this simple yet effective technique can lead to significant improvements in the decision-maker's performance, compared to approaches that require more extensive data collection.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers online combinatorial allocation and auction problems, where the decision-maker must make a series of decisions (e.g., allocating tasks or setting prices) without full knowledge of the participants' preferences. The authors propose a novel "median pricing" approach, where the decision-maker sets prices or allocations based on the median of a small number of samples, rather than relying on full knowledge of the participants' preferences.

Specifically, the authors analyze the performance of this median pricing approach in two settings: (1) single-item auctions and (2) combinatorial allocations. In both cases, they establish strong performance guarantees, showing that the median pricing approach can achieve near-optimal results with only a few samples.

The key technical insights underlying these results include:

Exploiting the structure of the problem: The authors leverage the specific structure of the online combinatorial allocation and auction problems to design efficient algorithms and prove performance guarantees.
Robust sampling-based techniques: The median pricing approach is shown to be robust to noise and variation in the participants' preferences, requiring only a small number of samples to achieve near-optimal performance.
Novel analysis techniques: The authors develop new analytical tools, including "secretary-style" analyses, to bound the performance of their median pricing algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and practical approach to solving online combinatorial allocation and auction problems with limited data. The main strengths of the research include:

Broad applicability: The techniques developed in this paper can be applied to a wide range of real-world settings, from task allocation to product pricing and recommendation.
Strong performance guarantees: The authors establish rigorous theoretical bounds on the performance of their median pricing approach, showing that it can achieve near-optimal results with only a few samples.
Practical and efficient algorithms: The proposed algorithms are relatively simple to implement and computationally efficient, making them well-suited for real-world deployment.

However, the paper also has some potential limitations and areas for further research:

Assumptions and model simplifications: The analysis in the paper relies on certain simplifying assumptions, such as single-dimensional preferences or the availability of a small number of samples. It would be valuable to explore the performance of these techniques in more complex, real-world scenarios.
Empirical validation: While the theoretical analysis is strong, the paper would benefit from more extensive empirical validation of the proposed algorithms on real-world datasets or realistic simulations.
Extensions to other problem settings: The authors focus on online combinatorial allocation and auction problems, but the core ideas behind the median pricing approach may be applicable to other decision-making problems with limited data.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and promising approach to solving online combinatorial allocation and auction problems with limited data. The key contribution is the development of a median pricing technique that can achieve strong performance guarantees while requiring only a small number of samples of the participants' preferences.

The techniques developed in this paper have the potential to significantly improve decision-making in a wide range of real-world scenarios, from task allocation to product pricing and recommendation. The paper's rigorous theoretical analysis and practical, efficient algorithms make it a valuable contribution to the field of combinatorial optimization and decision-making under uncertainty.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

New!Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samples

Paul Dutting, Thomas Kesselheim, Brendan Lucier, Rebecca Reiffenhauser, Sahil Singla

In online combinatorial allocations/auctions, n bidders sequentially arrive, each with a combinatorial valuation (such as submodular/XOS) over subsets of m indivisible items. The aim is to immediately allocate a subset of the remaining items to maximize the total welfare, defined as the sum of bidder valuations. A long line of work has studied this problem when the bidder valuations come from known independent distributions. In particular, for submodular/XOS valuations, we know 2-competitive algorithms/mechanisms that set a fixed price for each item and the arriving bidders take their favorite subset of the remaining items given these prices. However, these algorithms traditionally presume the availability of the underlying distributions as part of the input to the algorithm. Contrary to this assumption, practical scenarios often require the learning of distributions, a task complicated by limited sample availability. This paper investigates the feasibility of achieving O(1)-competitive algorithms under the realistic constraint of having access to only a limited number of samples from the underlying bidder distributions. Our first main contribution shows that a mere single sample from each bidder distribution is sufficient to yield an O(1)-competitive algorithm for submodular/XOS valuations. This result leverages a novel extension of the secretary-style analysis, employing the sample to have the algorithm compete against itself. Although online, this first approach does not provide an online truthful mechanism. Our second main contribution shows that a polynomial number of samples suffices to yield a $(2+epsilon)$-competitive online truthful mechanism for submodular/XOS valuations and any constant $epsilon>0$. This result is based on a generalization of the median-based algorithm for the single-item prophet inequality problem to combinatorial settings with multiple items.

9/18/2024

🐍

Learning Submodular Sequencing from Samples

Jing Yuan, Shaojie Tang

This paper addresses the problem of sequential submodular maximization: selecting and ranking items in a sequence to optimize some composite submodular function. In contrast to most of the previous works, which assume access to the utility function, we assume that we are given only a set of samples. Each sample includes a random sequence of items and its associated utility. We present an algorithm that, given polynomially many samples drawn from a two-stage uniform distribution, achieves an approximation ratio dependent on the curvature of individual submodular functions. Our results apply in a wide variety of real-world scenarios, such as ranking products in online retail platforms, where complete knowledge of the utility function is often impossible to obtain. Our algorithm gives an empirically useful solution in such contexts, thus proving that limited data can be of great use in sequencing tasks. From a technical perspective, our results extend prior work on ``optimization from samples'' by generalizing from optimizing a set function to a sequence-dependent function.

9/10/2024

🏅

Guided Combinatorial Algorithms for Submodular Maximization

Yixin Chen, Ankur Nath, Chunli Peng, Alan Kuhnle

For constrained, not necessarily monotone submodular maximization, all known approximation algorithms with ratio greater than $1/e$ require continuous ideas, such as queries to the multilinear extension of a submodular function and its gradient, which are typically expensive to simulate with the original set function. For combinatorial algorithms, the best known approximation ratios for both size and matroid constraint are obtained by a simple randomized greedy algorithm of Buchbinder et al. [9]: $1/e approx 0.367$ for size constraint and $0.281$ for the matroid constraint in $mathcal O (kn)$ queries, where $k$ is the rank of the matroid. In this work, we develop the first combinatorial algorithms to break the $1/e$ barrier: we obtain approximation ratio of $0.385$ in $mathcal O (kn)$ queries to the submodular set function for size constraint, and $0.305$ for a general matroid constraint. These are achieved by guiding the randomized greedy algorithm with a fast local search algorithm. Further, we develop deterministic versions of these algorithms, maintaining the same ratio and asymptotic time complexity. Finally, we develop a deterministic, nearly linear time algorithm with ratio $0.377$.

5/24/2024

🤖

On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions

Nika Haghtalab, Michael I. Jordan, Eric Zhao

Social and real-world considerations such as robustness, fairness, social welfare and multi-agent tradeoffs have given rise to multi-distribution learning paradigms, such as collaborative learning, group distributionally robust optimization, and fair federated learning. In each of these settings, a learner seeks to uniformly minimize its expected loss over $n$ predefined data distributions, while using as few samples as possible. In this paper, we establish the optimal sample complexity of these learning paradigms and give algorithms that meet this sample complexity. Importantly, our sample complexity bounds for multi-distribution learning exceed that of learning a single distribution by only an additive factor of $n log(n) / epsilon^2$. This improves upon the best known sample complexity bounds for fair federated learning by Mohri et al. and collaborative learning by Nguyen and Zakynthinou by multiplicative factors of $n$ and $log(n)/epsilon^3$, respectively. We also provide the first sample complexity bounds for the group DRO objective of Sagawa et al. To guarantee these optimal sample complexity bounds, our algorithms learn to sample from data distributions on demand. Our algorithm design and analysis are enabled by our extensions of online learning techniques for solving stochastic zero-sum games. In particular, we contribute stochastic variants of no-regret dynamics that can trade off between players' differing sampling costs.

4/4/2024