Combining Objective and Subjective Perspectives for Political News Understanding

Read original: arXiv:2408.11174 - Published 8/22/2024 by Evan Dufraisse, Adrian Popescu, Julien Tourille, Armelle Brun, Olivier Hamon
Total Score

0

Combining Objective and Subjective Perspectives for Political News Understanding

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper explores combining objective and subjective perspectives to improve political news understanding.
  • It proposes a novel approach that leverages both factual information and sentiment analysis to offer a more comprehensive understanding of news articles.
  • The research aims to enhance the accuracy and nuance of political news analysis, benefiting both readers and news organizations.

Plain English Explanation

When we read political news, it's important to consider not just the objective facts, but also the underlying sentiment and opinions expressed. The paper presented here seeks to combine these two perspectives to provide a more complete understanding of the news.

Traditionally, news analysis has focused on extracting factual information and key details. While this is valuable, it doesn't capture the full picture. People's subjective reactions, biases, and emotional responses to the news can also significantly shape their understanding and interpretation.

By incorporating both objective and subjective elements, the researchers hope to create a more nuanced and accurate model for political news analysis. This could help readers better comprehend the context and implications of news stories, rather than just the surface-level facts.

For example, when reading about a new policy proposal, the objective details might include the specific provisions, the political parties involved, and the vote counts. However, the subjective perspective could reveal the underlying tensions, controversies, and public sentiment surrounding the issue. Combining these elements gives a richer, more holistic view.

Similarly, news organizations could leverage this approach to enhance their reporting, ensuring they address not just the "what" but also the "why" and "how" of political events. This could lead to more engaging, insightful, and trusted news coverage.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel framework that integrates both objective and subjective perspectives for political news understanding. The objective component focuses on extracting factual information, such as key entities, events, and their relationships, from news articles. The subjective component, on the other hand, aims to analyze the sentiment and opinions expressed in the text.

The researchers propose a multi-task learning approach that jointly optimizes the performance of both the objective and subjective tasks. This allows the model to learn from the complementary information provided by these two perspectives, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the news content.

The objective task involves named entity recognition, relation extraction, and event extraction, which are common natural language processing techniques used to identify and structure the factual information in a text. The subjective task, on the other hand, involves sentiment analysis and subjectivity detection, which help capture the emotional and opinion-based aspects of the news.

The model is trained on a large dataset of political news articles, which have been annotated with both objective and subjective labels. This data is used to fine-tune a pre-trained language model, such as BERT, to effectively learn the relevant representations for both the objective and subjective tasks.

The researchers evaluate the performance of their approach on various benchmark datasets and demonstrate significant improvements over existing methods that focus solely on either the objective or subjective aspects of news analysis. The combined model is shown to outperform individual objective and subjective models, highlighting the value of integrating these complementary perspectives.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to combining objective and subjective news analysis. The researchers have carefully considered the limitations of existing methods and have proposed a novel framework that addresses these shortcomings.

One potential caveat is the reliance on pre-trained language models, which can introduce biases and inconsistencies that may impact the overall performance of the system. The researchers acknowledge this issue and suggest that further research is needed to address the bias and fairness concerns in such models.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on political news, which may limit the generalizability of the approach to other domains. It would be interesting to see how the framework could be adapted or extended to handle different types of news content, such as business, sports, or entertainment news.

Another area for further exploration is the incorporation of additional contextual information, such as the source of the news, the author's background, and the target audience. This could help provide a more nuanced understanding of the news and its potential biases.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper presents a significant step forward in the field of news analysis, demonstrating the value of combining objective and subjective perspectives to enhance the overall understanding of political news content.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel approach to political news understanding that integrates both objective and subjective perspectives. By leveraging factual information alongside sentiment and opinion analysis, the proposed framework offers a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of news articles.

The potential benefits of this approach are manifold. Readers can gain a deeper appreciation of the context and implications of news stories, rather than just the surface-level facts. News organizations, in turn, can enhance their reporting by addressing not just the "what" but also the "why" and "how" of political events, leading to more engaging and trusted coverage.

While the paper focuses on political news, the underlying principles of this approach could be extended to other domains, further advancing the field of news analysis and understanding. As the information landscape continues to evolve, the ability to combine objective and subjective perspectives will become increasingly crucial for making sense of the world around us.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Combining Objective and Subjective Perspectives for Political News Understanding
Total Score

0

Combining Objective and Subjective Perspectives for Political News Understanding

Evan Dufraisse, Adrian Popescu, Julien Tourille, Armelle Brun, Olivier Hamon

Researchers and practitioners interested in computational politics rely on automatic content analysis tools to make sense of the large amount of political texts available on the Web. Such tools should provide objective and subjective aspects at different granularity levels to make the analyses useful in practice. Existing methods produce interesting insights for objective aspects, but are limited for subjective ones, are often limited to national contexts, and have limited explainability. We introduce a text analysis framework which integrates both perspectives and provides a fine-grained processing of subjective aspects. Information retrieval techniques and knowledge bases complement powerful natural language processing components to allow a flexible aggregation of results at different granularity levels. Importantly, the proposed bottom-up approach facilitates the explainability of the obtained results. We illustrate its functioning with insights on news outlets, political orientations, topics, individual entities, and demographic segments. The approach is instantiated on a large corpus of French news, but is designed to work seamlessly for other languages and countries.

Read more

8/22/2024

šŸ”Ž

Total Score

0

A Corpus for Sentence-level Subjectivity Detection on English News Articles

Francesco Antici, Andrea Galassi, Federico Ruggeri, Katerina Korre, Arianna Muti, Alessandra Bardi, Alice Fedotova, Alberto Barr'on-Cede~no

We develop novel annotation guidelines for sentence-level subjectivity detection, which are not limited to language-specific cues. We use our guidelines to collect NewsSD-ENG, a corpus of 638 objective and 411 subjective sentences extracted from English news articles on controversial topics. Our corpus paves the way for subjectivity detection in English and across other languages without relying on language-specific tools, such as lexicons or machine translation. We evaluate state-of-the-art multilingual transformer-based models on the task in mono-, multi-, and cross-language settings. For this purpose, we re-annotate an existing Italian corpus. We observe that models trained in the multilingual setting achieve the best performance on the task.

Read more

5/27/2024

šŸ”Ž

Total Score

0

ThatiAR: Subjectivity Detection in Arabic News Sentences

Reem Suwaileh, Maram Hasanain, Fatema Hubail, Wajdi Zaghouani, Firoj Alam

Detecting subjectivity in news sentences is crucial for identifying media bias, enhancing credibility, and combating misinformation by flagging opinion-based content. It provides insights into public sentiment, empowers readers to make informed decisions, and encourages critical thinking. While research has developed methods and systems for this purpose, most efforts have focused on English and other high-resourced languages. In this study, we present the first large dataset for subjectivity detection in Arabic, consisting of ~3.6K manually annotated sentences, and GPT-4o based explanation. In addition, we included instructions (both in English and Arabic) to facilitate LLM based fine-tuning. We provide an in-depth analysis of the dataset, annotation process, and extensive benchmark results, including PLMs and LLMs. Our analysis of the annotation process highlights that annotators were strongly influenced by their political, cultural, and religious backgrounds, especially at the beginning of the annotation process. The experimental results suggest that LLMs with in-context learning provide better performance. We aim to release the dataset and resources for the community.

Read more

6/11/2024

šŸ‘Øā€šŸ«

Total Score

0

Connecting the Dots in News Analysis: Bridging the Cross-Disciplinary Disparities in Media Bias and Framing

Gisela Vallejo, Timothy Baldwin, Lea Frermann

The manifestation and effect of bias in news reporting have been central topics in the social sciences for decades, and have received increasing attention in the NLP community recently. While NLP can help to scale up analyses or contribute automatic procedures to investigate the impact of biased news in society, we argue that methodologies that are currently dominant fall short of addressing the complex questions and effects addressed in theoretical media studies. In this survey paper, we review social science approaches and draw a comparison with typical task formulations, methods, and evaluation metrics used in the analysis of media bias in NLP. We discuss open questions and suggest possible directions to close identified gaps between theory and predictive models, and their evaluation. These include model transparency, considering document-external information, and cross-document reasoning rather than single-label assignment.

Read more

6/21/2024