Come to us first: Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines how community organizations can be centered in AI for Social Good (AI4SG) partnerships
- Highlights the importance of centering community needs and perspectives in AI initiatives
- Emphasizes the role of community organizations as trusted intermediaries in these collaborations
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of centering community organizations in partnerships involving Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG). Community organizations often have deep roots and strong relationships within their communities, making them valuable partners in AI4SG initiatives. By involving these organizations from the outset, researchers and developers can better understand the needs and perspectives of the communities they aim to serve. This can help ensure that AI technologies are implemented in an ethical and inclusive manner, addressing real community challenges rather than imposing solutions from the outside.
The paper emphasizes the role of community organizations as "trusted intermediaries" between AI practitioners and the communities they seek to impact. These organizations can help articulate the needs and concerns of community members, as well as navigate potential power imbalances and cultural differences that may arise in these cross-sector collaborations. By centering community voices and priorities, the authors argue that AI4SG initiatives can be more effectively designed and implemented to drive meaningful, sustainable change.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a qualitative study that explores how community organizations can be centered in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) partnerships. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with representatives from 22 community organizations across the United States, as well as 10 AI practitioners involved in AI4SG initiatives.
Through their analysis, the authors identify several key themes. First, they highlight the importance of community organizations serving as "trusted intermediaries" between AI practitioners and the communities they aim to serve. These organizations can help articulate community needs and concerns, as well as navigate potential power imbalances and cultural differences that may arise in these cross-sector collaborations.
The researchers also emphasize the need to center community priorities and perspectives from the outset of AI4SG initiatives, rather than treating community organizations as mere "end-users" or "beneficiaries" of these technologies. By involving community organizations throughout the entire process, from problem definition to solution development and deployment, the authors argue that AI4SG initiatives can be more effectively designed and implemented to drive meaningful, sustainable change.
Finally, the paper highlights several challenges and tensions that can arise in these partnerships, such as concerns around data privacy and security, unequal power dynamics, and the potential for AI technologies to reinforce or exacerbate existing societal inequities. The authors provide recommendations for how these issues can be navigated and addressed to foster more equitable and impactful collaborations.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for centering community organizations in AI4SG partnerships, emphasizing their role as trusted intermediaries and the importance of incorporating community perspectives from the outset. The qualitative approach used in the study provides valuable insights into the experiences and concerns of both community organizations and AI practitioners, offering a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in these collaborations.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific types of AI technologies or application domains involved in the partnerships, which could influence the dynamics and considerations at play.
Further research could explore how the principles and recommendations outlined in the paper translate to different AI4SG contexts, such as AI applications in social work or community-based AI development. Investigating the long-term impacts and sustainability of these community-centered partnerships would also be valuable in understanding their effectiveness in driving meaningful change.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of centering community organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) partnerships. By positioning these organizations as trusted intermediaries and incorporating their perspectives from the outset, the authors argue that AI4SG initiatives can be more effectively designed and implemented to address real community needs and drive sustainable, equitable change. The insights and recommendations provided in this study offer valuable guidance for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to develop more inclusive and impactful AI for social good.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Come to us first: Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships
Hongjin Lin, Naveena Karusala, Chinasa T. Okolo, Catherine D'Ignazio, Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) has emerged as a growing body of research and practice exploring the potential of AI technologies to tackle social issues. This area emphasizes interdisciplinary partnerships with community organizations, such as non-profits and government agencies. However, amidst excitement about new advances in AI and their potential impact, the needs, expectations, and aspirations of these community organizations--and whether they are being met--are not well understood. Understanding these factors is important to ensure that the considerable efforts by AI teams and community organizations can actually achieve the positive social impact they strive for. Drawing on the Data Feminism framework, we explored the perspectives of community organization members on their partnerships with AI teams through 16 semi-structured interviews. Our study highlights the pervasive influence of funding agendas and the optimism surrounding AI's potential. Despite the significant intellectual contributions and labor provided by community organization members, their goals were frequently sidelined in favor of other stakeholders, including AI teams. While many community organization members expected tangible project deployment, only two out of 14 projects we studied reached the deployment stage. However, community organization members sustained their belief in the potential of the projects, still seeing diminished goals as valuable. To enhance the efficacy of future collaborations, our participants shared their aspirations for success, calling for co-leadership starting from the early stages of projects. We propose data co-liberation as a grounding principle for approaching AI4SG moving forward, positing that community organizations' co-leadership is essential for fostering more effective, sustainable, and ethical development of AI.
Read more9/12/2024
0
Articulation Work and Tinkering for Fairness in Machine Learning
Miriam Fahimi, Mayra Russo, Kristen M. Scott, Maria-Esther Vidal, Bettina Berendt, Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda
The field of fair AI aims to counter biased algorithms through computational modelling. However, it faces increasing criticism for perpetuating the use of overly technical and reductionist methods. As a result, novel approaches appear in the field to address more socially-oriented and interdisciplinary (SOI) perspectives on fair AI. In this paper, we take this dynamic as the starting point to study the tension between computer science (CS) and SOI research. By drawing on STS and CSCW theory, we position fair AI research as a matter of 'organizational alignment': what makes research 'doable' is the successful alignment of three levels of work organization (the social world, the laboratory, and the experiment). Based on qualitative interviews with CS researchers, we analyze the tasks, resources, and actors required for doable research in the case of fair AI. We find that CS researchers engage with SOI research to some extent, but organizational conditions, articulation work, and ambiguities of the social world constrain the doability of SOI research for them. Based on our findings, we identify and discuss problems for aligning CS and SOI as fair AI continues to evolve.
Read more8/29/2024
🤖
0
Reimagining AI in Social Work: Practitioner Perspectives on Incorporating Technology in their Practice
Katie Wassal, Carolyn Ashurst, Jiri Hron, Miri Zilka
There has been a surge in the number and type of AI tools being tested and deployed within both national and local government in the UK, including within the social care sector. Given the many ongoing and planned future developments, the time is ripe to review and reflect on the state of AI in social care. We do so by conducting semi-structured interviews with UK-based social work professionals about their experiences and opinions of past and current AI systems. Our aim is to understand what systems would practitioners like to see developed and how. We find that all our interviewees had overwhelmingly negative past experiences of technology in social care, unanimous aversion to algorithmic decision systems in particular, but also strong interest in AI applications that could allow them to spend less time on administrative tasks. In response to our findings, we offer a series of concrete recommendations, which include commitment to participatory design, as well as the necessity of regaining practitioner trust.
Read more7/16/2024
🔎
0
A social path to human-like artificial intelligence
Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo
Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.
Read more5/28/2024