Reimagining AI in Social Work: Practitioner Perspectives on Incorporating Technology in their Practice

Read original: arXiv:2407.10244 - Published 7/16/2024 by Katie Wassal, Carolyn Ashurst, Jiri Hron, Miri Zilka
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores how social work practitioners in the United States view the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology into their practice.
  • The study examines practitioners' perspectives on the opportunities and challenges of incorporating AI tools to support their work with clients.
  • The researchers conducted interviews with social workers to understand their experiences, concerns, and vision for the role of AI in the social work field.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates how social workers in the US think about using AI technology as part of their jobs. Social workers play a crucial role in supporting individuals and families facing various challenges. The researchers wanted to understand what social workers see as the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating AI tools into their practice.

To do this, they interviewed social workers to get their perspectives. The social workers shared their experiences, concerns, and ideas for how AI could (or should) be used in social work. This provides valuable insights into how practitioners in the field view the role of AI technology in their work with clients.

The findings from this study can help guide the development and implementation of AI systems in the social work domain. By understanding the practitioners' perspectives, researchers and technology companies can work to create AI tools that address the needs and concerns of social workers. This could lead to more effective and ethical use of AI in supporting vulnerable populations.

Technical Explanation

This study used a qualitative research approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with 25 social work practitioners in the United States. The interviews explored the practitioners' experiences, perceptions, and vision for the integration of AI technology into social work practice.

The researchers analyzed the interview transcripts using a thematic analysis approach. This involved identifying recurring themes and patterns in the practitioners' responses. The key themes that emerged included:

  1. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/studying-up-public-sector-ai-how-networks">Opportunities of AI integration</a>: Social workers saw potential for AI to assist with tasks like client intake, information gathering, and service referrals. They also viewed AI as a tool to enhance their clinical decision-making and free up time for direct client interactions.

  2. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/trust-ai-progress-challenges-future-directions">Concerns about AI integration</a>: Practitioners expressed worries about the impact of AI on the therapeutic relationship, client privacy and data security, and the potential for algorithmic bias to perpetuate societal inequities.

  3. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ai-social-theory">Vision for human-AI collaboration</a>: Social workers envisioned a future where AI is used to augment and complement their professional expertise, rather than replace their role. They emphasized the importance of maintaining human judgment and the relational aspects of social work practice.

The findings highlight the need for <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/now-later-lasting-ten-priorities-ai-research">thoughtful integration of AI in the social work field</a>. Practitioners see both opportunities and challenges, and their perspectives should be central to the design and deployment of AI systems in this domain.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of social work practitioners, who are key stakeholders in the potential integration of AI technology into their field. However, the research is limited by its relatively small sample size and focus on social workers in the United States.

Additional research may be needed to explore how social work practitioners in other cultural and institutional contexts view the role of AI in their practice. Furthermore, the study does not delve deeply into the potential <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/societal-adaptation-to-advanced-ai">societal implications</a> of AI integration in social work, such as issues of equity, accessibility, and the broader impacts on vulnerable populations.

As AI systems become more advanced, it will be crucial to consider the unique ethical and practical considerations that arise in the social work field. The concerns raised by the practitioners in this study highlight the need for collaborative, human-centered approaches to developing and implementing AI tools that truly support the goals and values of the social work profession.

Conclusion

This research paper provides valuable insights into how social work practitioners in the United States view the integration of AI technology into their practice. The key findings suggest that while social workers see potential benefits, they also have significant concerns about the impact of AI on their work and the well-being of their clients.

The practitioners' perspectives emphasize the importance of maintaining the relational and human-centered aspects of social work, even as AI tools are introduced to support and complement their expertise. This study underscores the need for thoughtful, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/societal-adaptation-to-advanced-ai">collaborative approaches to AI integration</a> in the social work field, with a focus on addressing ethical considerations and empowering practitioners to shape the development and use of these technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Reimagining AI in Social Work: Practitioner Perspectives on Incorporating Technology in their Practice

Katie Wassal, Carolyn Ashurst, Jiri Hron, Miri Zilka

There has been a surge in the number and type of AI tools being tested and deployed within both national and local government in the UK, including within the social care sector. Given the many ongoing and planned future developments, the time is ripe to review and reflect on the state of AI in social care. We do so by conducting semi-structured interviews with UK-based social work professionals about their experiences and opinions of past and current AI systems. Our aim is to understand what systems would practitioners like to see developed and how. We find that all our interviewees had overwhelmingly negative past experiences of technology in social care, unanimous aversion to algorithmic decision systems in particular, but also strong interest in AI applications that could allow them to spend less time on administrative tasks. In response to our findings, we offer a series of concrete recommendations, which include commitment to participatory design, as well as the necessity of regaining practitioner trust.

Read more

7/16/2024

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
Total Score

0

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o

Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.

Read more

7/18/2024

Come to us first: Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships
Total Score

0

Come to us first: Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships

Hongjin Lin, Naveena Karusala, Chinasa T. Okolo, Catherine D'Ignazio, Krzysztof Z. Gajos

Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) has emerged as a growing body of research and practice exploring the potential of AI technologies to tackle social issues. This area emphasizes interdisciplinary partnerships with community organizations, such as non-profits and government agencies. However, amidst excitement about new advances in AI and their potential impact, the needs, expectations, and aspirations of these community organizations--and whether they are being met--are not well understood. Understanding these factors is important to ensure that the considerable efforts by AI teams and community organizations can actually achieve the positive social impact they strive for. Drawing on the Data Feminism framework, we explored the perspectives of community organization members on their partnerships with AI teams through 16 semi-structured interviews. Our study highlights the pervasive influence of funding agendas and the optimism surrounding AI's potential. Despite the significant intellectual contributions and labor provided by community organization members, their goals were frequently sidelined in favor of other stakeholders, including AI teams. While many community organization members expected tangible project deployment, only two out of 14 projects we studied reached the deployment stage. However, community organization members sustained their belief in the potential of the projects, still seeing diminished goals as valuable. To enhance the efficacy of future collaborations, our participants shared their aspirations for success, calling for co-leadership starting from the early stages of projects. We propose data co-liberation as a grounding principle for approaching AI4SG moving forward, positing that community organizations' co-leadership is essential for fostering more effective, sustainable, and ethical development of AI.

Read more

9/12/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use

Anna Kawakami, Amanda Coston, Hoda Heidari, Kenneth Holstein, Haiyi Zhu

As public sector agencies rapidly introduce new AI tools in high-stakes domains like social services, it becomes critical to understand how decisions to adopt these tools are made in practice. We borrow from the anthropological practice to ``study up'' those in positions of power, and reorient our study of public sector AI around those who have the power and responsibility to make decisions about the role that AI tools will play in their agency. Through semi-structured interviews and design activities with 16 agency decision-makers, we examine how decisions about AI design and adoption are influenced by their interactions with and assumptions about other actors within these agencies (e.g., frontline workers and agency leaders), as well as those above (legal systems and contracted companies), and below (impacted communities). By centering these networks of power relations, our findings shed light on how infrastructural, legal, and social factors create barriers and disincentives to the involvement of a broader range of stakeholders in decisions about AI design and adoption. Agency decision-makers desired more practical support for stakeholder involvement around public sector AI to help overcome the knowledge and power differentials they perceived between them and other stakeholders (e.g., frontline workers and impacted community members). Building on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and policy around actualizing participatory AI approaches in public sector contexts.

Read more

5/22/2024