Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a "competitive retrieval" framework that goes beyond the typical single-query approach in information retrieval systems.
- The authors investigate how users can strategically interact with retrieval systems to achieve their goals, drawing insights from game theory.
- The research examines the dynamics between users and retrieval systems, with a focus on how users can leverage multiple queries to outperform a system optimized for a single query.
Plain English Explanation
Traditional information retrieval systems typically rely on a single query from the user to find relevant documents. However, in the Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query paper, the authors explore a more interactive approach where users can strategically use multiple queries to achieve their goals.
The researchers draw insights from game theory to understand the dynamics between users and retrieval systems. They investigate how users can leverage multiple queries to outperform a system that is optimized for a single query. This competitive framework offers a more nuanced way of thinking about information retrieval, where users and systems engage in a strategic back-and-forth to find the most relevant information.
By considering this competitive dynamic, the paper provides a new perspective on the interplay between users and retrieval systems. It suggests that future information retrieval systems may need to account for users' strategic behavior and adapt accordingly to provide the best possible results.
Technical Explanation
The Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query paper proposes a game-theoretic analysis of the interaction between users and information retrieval systems. The authors model this interaction as a two-player game, where the user aims to find the most relevant documents, and the retrieval system tries to optimize its responses to a single query.
The paper explores how users can leverage multiple queries to outperform a system that is optimized for a single query. This competitive framework allows the authors to analyze the strategic choices made by both the user and the system, and how these choices impact the overall retrieval performance.
The researchers also investigate the impact of various query generation strategies on the user's ability to outperform the system. They examine approaches like Surprising Effectiveness of Rankers Trained on Expanded Queries and Improving Health Question Answering with Reliable, Time-Aware Retrieval, and how they can be leveraged in the competitive retrieval setting.
The game-theoretic analysis provides insights into the factors that influence the success of users in this competitive retrieval framework, such as the system's objective function, the user's knowledge of the system's capabilities, and the availability of relevant documents in the corpus.
Critical Analysis
The Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query paper presents a novel and thought-provoking perspective on information retrieval, but it also raises some potential concerns and limitations.
One key limitation is that the game-theoretic framework assumes a highly rational and strategic user, which may not always reflect real-world user behavior. In practice, users may have varying levels of knowledge about the retrieval system and may not always act in a purely strategic manner.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversarial behavior, where users might try to game the system in ways that undermine its intended purpose. This could be an important consideration, especially in sensitive domains like healthcare or finance.
The authors also acknowledge that their analysis relies on several simplifying assumptions, such as the availability of relevant documents in the corpus and the ability of the user to accurately model the system's objective function. In real-world scenarios, these assumptions may not always hold true, and the competitive dynamics may be more complex.
Despite these limitations, the Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query paper offers a valuable new perspective on information retrieval that encourages users and system designers to think more strategically about their interactions. As the field continues to evolve, incorporating insights from game theory and other disciplines may lead to more effective and user-centric retrieval systems.
Conclusion
The Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query paper presents a game-theoretic analysis of the interaction between users and information retrieval systems. It explores how users can leverage multiple queries to outperform a system that is optimized for a single query, offering a new perspective on the dynamics between users and retrieval systems.
While the paper raises some important considerations and limitations, it also suggests that future information retrieval systems may need to account for users' strategic behavior and adapt accordingly to provide the best possible results. By incorporating insights from game theory and other disciplines, the field of information retrieval may evolve in ways that better support users' information-seeking goals.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Competitive Retrieval: Going Beyond the Single Query
Haya Nachimovsky, Moshe Tennenholtz, Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland
Previous work on the competitive retrieval setting focused on a single-query setting: document authors manipulate their documents so as to improve their future ranking for a given query. We study a competitive setting where authors opt to improve their document's ranking for multiple queries. We use game theoretic analysis to prove that equilibrium does not necessarily exist. We then empirically show that it is more difficult for authors to improve their documents' rankings for multiple queries with a neural ranker than with a state-of-the-art feature-based ranker. We also present an effective approach for predicting the document most highly ranked in the next induced ranking.
Read more4/16/2024
📶
0
The Search for Stability: Learning Dynamics of Strategic Publishers with Initial Documents
Omer Madmon, Idan Pipano, Itamar Reinman, Moshe Tennenholtz
We study a game-theoretic information retrieval model in which strategic publishers aim to maximize their chances of being ranked first by the search engine while maintaining the integrity of their original documents. We show that the commonly used Probability Ranking Principle (PRP) ranking scheme results in an unstable environment where games often fail to reach pure Nash equilibrium. We propose two families of ranking functions that do not adhere to the PRP principle. We provide both theoretical and empirical evidence that these methods lead to a stable search ecosystem, by providing positive results on the learning dynamics convergence. We also define the publishers' and users' welfare, demonstrate a possible publisher-user trade-off, and provide means for a search system designer to control it. Finally, we show how instability harms long-term users' welfare.
Read more5/21/2024
0
MrRank: Improving Question Answering Retrieval System through Multi-Result Ranking Model
Danupat Khamnuansin, Tawunrat Chalothorn, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with hallucinations and outdated information. To address this, Information Retrieval (IR) systems can be employed to augment LLMs with up-to-date knowledge. However, existing IR techniques contain deficiencies, posing a performance bottleneck. Given the extensive array of IR systems, combining diverse approaches presents a viable strategy. Nevertheless, prior attempts have yielded restricted efficacy. In this work, we propose an approach that leverages learning-to-rank techniques to combine heterogeneous IR systems. We demonstrate the method on two Retrieval Question Answering (ReQA) tasks. Our empirical findings exhibit a significant performance enhancement, outperforming previous approaches and achieving state-of-the-art results on ReQA SQuAD.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Generalized Contrastive Learning for Multi-Modal Retrieval and Ranking
Tianyu Zhu, Myong Chol Jung, Jesse Clark
Contrastive learning has gained widespread adoption for retrieval tasks due to its minimal requirement for manual annotations. However, popular contrastive frameworks typically learn from binary relevance, making them ineffective at incorporating direct fine-grained rankings. In this paper, we curate a large-scale dataset featuring detailed relevance scores for each query-document pair to facilitate future research and evaluation. Subsequently, we propose Generalized Contrastive Learning for Multi-Modal Retrieval and Ranking (GCL), which is designed to learn from fine-grained rankings beyond binary relevance scores. Our results show that GCL achieves a 94.5% increase in NDCG@10 for in-domain and 26.3 to 48.8% increases for cold-start evaluations, all relative to the CLIP baseline and involving ground truth rankings.
Read more4/15/2024