Complexity as Design Material
2
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the idea of using complexity as a design material in creative and technological applications.
- It examines how embracing complexity can lead to more nuanced, expressive, and meaningful experiences.
- The paper discusses related work on complexity in various fields and presents a framework for leveraging complexity as a design tool.
Plain English Explanation
The paper suggests that rather than trying to simplify things, designers and developers should consider embracing the inherent complexity of the world around us. [object Object] can be thought of as the richness and interconnectedness of the elements that make up a system or experience.
Instead of always aiming for simplicity and efficiency, the authors argue that complexity can be used as a [object Object] - something that can be intentionally incorporated into the creative process to produce more nuanced, expressive, and meaningful outcomes. Just as artists work with physical materials like paint or clay, designers could learn to work with the intangible "material" of complexity.
By welcoming complexity, the authors believe we can create [object Object] that better reflect the true nature of the world and our lived experiences. This could lead to more authentic, engaging, and impactful interactions.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing relevant literature on [object Object], including its various definitions and applications across disciplines. It notes that complexity is often viewed as a challenge to be overcome, rather than a resource to be leveraged.
The authors then propose a framework for considering complexity as a design material. This involves deliberately incorporating complex elements, relationships, and behaviors into the design process, rather than always striving for simplification. They suggest that this approach can lead to richer, more expressive, and more meaningful experiences.
The paper explores several potential applications of this "complexity as design material" concept, such as in the creation of interactive systems, data visualizations, and immersive experiences. It discusses how designers can use techniques like [object Object] to harness complexity and create engaging, adaptive, and responsive designs.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and thought-provoking argument for reconsidering how we approach complexity in design and technology. However, it does not delve deeply into the practical challenges of implementing this approach, such as the potential tradeoffs between complexity and usability, or the difficulties in predicting and managing the behavior of complex systems.
Additionally, the paper could have explored more specific case studies or examples to illustrate how the "complexity as design material" concept has been applied in real-world contexts. This would have helped readers better understand the practical implications and potential benefits of this approach.
Overall, the paper makes a strong case for a paradigm shift in how we think about complexity, but further research and practical experimentation may be needed to fully develop and refine this design philosophy.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that complexity is inherently problematic and should be minimized or eliminated. Instead, it proposes that designers and developers should embrace complexity as a [object Object] - a material to be intentionally incorporated into the design process to create more nuanced, expressive, and meaningful experiences.
By reconceptualizing complexity in this way, the authors believe we can move beyond the endless pursuit of simplicity and efficiency, and instead harness the richness and interconnectedness of the world around us. This could lead to the development of [object Object] that better reflect the complexity of human existence.
While the practical implementation of this approach may present some challenges, the paper's core message is a compelling and timely one, with the potential to inspire new ways of thinking about design and technology in the years to come.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
2
Complexity as Design Material
Florian Windhager, Alfie Abduhl-Rahman, Mark-Jan Bludau, Nicole Hengesbach, Houda Lamqaddam, Isabell Meirelles, Bettina Speckmann, Michael Correll
Complexity is often seen as a inherent negative in information design, with the job of the designer being to reduce or eliminate complexity, and with principles like Tufte's data-ink ratio or chartjunk to operationalize minimalism and simplicity in visualizations. However, in this position paper, we call for a more expansive view of complexity as a design material, like color or texture or shape: an element of information design that can be used in many ways, many of which are beneficial to the goals of using data to understand the world around us. We describe complexity as a phenomenon that occurs not just in visual design but in every aspect of the sensemaking process, from data collection to interpretation. For each of these stages, we present examples of ways that these various forms of complexity can be used (or abused) in visualization design. We ultimately call on the visualization community to build a more nuanced view of complexity, to look for places to usefully integrate complexity in multiple stages of the design process, and, even when the goal is to reduce complexity, to look for the non-visual forms of complexity that may have otherwise been overlooked.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Design-Specific Transformations in Visualization
Eugene Wu, Remco Chang
In visualization, the process of transforming raw data into visually comprehensible representations is pivotal. While existing models like the Information Visualization Reference Model describe the data-to-visual mapping process, they often overlook a crucial intermediary step: design-specific transformations. This process, occurring after data transformation but before visual-data mapping, further derives data, such as groupings, layout, and statistics, that are essential to properly render the visualization. In this paper, we advocate for a deeper exploration of design-specific transformations, highlighting their importance in understanding visualization properties, particularly in relation to user tasks. We incorporate design-specific transformations into the Information Visualization Reference Model and propose a new formalism that encompasses the user task as a function over data. The resulting formalism offers three key benefits over existing visualization models: (1) describing task as compositions of functions, (2) enabling analysis of data transformations for visual-data mapping, and (3) empowering reasoning about visualization correctness and effectiveness. We further discuss the potential implications of this model on visualization theory and visualization experiment design.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Quantifying Emotional Responses to Immutable Data Characteristics and Designer Choices in Data Visualizations
Carter Blair, Xiyao Wang, Charles Perin
Emotion is an important factor to consider when designing visualizations as it can impact the amount of trust viewers place in a visualization, how well they can retrieve information and understand the underlying data, and how much they engage with or connect to a visualization. We conducted five crowdsourced experiments to quantify the effects of color, chart type, data trend, data variability and data density on emotion (measured through self-reported arousal and valence). Results from our experiments show that there are multiple design elements which influence the emotion induced by a visualization and, more surprisingly, that certain data characteristics influence the emotion of viewers even when the data has no meaning. In light of these findings, we offer guidelines on how to use color, scale, and chart type to counterbalance and emphasize the emotional impact of immutable data characteristics.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Simplicity in Complexity : Explaining Visual Complexity using Deep Segmentation Models
Tingke Shen, Surabhi S Nath, Aenne Brielmann, Peter Dayan
The complexity of visual stimuli plays an important role in many cognitive phenomena, including attention, engagement, memorability, time perception and aesthetic evaluation. Despite its importance, complexity is poorly understood and ironically, previous models of image complexity have been quite complex. There have been many attempts to find handcrafted features that explain complexity, but these features are usually dataset specific, and hence fail to generalise. On the other hand, more recent work has employed deep neural networks to predict complexity, but these models remain difficult to interpret, and do not guide a theoretical understanding of the problem. Here we propose to model complexity using segment-based representations of images. We use state-of-the-art segmentation models, SAM and FC-CLIP, to quantify the number of segments at multiple granularities, and the number of classes in an image respectively. We find that complexity is well-explained by a simple linear model with these two features across six diverse image-sets of naturalistic scene and art images. This suggests that the complexity of images can be surprisingly simple.
Read more5/7/2024