A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Mental Illnesses
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Comprehensive evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on mental health tasks
- Explores the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in identifying and understanding mental illnesses
- Aims to provide insights into the potential use of LLMs for mental health applications
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how well large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text - can handle tasks related to mental health and illnesses. The researchers wanted to see if these advanced AI systems could be useful for applications in mental healthcare, such as identifying mental health conditions or providing insights into people's mental state.
To do this, the researchers tested several popular LLMs on a variety of mental health-related tasks, like classifying if a piece of text indicates the presence of a mental illness, or assessing the sentiment and emotional tone of text about mental health topics. The goal was to get a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of these LLMs when it comes to mental health applications.
The findings provide valuable insights into the current capabilities of LLMs in this domain. While the models showed some promise, the researchers also identified important areas where LLMs struggle, such as fully capturing the nuance and complexity of mental health issues. This information can help guide the development of LLMs and their potential use in mental healthcare applications going forward.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of several large language models (LLMs) on a range of mental health-related tasks. The researchers tested models like GPT-3, BERT, and PaLM on classification, sentiment analysis, and other benchmarks designed to assess the models' ability to identify and understand mental illnesses.
The experimental design involved fine-tuning the LLMs on mental health datasets and evaluating their performance on held-out test sets. The researchers also compared the LLM results to human expert assessments to gauge how the models stack up against clinical expertise.
The paper provides detailed insights into the varying capabilities of different LLMs across the mental health tasks. While the models showed promising results in some areas, such as accurately classifying the presence of mental illness symptoms, they also struggled with capturing the full nuance and complexity of mental health issues. The researchers identified several limitations and potential biases in the LLMs' understanding of mental health.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a thorough and balanced assessment of LLM performance on mental health tasks. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, such as the potential biases in the datasets used and the challenges of evaluating models on highly subjective and complex mental health concepts.
One area that could be explored further is the interpretability of the LLMs' decision-making processes. Understanding how the models arrive at their assessments of mental health could provide valuable insights for deploying these systems in real-world applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical considerations of using LLMs for mental health applications. Issues around privacy, data bias, and the potential for misuse or misinterpretation of the model outputs should be carefully considered as this technology progresses.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to understanding the current state of LLM capabilities in the mental health domain. The findings suggest that while these models show promise, there is still significant work needed to develop reliable and trustworthy AI systems for mental healthcare applications.
Conclusion
This comprehensive evaluation of LLMs on mental health tasks provides important insights into the current capabilities and limitations of these advanced AI systems. The findings suggest that while LLMs can show promise in certain mental health-related applications, such as symptom identification, they still struggle to fully capture the nuance and complexity of mental health issues.
The research highlights the need for continued development and careful, ethical deployment of LLMs in mental healthcare settings. As this technology progresses, it will be crucial to address the limitations and potential biases identified in this study to ensure these systems can be reliably and responsibly applied to support mental health services and improve patient outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Mental Illnesses
Abdelrahman Hanafi, Mohammed Saad, Noureldin Zahran, Radwa J. Hanafy, Mohammed E. Fouda
Large language models have shown promise in various domains, including healthcare. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs in the context of mental health tasks using social media data. We explore the zero-shot (ZS) and few-shot (FS) capabilities of various LLMs, including GPT-4, Llama 3, Gemini, and others, on tasks such as binary disorder detection, disorder severity evaluation, and psychiatric knowledge assessment. Our evaluation involved 33 models testing 9 main prompt templates across the tasks. Key findings revealed that models like GPT-4 and Llama 3 exhibited superior performance in binary disorder detection, with accuracies reaching up to 85% on certain datasets. Moreover, prompt engineering played a crucial role in enhancing model performance. Notably, the Mixtral 8x22b model showed an improvement of over 20%, while Gemma 7b experienced a similar boost in performance. In the task of disorder severity evaluation, we observed that FS learning significantly improved the model's accuracy, highlighting the importance of contextual examples in complex assessments. Notably, the Phi-3-mini model exhibited a substantial increase in performance, with balanced accuracy improving by over 6.80% and mean average error dropping by nearly 1.3 when moving from ZS to FS learning. In the psychiatric knowledge task, recent models generally outperformed older, larger counterparts, with the Llama 3.1 405b achieving an accuracy of 91.2%. Despite promising results, our analysis identified several challenges, including variability in performance across datasets and the need for careful prompt engineering. Furthermore, the ethical guards imposed by many LLM providers hamper the ability to accurately evaluate their performance, due to tendency to not respond to potentially sensitive queries.
Read more9/25/2024
0
New!Severity Prediction in Mental Health: LLM-based Creation, Analysis, Evaluation of a Novel Multilingual Dataset
Konstantinos Skianis, John Pavlopoulos, A. Seza Dou{g}ruoz
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various medical fields, including mental health support systems. However, there is a gap in research regarding the effectiveness of LLMs in non-English mental health support applications. To address this problem, we present a novel multilingual adaptation of widely-used mental health datasets, translated from English into six languages (Greek, Turkish, French, Portuguese, German, and Finnish). This dataset enables a comprehensive evaluation of LLM performance in detecting mental health conditions and assessing their severity across multiple languages. By experimenting with GPT and Llama, we observe considerable variability in performance across languages, despite being evaluated on the same translated dataset. This inconsistency underscores the complexities inherent in multilingual mental health support, where language-specific nuances and mental health data coverage can affect the accuracy of the models. Through comprehensive error analysis, we emphasize the risks of relying exclusively on large language models (LLMs) in medical settings (e.g., their potential to contribute to misdiagnoses). Moreover, our proposed approach offers significant cost savings for multilingual tasks, presenting a major advantage for broad-scale implementation.
Read more9/27/2024
💬
0
Large Language Model for Mental Health: A Systematic Review
Zhijun Guo, Alvina Lai, Johan Hilge Thygesen, Joseph Farrington, Thomas Keen, Kezhi Li
Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for potential applications in digital health, while their application in mental health is subject to ongoing debate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the usage of LLMs in mental health, focusing on their strengths and limitations in early screening, digital interventions, and clinical applications. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, JMIR, and ACM using keywords: 'mental health OR mental illness OR mental disorder OR psychiatry' AND 'large language models'. We included articles published between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2024, excluding non-English articles. 30 articles were evaluated, which included research on mental health conditions and suicidal ideation detection through text (n=15), usage of LLMs for mental health conversational agents (CAs) (n=7), and other applications and evaluations of LLMs in mental health (n=18). LLMs exhibit substantial effectiveness in detecting mental health issues and providing accessible, de-stigmatized eHealth services. However, the current risks associated with the clinical use might surpass their benefits. The study identifies several significant issues: the lack of multilingual datasets annotated by experts, concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the content generated, challenges in interpretability due to the 'black box' nature of LLMs, and persistent ethical dilemmas. These include the lack of a clear ethical framework, concerns about data privacy, and the potential for over-reliance on LLMs by both therapists and patients, which could compromise traditional medical practice. Despite these issues, the rapid development of LLMs underscores their potential as new clinical aids, emphasizing the need for continued research and development in this area.
Read more8/14/2024
💬
0
Applying and Evaluating Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: A Scoping Review of Human-Assessed Generative Tasks
Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Zehan Li, Fenglin Liu, Xiao Fang, David Clifton, John Torous
Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as promising tools for mental health care, offering scalable support through their ability to generate human-like responses. However, the effectiveness of these models in clinical settings remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to assess the current generative applications of LLMs in mental health care, focusing on studies where these models were tested with human participants in real-world scenarios. A systematic search across APA PsycNet, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science identified 726 unique articles, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. These studies encompassed applications such as clinical assistance, counseling, therapy, and emotional support. However, the evaluation methods were often non-standardized, with most studies relying on ad hoc scales that limit comparability and robustness. Privacy, safety, and fairness were also frequently underexplored. Moreover, reliance on proprietary models, such as OpenAI's GPT series, raises concerns about transparency and reproducibility. While LLMs show potential in expanding mental health care access, especially in underserved areas, the current evidence does not fully support their use as standalone interventions. More rigorous, standardized evaluations and ethical oversight are needed to ensure these tools can be safely and effectively integrated into clinical practice.
Read more8/22/2024