Large Language Model for Mental Health: A Systematic Review

Read original: arXiv:2403.15401 - Published 8/14/2024 by Zhijun Guo, Alvina Lai, Johan Hilge Thygesen, Joseph Farrington, Thomas Keen, Kezhi Li
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This systematic review evaluates the usage of large language models (LLMs) in mental health, examining their strengths and limitations in early screening, digital interventions, and clinical applications.
  • The researchers searched multiple databases and included 30 articles published between 2017 and 2023, covering topics such as mental illness and suicidal ideation detection, usage of LLMs for mental health conversational agents, and other applications of LLMs in mental health.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence that can process and generate human-like text. Researchers have been exploring how these models could be used in the field of mental health. This systematic review, which follows the PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the current state of research on using LLMs for mental health applications.

The researchers searched various databases and found 30 relevant articles published between 2017 and 2023. These articles covered different ways LLMs are being used in mental health, including:

The review found that LLMs show promise in providing accessible, de-stigmatized mental health services. However, there are also significant concerns about the clinical use of these models, such as the lack of accurate, expert-annotated datasets, the reliability of the content generated, and the interpretability of these "black box" models. There are also ethical issues to consider, like data privacy and the potential for over-reliance on LLMs by both healthcare providers and patients.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the usage of large language models (LLMs) in mental health. They searched four databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and JMIR) using keywords related to mental health and LLMs, and included articles published between 2017 and 2023 in English.

Out of the 30 articles included in the review, 12 focused on the use of LLMs for detecting mental illness and suicidal ideation through text analysis, 5 explored the usage of LLMs for mental health conversational agents, and 13 addressed other applications and evaluations of LLMs in mental health.

The review found that LLMs exhibit substantial effectiveness in identifying mental health issues and providing accessible, de-stigmatized digital health services. However, the researchers identified several significant concerns about the clinical use of these models, including:

  • The lack of multilingual datasets annotated by mental health experts
  • Doubts about the accuracy and reliability of the content generated by LLMs
  • Challenges in interpreting the "black box" nature of these models
  • Persistent ethical dilemmas, such as the lack of a clear ethical framework, data privacy concerns, and the potential for over-reliance on LLMs by both therapists and patients, which could compromise traditional medical practice.

Despite these issues, the rapid development of LLMs underscores their potential as new clinical aids, emphasizing the need for continued research and development in this area.

Critical Analysis

The systematic review provides a thorough and balanced assessment of the current state of research on using large language models (LLMs) in mental health applications. The authors have highlighted both the potential benefits and the significant challenges associated with the clinical use of these models.

One of the key strengths of the review is the comprehensive approach, covering a range of applications, from early screening and detection of mental health issues to the use of LLMs in conversational agents and other clinical interventions. By considering a diverse set of studies, the review offers a well-rounded perspective on the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs in this domain.

However, the review also identifies several critical issues that warrant further investigation. The lack of high-quality, expert-annotated datasets is a significant limitation that could compromise the accuracy and reliability of LLM-based mental health tools. The interpretability challenges posed by the "black box" nature of these models are also a concern, as clinicians and patients may struggle to understand the reasoning behind the models' outputs.

Moreover, the ethical dilemmas highlighted in the review, such as data privacy and the potential for over-reliance on LLMs, are crucial considerations that must be addressed before these technologies can be widely adopted in clinical settings. The review rightly emphasizes the need for a clear ethical framework to guide the development and deployment of LLMs in mental health.

Future research in this area should aim to address these challenges, focusing on improving dataset quality, enhancing model interpretability, and establishing robust ethical guidelines. Collaborations between researchers, clinicians, and policymakers will be essential to ensure that the potential benefits of LLMs in mental health are realized in a responsible and ethical manner.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the current state of research on the use of large language models (LLMs) in mental health applications. The review highlights both the substantial effectiveness of LLMs in detecting mental health issues and providing accessible digital health services, as well as the significant concerns and limitations associated with their clinical use.

While the rapid development of LLMs underscores their potential as new clinical aids, the review identifies several critical challenges, including the lack of high-quality, expert-annotated datasets, concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the content generated, interpretability issues, and persistent ethical dilemmas. Addressing these challenges through continued research and collaboration between various stakeholders will be crucial to realizing the full potential of LLMs in mental health care while mitigating the risks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Model for Mental Health: A Systematic Review

Zhijun Guo, Alvina Lai, Johan Hilge Thygesen, Joseph Farrington, Thomas Keen, Kezhi Li

Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for potential applications in digital health, while their application in mental health is subject to ongoing debate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the usage of LLMs in mental health, focusing on their strengths and limitations in early screening, digital interventions, and clinical applications. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, JMIR, and ACM using keywords: 'mental health OR mental illness OR mental disorder OR psychiatry' AND 'large language models'. We included articles published between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2024, excluding non-English articles. 30 articles were evaluated, which included research on mental health conditions and suicidal ideation detection through text (n=15), usage of LLMs for mental health conversational agents (CAs) (n=7), and other applications and evaluations of LLMs in mental health (n=18). LLMs exhibit substantial effectiveness in detecting mental health issues and providing accessible, de-stigmatized eHealth services. However, the current risks associated with the clinical use might surpass their benefits. The study identifies several significant issues: the lack of multilingual datasets annotated by experts, concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the content generated, challenges in interpretability due to the 'black box' nature of LLMs, and persistent ethical dilemmas. These include the lack of a clear ethical framework, concerns about data privacy, and the potential for over-reliance on LLMs by both therapists and patients, which could compromise traditional medical practice. Despite these issues, the rapid development of LLMs underscores their potential as new clinical aids, emphasizing the need for continued research and development in this area.

Read more

8/14/2024

Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review
Total Score

0

Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review

Yining Hua, Fenglin Liu, Kailai Yang, Zehan Li, Hongbin Na, Yi-han Sheu, Peilin Zhou, Lauren V. Moran, Sophia Ananiadou, Andrew Beam, John Torous

The integration of large language models (LLMs) in mental health care is an emerging field. There is a need to systematically review the application outcomes and delineate the advantages and limitations in clinical settings. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of LLMs in mental health care, assessing their efficacy, challenges, and potential for future applications. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, arXiv, medRxiv, and PsyArXiv in November 2023. All forms of original research, peer-reviewed or not, published or disseminated between October 1, 2019, and December 2, 2023, are included without language restrictions if they used LLMs developed after T5 and directly addressed research questions in mental health care settings. From an initial pool of 313 articles, 34 met the inclusion criteria based on their relevance to LLM application in mental health care and the robustness of reported outcomes. Diverse applications of LLMs in mental health care are identified, including diagnosis, therapy, patient engagement enhancement, etc. Key challenges include data availability and reliability, nuanced handling of mental states, and effective evaluation methods. Despite successes in accuracy and accessibility improvement, gaps in clinical applicability and ethical considerations were evident, pointing to the need for robust data, standardized evaluations, and interdisciplinary collaboration. LLMs hold substantial promise for enhancing mental health care. For their full potential to be realized, emphasis must be placed on developing robust datasets, development and evaluation frameworks, ethical guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaborations to address current limitations.

Read more

8/22/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental health

Hannah R. Lawrence, Renee A. Schneider, Susan B. Rubin, Maja J. Mataric, Daniel J. McDuff, Megan Jones Bell

Global rates of mental health concerns are rising, and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental health care will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to mental health related tasks. In this paper, we summarize the extant literature on efforts to use LLMs to provide mental health education, assessment, and intervention and highlight key opportunities for positive impact in each area. We then highlight risks associated with LLMs' application to mental health and encourage the adoption of strategies to mitigate these risks. The urgent need for mental health support must be balanced with responsible development, testing, and deployment of mental health LLMs. It is especially critical to ensure that mental health LLMs are fine-tuned for mental health, enhance mental health equity, and adhere to ethical standards and that people, including those with lived experience with mental health concerns, are involved in all stages from development through deployment. Prioritizing these efforts will minimize potential harms to mental health and maximize the likelihood that LLMs will positively impact mental health globally.

Read more

8/2/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Applying and Evaluating Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: A Scoping Review of Human-Assessed Generative Tasks

Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Zehan Li, Fenglin Liu, Xiao Fang, David Clifton, John Torous

Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as promising tools for mental health care, offering scalable support through their ability to generate human-like responses. However, the effectiveness of these models in clinical settings remains unclear. This scoping review aimed to assess the current generative applications of LLMs in mental health care, focusing on studies where these models were tested with human participants in real-world scenarios. A systematic search across APA PsycNet, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science identified 726 unique articles, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. These studies encompassed applications such as clinical assistance, counseling, therapy, and emotional support. However, the evaluation methods were often non-standardized, with most studies relying on ad hoc scales that limit comparability and robustness. Privacy, safety, and fairness were also frequently underexplored. Moreover, reliance on proprietary models, such as OpenAI's GPT series, raises concerns about transparency and reproducibility. While LLMs show potential in expanding mental health care access, especially in underserved areas, the current evidence does not fully support their use as standalone interventions. More rigorous, standardized evaluations and ethical oversight are needed to ensure these tools can be safely and effectively integrated into clinical practice.

Read more

8/22/2024