A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications

Read original: arXiv:2409.04720 - Published 9/10/2024 by Junyu Gao, Mengyuan Chen, Liangyu Xiang, Changsheng Xu
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of Evidential Deep Learning (EDL), a field that combines deep learning with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence.
  • EDL aims to quantify and represent the uncertainty in deep learning models, going beyond the traditional softmax probabilities.
  • The paper covers the theoretical foundations of EDL, its practical applications, and the current state of research in this area.

Plain English Explanation

Evidential Deep Learning is a technique that aims to make deep learning models more transparent about their uncertainty. Traditional deep learning models often give a single, confident prediction, but in many real-world applications, it's important to know how sure the model is about its output.

EDL addresses this by using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, which allows the model to express its uncertainty in a more nuanced way. Instead of just giving a probability for each possible output, the model can say things like "I'm 70% sure it's this, 20% sure it's that, and 10% unsure." This extra information can be very useful, especially in high-stakes applications like medical diagnosis or self-driving cars.

The survey paper looks at the different ways researchers have applied EDL, such as to image classification, object detection, and dose prediction for radiation therapy. It also discusses the challenges and limitations of the approach, and suggests areas for future research.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides an overview of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, which forms the theoretical foundation for Evidential Deep Learning. This theory allows for the representation of uncertainty using "belief masses" assigned to different possible outcomes, rather than just probabilities.

The authors then describe how this evidence theory can be integrated into deep learning models. This involves modifying the output layer to produce a Dirichlet distribution, which represents the belief masses for each class. The model is then trained to optimize these belief masses, rather than just class probabilities.

The paper surveys a range of EDL applications, including image classification, object detection, and dose prediction for radiation therapy. It discusses the specific model architectures and training approaches used in each case, as well as the benefits that the extra uncertainty information provided by EDL brings.

Critical Analysis

The survey highlights some of the key challenges and limitations of Evidential Deep Learning that researchers are still grappling with. For example, the high computational cost of modeling the Dirichlet distributions, and the difficulty of interpreting the resulting belief masses.

The authors also note that most EDL research so far has focused on fairly narrow, well-defined tasks. Applying the approach to more complex, real-world problems with high-dimensional inputs and outputs is an area that requires further exploration.

Additionally, the paper acknowledges that there is still debate around the best way to integrate evidence theory with deep learning, and that alternative uncertainty quantification techniques, such as Bayesian deep learning, may also have a role to play.

Conclusion

This survey provides a thorough overview of the emerging field of Evidential Deep Learning. By combining deep learning with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, EDL offers a promising approach for building more transparent and uncertainty-aware AI systems.

The paper highlights the diverse range of applications where EDL has shown benefits, from medical diagnosis to autonomous driving. At the same time, it identifies key challenges that researchers need to address to further advance the state of the art.

Overall, the survey suggests that Evidential Deep Learning is a valuable tool for tackling real-world problems where quantifying and representing uncertainty is crucial. As the field continues to evolve, it may unlock new possibilities for reliable and trustworthy AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications

Junyu Gao, Mengyuan Chen, Liangyu Xiang, Changsheng Xu

Reliable uncertainty estimation has become a crucial requirement for the industrial deployment of deep learning algorithms, particularly in high-risk applications such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis. However, mainstream uncertainty estimation methods, based on deep ensembling or Bayesian neural networks, generally impose substantial computational overhead. To address this challenge, a novel paradigm called Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) has emerged, providing reliable uncertainty estimation with minimal additional computation in a single forward pass. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current research on EDL, designed to offer readers a broad introduction to the field without assuming prior knowledge. Specifically, we first delve into the theoretical foundation of EDL, the subjective logic theory, and discuss its distinctions from other uncertainty estimation frameworks. We further present existing theoretical advancements in EDL from four perspectives: reformulating the evidence collection process, improving uncertainty estimation via OOD samples, delving into various training strategies, and evidential regression networks. Thereafter, we elaborate on its extensive applications across various machine learning paradigms and downstream tasks. In the end, an outlook on future directions for better performances and broader adoption of EDL is provided, highlighting potential research avenues.

Read more

9/10/2024

Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?
Total Score

0

Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?

Maohao Shen, J. Jon Ryu, Soumya Ghosh, Yuheng Bu, Prasanna Sattigeri, Subhro Das, Gregory W. Wornell

This paper questions the effectiveness of a modern predictive uncertainty quantification approach, called emph{evidential deep learning} (EDL), in which a single neural network model is trained to learn a meta distribution over the predictive distribution by minimizing a specific objective function. Despite their perceived strong empirical performance on downstream tasks, a line of recent studies by Bengs et al. identify limitations of the existing methods to conclude their learned epistemic uncertainties are unreliable, e.g., in that they are non-vanishing even with infinite data. Building on and sharpening such analysis, we 1) provide a sharper understanding of the asymptotic behavior of a wide class of EDL methods by unifying various objective functions; 2) reveal that the EDL methods can be better interpreted as an out-of-distribution detection algorithm based on energy-based-models; and 3) conduct extensive ablation studies to better assess their empirical effectiveness with real-world datasets. Through all these analyses, we conclude that even when EDL methods are empirically effective on downstream tasks, this occurs despite their poor uncertainty quantification capabilities. Our investigation suggests that incorporating model uncertainty can help EDL methods faithfully quantify uncertainties and further improve performance on representative downstream tasks, albeit at the cost of additional computational complexity.

Read more

6/14/2024

Uncertainty Estimation by Density Aware Evidential Deep Learning
Total Score

0

Uncertainty Estimation by Density Aware Evidential Deep Learning

Taeseong Yoon, Heeyoung Kim

Evidential deep learning (EDL) has shown remarkable success in uncertainty estimation. However, there is still room for improvement, particularly in out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and classification tasks. The limited OOD detection performance of EDL arises from its inability to reflect the distance between the testing example and training data when quantifying uncertainty, while its limited classification performance stems from its parameterization of the concentration parameters. To address these limitations, we propose a novel method called Density Aware Evidential Deep Learning (DAEDL). DAEDL integrates the feature space density of the testing example with the output of EDL during the prediction stage, while using a novel parameterization that resolves the issues in the conventional parameterization. We prove that DAEDL enjoys a number of favorable theoretical properties. DAEDL demonstrates state-of-the-art performance across diverse downstream tasks related to uncertainty estimation and classification

Read more

9/16/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?

Mira Jurgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier, Willem Waegeman

Trustworthy ML systems should not only return accurate predictions, but also a reliable representation of their uncertainty. Bayesian methods are commonly used to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, but alternative approaches, such as evidential deep learning methods, have become popular in recent years. The latter group of methods in essence extends empirical risk minimization (ERM) for predicting second-order probability distributions over outcomes, from which measures of epistemic (and aleatoric) uncertainty can be extracted. This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning, highlighting the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions and interpreting the resulting epistemic uncertainty measures. With a systematic setup that covers a wide range of approaches for classification, regression and counts, it provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization, and the relative (rather than absolute) nature of epistemic uncertainty measures.

Read more

9/11/2024