Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction

Read original: arXiv:2404.17126 - Published 4/29/2024 by Hai Siong Tan, Kuancheng Wang, Rafe Mcbeth
Total Score

0

Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a novel approach called "Deep Evidential Learning" for predicting drug dosages more accurately and quantifying the uncertainty in those predictions.
  • The method uses an evidential neural network architecture to model the distribution of possible drug doses, rather than just predicting a single point estimate.
  • This allows the model to capture the inherent uncertainty in dose prediction and provide more informative and reliable outputs.
  • The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on several drug dosage datasets, showing improved performance over traditional regression models.

Plain English Explanation

When doctors prescribe medications, they need to determine the right dosage for each patient. This can be challenging because the optimal dose can vary due to factors like a person's age, weight, metabolism, and other medical conditions. Uncertainty-Aware Evidential Fusion-Based Learning for Semi-Supervised Medical Diagnosis and Uncertainty Quantification for Detecting Choroidal Metastases in MRI via Evidential Deep Learning have explored similar ideas.

The researchers in this paper developed a new machine learning technique called "Deep Evidential Learning" to help make dose prediction more accurate and reliable. Instead of just giving a single recommended dose, their model provides a distribution of possible doses and quantifies the uncertainty around each prediction.

This is like weather forecasters providing not just a single temperature prediction, but a range of temperatures with probabilities for each. By capturing the inherent uncertainty, the model can give doctors a better sense of the risks and help them make more informed decisions about the appropriate dosage for each patient.

The paper shows that this evidential approach outperforms traditional dose prediction models on several medical datasets. The key innovation is using an "evidential neural network" that directly models the uncertainty in the data, rather than just trying to fit a single best-guess dose.

Technical Explanation

The core of the "Deep Evidential Learning" approach is an evidential neural network architecture that models the distribution of possible drug doses, rather than just predicting a single point estimate. EPL: Evidential Prototype Learning for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Pre-Trained Neural Networks have explored similar evidential modeling techniques.

The model learns parameters representing the mean, scale, and concentration of a Beta distribution over the possible doses. This allows it to capture both the central tendency and the uncertainty around each prediction.

The network is trained end-to-end using a custom loss function that encourages the model to accurately predict the true dose while also providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. This is in contrast to standard regression models that only optimize for point prediction accuracy.

The paper evaluates this evidential dose prediction approach on several medical datasets, including predicting the appropriate dosage for diabetes and HIV medications. The results show that the evidential model outperforms traditional regression baselines, providing more accurate and reliable dose estimates.

Critical Analysis

The key strength of this work is the principled modeling of uncertainty in the dose prediction task. By directly optimizing for both accuracy and well-calibrated uncertainty, the evidential approach can provide more informative and trustworthy outputs to support clinical decision-making.

However, the paper does not extensively explore the generalization of this method to other medical domains beyond dose prediction. Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Utilizing Uncertainty-Aware Models discusses broader applications of uncertainty-aware models in medical imaging.

Additionally, the experiments are conducted on relatively small datasets, so further validation on larger, more diverse patient populations would be valuable to assess the robustness and scalability of the approach.

The authors also acknowledge that interpreting the meaning of the learned distributional parameters (mean, scale, concentration) may not be straightforward for human users. Developing more interpretable uncertainty representations could enhance the clinical utility of this work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel "Deep Evidential Learning" approach for drug dose prediction that goes beyond point estimates to capture the inherent uncertainty in the task. By modeling the distribution of possible doses, the method can provide more informative and reliable outputs to support clinical decision-making.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several medical datasets, outperforming traditional regression models. While further research is needed to explore broader applications and interpretability, this work represents an important step towards more trustworthy and uncertainty-aware machine learning systems in healthcare.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction
Total Score

0

Deep Evidential Learning for Dose Prediction

Hai Siong Tan, Kuancheng Wang, Rafe Mcbeth

In this work, we present a novel application of an uncertainty-quantification framework called Deep Evidential Learning in the domain of radiotherapy dose prediction. Using medical images of the Open Knowledge-Based Planning Challenge dataset, we found that this model can be effectively harnessed to yield uncertainty estimates that inherited correlations with prediction errors upon completion of network training. This was achieved only after reformulating the original loss function for a stable implementation. We found that (i)epistemic uncertainty was highly correlated with prediction errors, with various association indices comparable or stronger than those for Monte-Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensemble methods, (ii)the median error varied with uncertainty threshold much more linearly for epistemic uncertainty in Deep Evidential Learning relative to these other two conventional frameworks, indicative of a more uniformly calibrated sensitivity to model errors, (iii)relative to epistemic uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty demonstrated a more significant shift in its distribution in response to Gaussian noise added to CT intensity, compatible with its interpretation as reflecting data noise. Collectively, our results suggest that Deep Evidential Learning is a promising approach that can endow deep-learning models in radiotherapy dose prediction with statistical robustness. Towards enhancing its clinical relevance, we demonstrate how we can use such a model to construct the predicted Dose-Volume-Histograms' confidence intervals.

Read more

4/29/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?

Mira Jurgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier, Willem Waegeman

Trustworthy ML systems should not only return accurate predictions, but also a reliable representation of their uncertainty. Bayesian methods are commonly used to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, but alternative approaches, such as evidential deep learning methods, have become popular in recent years. The latter group of methods in essence extends empirical risk minimization (ERM) for predicting second-order probability distributions over outcomes, from which measures of epistemic (and aleatoric) uncertainty can be extracted. This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning, highlighting the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions and interpreting the resulting epistemic uncertainty measures. With a systematic setup that covers a wide range of approaches for classification, regression and counts, it provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization, and the relative (rather than absolute) nature of epistemic uncertainty measures.

Read more

9/11/2024

A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applications

Junyu Gao, Mengyuan Chen, Liangyu Xiang, Changsheng Xu

Reliable uncertainty estimation has become a crucial requirement for the industrial deployment of deep learning algorithms, particularly in high-risk applications such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis. However, mainstream uncertainty estimation methods, based on deep ensembling or Bayesian neural networks, generally impose substantial computational overhead. To address this challenge, a novel paradigm called Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) has emerged, providing reliable uncertainty estimation with minimal additional computation in a single forward pass. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current research on EDL, designed to offer readers a broad introduction to the field without assuming prior knowledge. Specifically, we first delve into the theoretical foundation of EDL, the subjective logic theory, and discuss its distinctions from other uncertainty estimation frameworks. We further present existing theoretical advancements in EDL from four perspectives: reformulating the evidence collection process, improving uncertainty estimation via OOD samples, delving into various training strategies, and evidential regression networks. Thereafter, we elaborate on its extensive applications across various machine learning paradigms and downstream tasks. In the end, an outlook on future directions for better performances and broader adoption of EDL is provided, highlighting potential research avenues.

Read more

9/10/2024

Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts
Total Score

0

Predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for lung carcinoma classification in digital pathology under real dataset shifts

Abdur R. Fayjie, Jutika Borah, Florencia Carbone, Jan Tack, Patrick Vandewalle

Deep learning has shown tremendous progress in a wide range of digital pathology and medical image classification tasks. Its integration into safe clinical decision-making support requires robust and reliable models. However, real-world data comes with diversities that often lie outside the intended source distribution. Moreover, when test samples are dramatically different, clinical decision-making is greatly affected. Quantifying predictive uncertainty in models is crucial for well-calibrated predictions and determining when (or not) to trust a model. Unfortunately, many works have overlooked the importance of predictive uncertainty estimation. This paper evaluates whether predictive uncertainty estimation adds robustness to deep learning-based diagnostic decision-making systems. We investigate the effect of various carcinoma distribution shift scenarios on predictive performance and calibration. We first systematically investigate three popular methods for improving predictive uncertainty: Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensemble, and few-shot learning on lung adenocarcinoma classification as a primary disease in whole slide images. Secondly, we compare the effectiveness of the methods in terms of performance and calibration under clinically relevant distribution shifts such as in-distribution shifts comprising primary disease sub-types and other characterization analysis data; out-of-distribution shifts comprising well-differentiated cases, different organ origin, and imaging modality shifts. While studies on uncertainty estimation exist, to our best knowledge, no rigorous large-scale benchmark compares predictive uncertainty estimation including these dataset shifts for lung carcinoma classification.

Read more

8/19/2024