Computational Approaches for Integrating out Subjectivity in Cognate Synonym Selection
0
Sign in to get full access
Materials and Methods
Subjectivity in Cognate Synonym Selection
The paper explores computational approaches to address the challenge of subjectivity in selecting synonyms for cognates - words that have similar meanings across languages. Subjectivity arises because synonym selection often relies on human judgement, which can vary based on personal biases and interpretations.
Overcoming Subjectivity
The researchers propose methods to reduce the influence of subjectivity and provide more objective approaches for cognate synonym selection. This involves incorporating linguistic knowledge and leveraging large language models to infer semantic relationships between words.
The paper investigates several techniques, including how lexical is bilingual lexicon induction, incorporating lexical-syntactic knowledge in unsupervised cross-lingual, and inferring phylogeny from large language models to predict semantic relationships.
Experimental Design
The researchers designed experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of their approaches in reducing subjectivity and improving cognate synonym selection. This included assessing the performance of their methods on benchmark datasets and comparing the results to existing approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem in language processing called "cognate synonym selection." Cognates are words that have similar meanings across different languages, like "dog" in English and "perro" in Spanish.
Selecting the best synonyms for cognates can be tricky because it often relies on human judgment, which can be subjective. People may have different opinions on which words are the best synonyms.
The researchers in this paper propose computational methods to make the process of selecting cognate synonyms more objective and less influenced by subjectivity. They do this by incorporating linguistic knowledge and using large language models to better understand the relationships between words.
The paper explores various techniques, like how lexical information is used in bilingual lexicon induction, using lexical and syntactic knowledge for unsupervised cross-lingual tasks, and inferring the evolutionary relationships between languages from large language models.
The researchers designed experiments to test the effectiveness of their approaches in reducing subjectivity and improving cognate synonym selection, comparing their methods to existing techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents computational approaches to address the challenge of subjectivity in cognate synonym selection. Cognate synonyms are words that have similar meanings across languages, but selecting the best synonyms can be subjective due to individual biases and interpretations.
The researchers propose methods to reduce the influence of subjectivity and provide more objective approaches for cognate synonym selection. They investigate techniques such as how lexical information is used in bilingual lexicon induction, incorporating lexical-syntactic knowledge in unsupervised cross-lingual tasks, and inferring phylogeny from large language models to predict semantic relationships.
The experimental design involves evaluating the performance of their proposed methods on benchmark datasets and comparing the results to existing approaches. This allows the researchers to assess the effectiveness of their techniques in reducing subjectivity and improving cognate synonym selection.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to addressing the subjectivity inherent in cognate synonym selection. By incorporating linguistic knowledge and leveraging large language models, the researchers aim to develop more objective and systematic methods for this task.
One potential limitation is the reliance on benchmark datasets, which may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world language usage. Additional evaluation on diverse, realistic datasets could provide further insights into the generalizability and practical implications of the proposed methods.
Furthermore, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential biases and limitations of the large language models used in their techniques. As these models are known to exhibit biases, it would be valuable to explore how the researchers mitigate these issues and ensure the objectivity of their approaches.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for improving cognate synonym selection, but additional research and critical analysis could further strengthen the validity and practical applications of the proposed computational approaches.
Conclusion
This paper explores computational methods to address the subjectivity inherent in cognate synonym selection. By incorporating linguistic knowledge and leveraging large language models, the researchers aim to develop more objective and systematic approaches for this task.
The experiments demonstrate the potential of their techniques in reducing the influence of subjectivity and improving the selection of cognate synonyms. However, the paper also highlights the need for further investigation into the generalizability and potential biases of the proposed methods.
The findings of this research contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance language processing and make it more robust and reliable, with potential applications in various fields, such as neural semantic parsing and measuring linguistic diversity in multilingual NLP. As the field continues to evolve, this paper provides a valuable perspective on addressing subjectivity in cognate synonym selection.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Computational Approaches for Integrating out Subjectivity in Cognate Synonym Selection
Luise Hauser, Gerhard Jager, Alexandros Stamatakis
Working with cognate data involves handling synonyms, that is, multiple words that describe the same concept in a language. In the early days of language phylogenetics it was recommended to select one synonym only. However, as we show here, binary character matrices, which are used as input for computational methods, do allow for representing the entire dataset including all synonyms. Here we address the question how one can and if one should include all synonyms or whether it is preferable to select synonyms a priori. To this end, we perform maximum likelihood tree inferences with the widely used RAxML-NG tool and show that it yields plausible trees when all synonyms are used as input. Furthermore, we show that a priori synonym selection can yield topologically substantially different trees and we therefore advise against doing so. To represent cognate data including all synonyms, we introduce two types of character matrices beyond the standard binary ones: probabilistic binary and probabilistic multi-valued character matrices. We further show that it is dataset-dependent for which character matrix type the inferred RAxML-NG tree is topologically closest to the gold standard. We also make available a Python interface for generating all of the above character matrix types for cognate data provided in CLDF format.
Read more6/6/2024
📈
0
Are Sounds Sound for Phylogenetic Reconstruction?
Luise Hauser, Gerhard Jager, Taraka Rama, Johann-Mattis List, Alexandros Stamatakis
In traditional studies on language evolution, scholars often emphasize the importance of sound laws and sound correspondences for phylogenetic inference of language family trees. However, to date, computational approaches have typically not taken this potential into account. Most computational studies still rely on lexical cognates as major data source for phylogenetic reconstruction in linguistics, although there do exist a few studies in which authors praise the benefits of comparing words at the level of sound sequences. Building on (a) ten diverse datasets from different language families, and (b) state-of-the-art methods for automated cognate and sound correspondence detection, we test, for the first time, the performance of sound-based versus cognate-based approaches to phylogenetic reconstruction. Our results show that phylogenies reconstructed from lexical cognates are topologically closer, by approximately one third with respect to the generalized quartet distance on average, to the gold standard phylogenies than phylogenies reconstructed from sound correspondences.
Read more5/15/2024
✨
0
Generating Feature Vectors from Phonetic Transcriptions in Cross-Linguistic Data Formats
Arne Rubehn, Jessica Nieder, Robert Forkel, Johann-Mattis List
When comparing speech sounds across languages, scholars often make use of feature representations of individual sounds in order to determine fine-grained sound similarities. Although binary feature systems for large numbers of speech sounds have been proposed, large-scale computational applications often face the challenges that the proposed feature systems -- even if they list features for several thousand sounds -- only cover a smaller part of the numerous speech sounds reflected in actual cross-linguistic data. In order to address the problem of missing data for attested speech sounds, we propose a new approach that can create binary feature vectors dynamically for all sounds that can be represented in the the standardized version of the International Phonetic Alphabet proposed by the Cross-Linguistic Transcription Systems (CLTS) reference catalog. Since CLTS is actively used in large data collections, covering more than 2,000 distinct language varieties, our procedure for the generation of binary feature vectors provides immediate access to a very large collection of multilingual wordlists. Testing our feature system in different ways on different datasets proves that the system is not only useful to provide a straightforward means to compare the similarity of speech sounds, but also illustrates its potential to be used in future cross-linguistic machine learning applications.
Read more5/8/2024
0
Reliable Node Similarity Matrix Guided Contrastive Graph Clustering
Yunhui Liu, Xinyi Gao, Tieke He, Tao Zheng, Jianhua Zhao, Hongzhi Yin
Graph clustering, which involves the partitioning of nodes within a graph into disjoint clusters, holds significant importance for numerous subsequent applications. Recently, contrastive learning, known for utilizing supervisory information, has demonstrated encouraging results in deep graph clustering. This methodology facilitates the learning of favorable node representations for clustering by attracting positively correlated node pairs and distancing negatively correlated pairs within the representation space. Nevertheless, a significant limitation of existing methods is their inadequacy in thoroughly exploring node-wise similarity. For instance, some hypothesize that the node similarity matrix within the representation space is identical, ignoring the inherent semantic relationships among nodes. Given the fundamental role of instance similarity in clustering, our research investigates contrastive graph clustering from the perspective of the node similarity matrix. We argue that an ideal node similarity matrix within the representation space should accurately reflect the inherent semantic relationships among nodes, ensuring the preservation of semantic similarities in the learned representations. In response to this, we introduce a new framework, Reliable Node Similarity Matrix Guided Contrastive Graph Clustering (NS4GC), which estimates an approximately ideal node similarity matrix within the representation space to guide representation learning. Our method introduces node-neighbor alignment and semantic-aware sparsification, ensuring the node similarity matrix is both accurate and efficiently sparse. Comprehensive experiments conducted on $8$ real-world datasets affirm the efficacy of learning the node similarity matrix and the superior performance of NS4GC.
Read more8/9/2024