A Measure for Transparent Comparison of Linguistic Diversity in Multilingual NLP Data Sets
2403.03909
0
0
Abstract
Typologically diverse benchmarks are increasingly created to track the progress achieved in multilingual NLP. Linguistic diversity of these data sets is typically measured as the number of languages or language families included in the sample, but such measures do not consider structural properties of the included languages. In this paper, we propose assessing linguistic diversity of a data set against a reference language sample as a means of maximising linguistic diversity in the long run. We represent languages as sets of features and apply a version of the Jaccard index suitable for comparing sets of measures. In addition to the features extracted from typological data bases, we propose an automatic text-based measure, which can be used as a means of overcoming the well-known problem of data sparsity in manually collected features. Our diversity score is interpretable in terms of linguistic features and can identify the types of languages that are not represented in a data set. Using our method, we analyse a range of popular multilingual data sets (UD, Bible100, mBERT, XTREME, XGLUE, XNLI, XCOPA, TyDiQA, XQuAD). In addition to ranking these data sets, we find, for example, that (poly)synthetic languages are missing in almost all of them.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a measure called Jaccard Similarity to quantify and compare the linguistic diversity of multilingual NLP datasets.
- It demonstrates the usefulness of this measure by analyzing and comparing the linguistic diversity of several popular multilingual datasets.
- The paper highlights how this measure can be used to better understand the strengths and limitations of these datasets, which is important for tasks like cross-lingual transfer learning.
Plain English Explanation
When you're working with language data from around the world, it's important to understand how diverse that data is. This paper proposes a way to measure the linguistic diversity of multilingual datasets used in natural language processing (NLP) research and applications.
The key idea is to use something called Jaccard Similarity. Jaccard Similarity is a way to compare the overlap between two sets of things. In this case, the "things" are the unique words or tokens that appear in the text data. By calculating the Jaccard Similarity between the word sets of different languages in a dataset, you can get a sense of how similar or different those languages are represented.
For example, if a dataset contains text in English, French, and Hindi, the authors would calculate the Jaccard Similarity between the English and French word sets, the English and Hindi word sets, and the French and Hindi word sets. This gives you a quantitative measure of the linguistic diversity - the more different the word sets are, the more diverse the dataset is.
The authors show how this Jaccard Similarity metric can be used to analyze and compare the linguistic diversity of several popular multilingual NLP datasets. This is important because the diversity of the training data can significantly impact the performance of NLP models, especially when it comes to tasks like translating between languages or understanding different dialects.
By having a transparent way to measure and compare the linguistic diversity of datasets, researchers and practitioners can make more informed decisions about which datasets to use for their specific NLP tasks and applications. This helps ensure that the models they develop are able to handle the linguistic diversity of the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a method to quantify and compare the linguistic diversity of multilingual NLP datasets using Jaccard Similarity. Jaccard Similarity is a well-established metric that measures the overlap between two sets. In the context of this work, the authors apply Jaccard Similarity to the sets of unique words or tokens present in the text data for different languages within a dataset.
Specifically, the authors calculate the Jaccard Similarity between the word sets of every pair of languages in a given dataset. This results in a matrix of Jaccard Similarity values that captures the linguistic diversity of the dataset. A dataset with high linguistic diversity will have low Jaccard Similarity values between many language pairs, indicating that the languages are quite different in their lexical composition.
The authors demonstrate the usefulness of this Jaccard Similarity-based measure by analyzing the linguistic diversity of several popular multilingual NLP datasets, including XNLI, PAWS-X, and mC4. Their analysis reveals interesting insights about the strengths and limitations of these datasets in terms of linguistic diversity, which is crucial for understanding their suitability for tasks like cross-lingual transfer learning.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a straightforward and intuitive approach to quantifying linguistic diversity in multilingual datasets using Jaccard Similarity. This metric provides a transparent way to compare the diversity of different datasets, which is an important consideration for many NLP applications.
One limitation of the approach is that it only captures lexical diversity, not deeper linguistic differences such as grammatical structures, idioms, or regional variations. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore additional measures to capture these other aspects of linguistic diversity.
Additionally, the analysis in the paper is primarily descriptive, focusing on how to compute and interpret the Jaccard Similarity metric. While the authors demonstrate the usefulness of this measure, they do not delve deeply into the implications for model performance or provide guidance on how to use the metric to inform dataset selection or curation.
Further research could explore the relationship between the Jaccard Similarity-based linguistic diversity measure and the actual performance of NLP models on cross-lingual tasks. This would help validate the practical relevance of the proposed metric and provide more actionable insights for researchers and practitioners.
Conclusion
This paper presents a simple yet effective way to quantify and compare the linguistic diversity of multilingual NLP datasets using Jaccard Similarity. By providing a transparent and interpretable measure of diversity, the authors enable researchers and practitioners to better understand the strengths and limitations of popular multilingual datasets.
This is an important contribution, as the linguistic diversity of training data can have a significant impact on the performance of NLP models, especially in cross-lingual settings. The Jaccard Similarity-based measure introduced in this paper can help inform dataset selection and curation, ultimately leading to more robust and inclusive NLP systems that can handle the rich linguistic diversity of the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
What is Typological Diversity in NLP?
Esther Ploeger, Wessel Poelman, Miryam de Lhoneux, Johannes Bjerva
0
0
The NLP research community has devoted increased attention to languages beyond English, resulting in considerable improvements for multilingual NLP. However, these improvements only apply to a small subset of the world's languages. Aiming to extend this, an increasing number of papers aspires to enhance generalizable multilingual performance across languages. To this end, linguistic typology is commonly used to motivate language selection, on the basis that a broad typological sample ought to imply generalization across a broad range of languages. These selections are often described as being 'typologically diverse'. In this work, we systematically investigate NLP research that includes claims regarding 'typological diversity'. We find there are no set definitions or criteria for such claims. We introduce metrics to approximate the diversity of language selection along several axes and find that the results vary considerably across papers. Crucially, we show that skewed language selection can lead to overestimated multilingual performance. We recommend future work to include an operationalization of 'typological diversity' that empirically justifies the diversity of language samples.
6/18/2024
📉
No Filter: Cultural and Socioeconomic Diversityin Contrastive Vision-Language Models
Ang'eline Pouget, Lucas Beyer, Emanuele Bugliarello, Xiao Wang, Andreas Peter Steiner, Xiaohua Zhai, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin
0
0
We study cultural and socioeconomic diversity in contrastive vision-language models (VLMs). Using a broad range of benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, we bring to attention several important findings. First, the common filtering of training data to English image-text pairs disadvantages communities of lower socioeconomic status and negatively impacts cultural understanding. Notably, this performance gap is not captured by - and even at odds with - the currently popular evaluation metrics derived from the Western-centric ImageNet and COCO datasets. Second, pretraining with global, unfiltered data before fine-tuning on English content can improve cultural understanding without sacrificing performance on said popular benchmarks. Third, we introduce the task of geo-localization as a novel evaluation metric to assess cultural diversity in VLMs. Our work underscores the value of using diverse data to create more inclusive multimodal systems and lays the groundwork for developing VLMs that better represent global perspectives.
5/27/2024
Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages
Zihao Li, Yucheng Shi, Zirui Liu, Fan Yang, Ali Payani, Ninghao Liu, Mengnan Du
0
0
The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) relies on extensive text corpora, which are often unevenly distributed across languages. This imbalance results in LLMs performing significantly better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. Currently, there is a lack of quantitative methods to evaluate the performance of LLMs in these low-resource languages. To address this gap, we propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. By comparing the LLM's internal representation of various languages against a baseline derived from English, we can assess the model's multilingual capabilities in a robust and language-agnostic manner. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores, underscoring the effectiveness of our metric in assessing language-specific capabilities. Besides, the experiments show that there is a strong correlation between the LLM's performance in different languages and the proportion of those languages in its pre-training corpus. These insights underscore the efficacy of the Language Ranker as a tool for evaluating LLM performance across different languages, particularly those with limited resources.
6/18/2024
💬
Evaluating and Mitigating Linguistic Discrimination in Large Language Models
Guoliang Dong, Haoyu Wang, Jun Sun, Xinyu Wang
0
0
By training on text in various languages, large language models (LLMs) typically possess multilingual support and demonstrate remarkable capabilities in solving tasks described in different languages. However, LLMs can exhibit linguistic discrimination due to the uneven distribution of training data across languages. That is, LLMs are hard to keep the consistency of responses when faced with the same task but depicted in different languages. In this study, we first explore the consistency in the LLMs' outputs responding to queries in various languages from two aspects: safety and quality. We conduct this analysis with two datasets (AdvBench and NQ) based on four LLMs (Llama2-13b, Gemma-7b, GPT-3.5-turbo and Gemini-pro). The results show that LLMs exhibit stronger human alignment capabilities with queries in English, French, Russian, and Spanish (only 1.04% of harmful queries successfully jailbreak on average) compared to queries in Bengali, Georgian, Nepali and Maithili (27.7% of harmful queries jailbreak successfully on average). Moreover, for queries in English, Danish, Czech and Slovenian, LLMs tend to produce responses with a higher quality (with 0.1494 $F_1$ score on average) compared to the other languages. Upon these findings, we propose LDFighter, a similarity-based voting, to mitigate the linguistic discrimination in LLMs. LDFighter ensures consistent service for different language speakers. We evaluate LDFighter with both benign queries and harmful queries. The results show that LDFighter not only significantly reduces the jailbreak success rate but also improve the response quality on average, demonstrating its effectiveness.
5/13/2024