Computational-Statistical Trade-off in Kernel Two-Sample Testing with Random Fourier Features

Read original: arXiv:2407.08976 - Published 7/15/2024 by Ikjun Choi, Ilmun Kim
Total Score

0

๐Ÿงช

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Recent years have seen a surge in methods for two-sample testing, with the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) test emerging as an effective tool for handling complex and high-dimensional data.
  • The primary limitation of the MMD test has been its quadratic-time complexity, which poses challenges for large-scale analysis.
  • Various approaches have been proposed to expedite the MMD procedure, but it has been unclear whether they can attain the same power guarantee as the original MMD test at sub-quadratic time cost.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores an approximation of the MMD test using random Fourier features, which can potentially reduce the computational cost of the test while maintaining its statistical power.

The MMD test is a popular method for comparing two sets of data, particularly when the data is complex or high-dimensional. However, the original MMD test is computationally expensive, taking a quadratic amount of time to run. This makes it challenging to use the MMD test on large datasets.

To address this issue, the researchers investigated an approximation of the MMD test that uses random Fourier features. This approximation can be computed more quickly, in sub-quadratic time. The key question is whether this approximation can still achieve the same statistical power as the original MMD test.

The paper's main findings are:

  1. The approximated MMD test is only
    pointwise consistent
    in power (meaning it has the correct power guarantee only at a single point) when the number of random features approaches infinity.
  2. However, by carefully choosing the number of random features, the approximated MMD test can achieve the
    same minimax separation rates
    (the best possible power guarantee) as the original MMD test, within sub-quadratic time.

These theoretical results are supported by simulation studies, demonstrating the practical viability of the approximated MMD test.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the computational-statistical trade-off of the approximated MMD test using random Fourier features. The researchers start by revealing that the approximated MMD test is

pointwise consistent
in power only when the number of random features approaches infinity. This means that the test has the correct power guarantee at a single point, but not uniformly across different alternatives.

To address this limitation, the authors consider the

uniform power
of the test and study the time-power trade-off under the
minimax testing framework
. Their key result shows that, by carefully choosing the number of random features, it is possible to attain the same
minimax separation rates
as the original MMD test within sub-quadratic time.

This finding is demonstrated under different distributional assumptions, such as when the underlying densities belong to a

Sobolev ball
. The theoretical analysis is supported by simulation studies, which corroborate the researchers' findings.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the approximated MMD test, addressing an important limitation of the original MMD test โ€“ its quadratic-time complexity. The authors' careful analysis of the computational-statistical trade-off is a valuable contribution to the field of two-sample testing.

One potential area for further research is the practical implementation and tuning of the approximated MMD test. While the theoretical guarantees are established, the paper does not delve into the specifics of how to choose the optimal number of random features in real-world applications. Providing guidance or heuristics for this parameter selection could further enhance the usability of the approximated MMD test.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the

minimax testing framework
, which provides a robust power guarantee. It would be interesting to explore how the approximated MMD test performs under other testing frameworks, such as robust kernel hypothesis testing or debiased distribution compression, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents an important advancement in the field of two-sample testing by investigating an approximated version of the MMD test that can be computed in sub-quadratic time. The researchers' theoretical analysis and simulation results demonstrate that the approximated MMD test can achieve the same statistical power guarantee as the original MMD test, while significantly reducing the computational cost.

This work has the potential to make the MMD test more accessible and practical for large-scale data analysis tasks, where the quadratic-time complexity of the original MMD test would be prohibitive. The insights provided in this paper can also inform the development of other efficient statistical tests for complex and high-dimensional data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Computational-Statistical Trade-off in Kernel Two-Sample Testing with Random Fourier Features

Ikjun Choi, Ilmun Kim

Recent years have seen a surge in methods for two-sample testing, among which the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) test has emerged as an effective tool for handling complex and high-dimensional data. Despite its success and widespread adoption, the primary limitation of the MMD test has been its quadratic-time complexity, which poses challenges for large-scale analysis. While various approaches have been proposed to expedite the procedure, it has been unclear whether it is possible to attain the same power guarantee as the MMD test at sub-quadratic time cost. To fill this gap, we revisit the approximated MMD test using random Fourier features, and investigate its computational-statistical trade-off. We start by revealing that the approximated MMD test is pointwise consistent in power only when the number of random features approaches infinity. We then consider the uniform power of the test and study the time-power trade-off under the minimax testing framework. Our result shows that, by carefully choosing the number of random features, it is possible to attain the same minimax separation rates as the MMD test within sub-quadratic time. We demonstrate this point under different distributional assumptions such as densities in a Sobolev ball. Our theoretical findings are corroborated by simulation studies.

Read more

7/15/2024

โž–

Total Score

0

Spectral Regularized Kernel Two-Sample Tests

Omar Hagrass, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Bing Li

Over the last decade, an approach that has gained a lot of popularity to tackle nonparametric testing problems on general (i.e., non-Euclidean) domains is based on the notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) embedding of probability distributions. The main goal of our work is to understand the optimality of two-sample tests constructed based on this approach. First, we show the popular MMD (maximum mean discrepancy) two-sample test to be not optimal in terms of the separation boundary measured in Hellinger distance. Second, we propose a modification to the MMD test based on spectral regularization by taking into account the covariance information (which is not captured by the MMD test) and prove the proposed test to be minimax optimal with a smaller separation boundary than that achieved by the MMD test. Third, we propose an adaptive version of the above test which involves a data-driven strategy to choose the regularization parameter and show the adaptive test to be almost minimax optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, our results hold for the permutation variant of the test where the test threshold is chosen elegantly through the permutation of the samples. Through numerical experiments on synthetic and real data, we demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed test in comparison to the MMD test and other popular tests in the literature.

Read more

5/3/2024

๐Ÿ“‰

Total Score

0

A Concentration Inequality for Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD)-based Statistics and Its Application in Generative Models

Yijin Ni, Xiaoming Huo

Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) is a probability metric that has found numerous applications in machine learning. In this work, we focus on its application in generative models, including the minimum MMD estimator, Generative Moment Matching Network (GMMN), and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). In these cases, MMD is part of an objective function in a minimization or min-max optimization problem. Even if its empirical performance is competitive, the consistency and convergence rate analysis of the corresponding MMD-based estimators has yet to be carried out. We propose a uniform concentration inequality for a class of Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD)-based estimators, that is, a maximum deviation bound of empirical MMD values over a collection of generated distributions and adversarially learned kernels. Here, our inequality serves as an efficient tool in the theoretical analysis for MMD-based generative models. As elaborating examples, we applied our main result to provide the generalization error bounds for the MMD-based estimators in the context of the minimum MMD estimator and MMD GAN.

Read more

5/24/2024

๐Ÿ”Ž

Total Score

0

New!Maximum Mean Discrepancy on Exponential Windows for Online Change Detection

Florian Kalinke, Marco Heyden, Georg Gntuni, Edouard Fouch'e, Klemens Bohm

Detecting changes is of fundamental importance when analyzing data streams and has many applications, e.g., in predictive maintenance, fraud detection, or medicine. A principled approach to detect changes is to compare the distributions of observations within the stream to each other via hypothesis testing. Maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), a (semi-)metric on the space of probability distributions, provides powerful non-parametric two-sample tests on kernel-enriched domains. In particular, MMD is able to detect any disparity between distributions under mild conditions. However, classical MMD estimators suffer from a quadratic runtime complexity, which renders their direct use for change detection in data streams impractical. In this article, we propose a new change detection algorithm, called Maximum Mean Discrepancy on Exponential Windows (MMDEW), that combines the benefits of MMD with an efficient computation based on exponential windows. We prove that MMDEW enjoys polylogarithmic runtime and logarithmic memory complexity and show empirically that it outperforms the state of the art on benchmark data streams.

Read more

9/17/2024