Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noise

Read original: arXiv:2303.15740 - Published 9/18/2024 by Zaiwei Chen, Siva Theja Maguluri, Martin Zubeldia
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper establishes bounds on the concentration of iterates produced by a stochastic approximation (SA) algorithm under a contractive operator.
  • Two settings are considered: SA with bounded multiplicative noise and SA with sub-Gaussian additive noise.
  • The results show that the convergence error has a sub-Gaussian tail in the additive noise setting and a Weibull tail in the multiplicative noise setting.
  • An impossibility result is provided, showing that sub-exponential tails are generally impossible under multiplicative noise.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines a type of optimization algorithm called stochastic approximation (SA). SA algorithms are used to solve optimization problems when the objective function is not known exactly, but can only be estimated through noisy measurements or simulations. This is common in many real-world applications, such as reinforcement learning and signal processing.

The researchers looked at two specific settings for SA algorithms:

  1. Bounded multiplicative noise: The noisy measurements or simulations have a multiplicative noise component, but the noise is bounded.
  2. Sub-Gaussian additive noise: The noisy measurements or simulations have an additive noise component that follows a sub-Gaussian distribution (a type of distribution that decays faster than the normal distribution).

The key question the paper addresses is: How quickly do the iterates (the step-by-step values produced by the algorithm) converge to the optimal solution, and how tightly can we bound the error between the iterates and the optimal solution?

The main results show that:

  • In the additive noise setting, the convergence error has a sub-Gaussian tail, meaning it decays exponentially fast.
  • In the multiplicative noise setting, the convergence error has a Weibull tail, which decays faster than a polynomial but slower than an exponential.
  • Furthermore, the researchers proved that it is generally impossible to get a sub-exponential tail (which would be even faster than Weibull) in the multiplicative noise setting.

These theoretical results provide important insights into the fundamental limits of stochastic optimization algorithms and can help guide the design of more effective algorithms for real-world problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the behavior of a stochastic approximation (SA) algorithm under a contractive operator, which means the operator shrinks the distance between any two points. The researchers derive maximal concentration bounds on the iterates produced by the SA algorithm, meaning they provide tight bounds on how far the iterates can deviate from the optimal solution.

Two specific settings are considered:

  1. SA with bounded multiplicative noise: Here, the noisy measurements or simulations used by the SA algorithm have a multiplicative noise component, but the noise is bounded. The researchers show that the convergence error (the difference between the iterates and the optimal solution) has a Weibull tail, which decays faster than a polynomial but slower than an exponential.

  2. SA with sub-Gaussian additive noise: In this setting, the noisy measurements or simulations have an additive noise component that follows a sub-Gaussian distribution. The researchers prove that the convergence error has a sub-Gaussian tail, meaning it decays exponentially fast.

To establish these maximal concentration bounds, the researchers develop a novel bootstrapping argument. This involves bounding the moment-generating function of a modified version of the generalized Moreau envelope of the convergence error and then constructing an exponential supermartingale to enable using Ville's maximal inequality.

The researchers also provide an impossibility result, showing that it is generally impossible to have sub-exponential tails (which would be even faster than Weibull) under multiplicative noise.

The paper demonstrates the applicability of these theoretical results in the context of linear SA and reinforcement learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of stochastic approximation algorithms under different noise settings. The results offer important insights into the fundamental limits of these algorithms and can help guide the design of more effective optimization methods for real-world problems.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on a specific class of contractive operators, which may not capture the full range of operators encountered in practice. Additionally, the results are established for a generic norm, which may not always align with the specific performance metrics relevant to a given application.

Further research could explore relaxing the assumptions on the operator or considering alternative performance measures. It would also be valuable to investigate the implications of these theoretical results for the practical performance of stochastic optimization algorithms in various domains, such as machine learning and signal processing.

Conclusion

This paper establishes novel maximal concentration bounds for the iterates generated by a stochastic approximation algorithm under a contractive operator. The results show that the convergence error has a sub-Gaussian tail in the additive noise setting and a Weibull tail in the multiplicative noise setting, with an impossibility result indicating the general inability to achieve sub-exponential tails under multiplicative noise.

These theoretical insights can inform the design of more effective stochastic optimization algorithms for a wide range of applications, from reinforcement learning to signal processing. By understanding the fundamental limits of these algorithms, researchers and practitioners can develop more robust and efficient solutions to complex optimization problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noise

Zaiwei Chen, Siva Theja Maguluri, Martin Zubeldia

In this paper, we establish maximal concentration bounds for the iterates generated by a stochastic approximation (SA) algorithm under a contractive operator with respect to some arbitrary norm (for example, the $ell_infty$-norm). We consider two settings where the iterates are potentially unbounded: SA with bounded multiplicative noise and SA with sub-Gaussian additive noise. Our maximal concentration inequalities state that the convergence error has a sub-Gaussian tail in the additive noise setting and a Weibull tail (which is faster than polynomial decay but could be slower than exponential decay) in the multiplicative noise setting. In addition, we provide an impossibility result showing that it is generally impossible to have sub-exponential tails under multiplicative noise. To establish the maximal concentration bounds, we develop a novel bootstrapping argument that involves bounding the moment-generating function of a modified version of the generalized Moreau envelope of the convergence error and constructing an exponential supermartingale to enable using Ville's maximal inequality. We demonstrate the applicability of our theoretical results in the context of linear SA and reinforcement learning.

Read more

9/18/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Prelimit Coupling and Steady-State Convergence of Constant-stepsize Nonsmooth Contractive SA

Yixuan Zhang, Dongyan Huo, Yudong Chen, Qiaomin Xie

Motivated by Q-learning, we study nonsmooth contractive stochastic approximation (SA) with constant stepsize. We focus on two important classes of dynamics: 1) nonsmooth contractive SA with additive noise, and 2) synchronous and asynchronous Q-learning, which features both additive and multiplicative noise. For both dynamics, we establish weak convergence of the iterates to a stationary limit distribution in Wasserstein distance. Furthermore, we propose a prelimit coupling technique for establishing steady-state convergence and characterize the limit of the stationary distribution as the stepsize goes to zero. Using this result, we derive that the asymptotic bias of nonsmooth SA is proportional to the square root of the stepsize, which stands in sharp contrast to smooth SA. This bias characterization allows for the use of Richardson-Romberg extrapolation for bias reduction in nonsmooth SA.

Read more

4/10/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Convergence Rates for Stochastic Approximation: Biased Noise with Unbounded Variance, and Applications

Rajeeva L. Karandikar, M. Vidyasagar

In this paper, we study the convergence properties of the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) method for finding a stationary point of a given objective function $J(cdot)$. The objective function is not required to be convex. Rather, our results apply to a class of ``invex'' functions, which have the property that every stationary point is also a global minimizer. First, it is assumed that $J(cdot)$ satisfies a property that is slightly weaker than the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz (KL) condition, denoted here as (KL'). It is shown that the iterations $J(boldsymbol{theta}_t)$ converge almost surely to the global minimum of $J(cdot)$. Next, the hypothesis on $J(cdot)$ is strengthened from (KL') to the Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) condition. With this stronger hypothesis, we derive estimates on the rate of convergence of $J(boldsymbol{theta}_t)$ to its limit. Using these results, we show that for functions satisfying the PL property, the convergence rate of both the objective function and the norm of the gradient with SGD is the same as the best-possible rate for convex functions. While some results along these lines have been published in the past, our contributions contain two distinct improvements. First, the assumptions on the stochastic gradient are more general than elsewhere, and second, our convergence is almost sure, and not in expectation. We also study SGD when only function evaluations are permitted. In this setting, we determine the ``optimal'' increments or the size of the perturbations. Using the same set of ideas, we establish the global convergence of the Stochastic Approximation (SA) algorithm under more general assumptions on the measurement error, compared to the existing literature. We also derive bounds on the rate of convergence of the SA algorithm under appropriate assumptions.

Read more

9/24/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Tradeoffs between convergence rate and noise amplification for momentum-based accelerated optimization algorithms

Hesameddin Mohammadi, Meisam Razaviyayn, Mihailo R. Jovanovi'c

We study momentum-based first-order optimization algorithms in which the iterations utilize information from the two previous steps and are subject to an additive white noise. This setup uses noise to account for uncertainty in either gradient evaluation or iteration updates, and it includes Polyak's heavy-ball and Nesterov's accelerated methods as special cases. For strongly convex quadratic problems, we use the steady-state variance of the error in the optimization variable to quantify noise amplification and identify fundamental stochastic performance tradeoffs. Our approach utilizes the Jury stability criterion to provide a novel geometric characterization of conditions for linear convergence, and it reveals the relation between the noise amplification and convergence rate as well as their dependence on the condition number and the constant algorithmic parameters. This geometric insight leads to simple alternative proofs of standard convergence results and allows us to establish ``uncertainty principle'' of strongly convex optimization: for the two-step momentum method with linear convergence rate, the lower bound on the product between the settling time and noise amplification scales quadratically with the condition number. Our analysis also identifies a key difference between the gradient and iterate noise models: while the amplification of gradient noise can be made arbitrarily small by sufficiently decelerating the algorithm, the best achievable variance for the iterate noise model increases linearly with the settling time in the decelerating regime. Finally, we introduce two parameterized families of algorithms that strike a balance between noise amplification and settling time while preserving order-wise Pareto optimality for both noise models.

Read more

6/21/2024