Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversation Recommender Systems with System- and User-centric Factors
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new evaluation protocol for conversation recommender systems, considering both system-centric and user-centric factors.
- The authors argue that existing evaluation approaches often focus solely on system performance, neglecting the user experience.
- The proposed protocol aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of conversation recommender systems.
Plain English Explanation
Conversation recommender systems are designed to suggest relevant topics or responses during conversations, to make them more engaging and useful. However, existing ways of evaluating these systems often focus only on how well the system performs, without considering how the user actually experiences the recommendations.
The researchers in this paper wanted to create a new evaluation approach that looks at both the technical capabilities of the system and the user's perspective. They argue that a good conversation recommender system needs to not only provide accurate suggestions, but also generate recommendations that users find relevant, coherent, and enjoyable to interact with.
The researchers' new protocol involves assessing factors such as the system's ability to understand context, generate appropriate responses, and maintain a natural flow of conversation. It also evaluates how users perceive the quality, usefulness, and engagement level of the recommendations. By considering both system-focused and user-focused measures, the researchers aim to get a more complete picture of a conversation recommender system's performance and potential for real-world impact.
Technical Explanation
The key elements of the proposed evaluation protocol include:
-
System-centric factors:
- Context understanding: Assessing how well the system comprehends the conversational context to provide relevant recommendations.
- Response generation: Evaluating the system's ability to generate coherent, on-topic responses.
- Conversational flow: Measuring the system's capacity to maintain a natural, engaging flow of dialogue.
-
User-centric factors:
- Perceived quality: Determining how users rate the overall quality of the recommendations.
- Perceived usefulness: Assessing the extent to which users find the recommendations helpful and meaningful.
- User engagement: Evaluating the level of user interest and involvement in the conversation.
The researchers describe a series of experiments and user studies designed to measure these various factors. For example, they may ask users to engage with the conversation recommender system and then provide feedback on the relevance, coherence, and engagement level of the recommendations.
By incorporating both system-focused and user-focused metrics, the proposed evaluation protocol aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of conversation recommender systems, with the goal of guiding the development of systems that not only perform well technically, but also offer a more satisfying and beneficial user experience.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their proposed protocol has some limitations. For instance, they note that user perceptions and preferences can be subjective and may vary across different contexts or user groups. Additionally, the protocol does not address potential ethical concerns, such as the risk of biased or harmful recommendations.
Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as developing more standardized user evaluation methods or investigating the ethical implications of conversation recommender systems. It would also be valuable to test the protocol on a wider range of conversation recommender systems to assess its broader applicability and usefulness.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel evaluation protocol for conversation recommender systems that considers both system-centric and user-centric factors. By taking a more holistic approach to assessment, the researchers aim to drive the development of conversation recommender systems that not only perform well technically, but also provide a more engaging and beneficial user experience. While the protocol has some limitations, it represents an important step towards a more comprehensive and user-focused evaluation of these increasingly prevalent technology systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversation Recommender Systems with System- and User-centric Factors
Chen Huang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Wenqiang Lei, Jiancheng Lv, Tat-Seng Chua
The conversational recommendation system (CRS) has been criticized regarding its user experience in real-world scenarios, despite recent significant progress achieved in academia. Existing evaluation protocols for CRS may prioritize system-centric factors such as effectiveness and fluency in conversation while neglecting user-centric aspects. Thus, we propose a new and inclusive evaluation protocol, Concept, which integrates both system- and user-centric factors. We conceptualise three key characteristics in representing such factors and further divide them into six primary abilities. To implement Concept, we adopt a LLM-based user simulator and evaluator with scoring rubrics that are tailored for each primary ability. Our protocol, Concept, serves a dual purpose. First, it provides an overview of the pros and cons in current CRS models. Second, it pinpoints the problem of low usability in the omnipotent ChatGPT and offers a comprehensive reference guide for evaluating CRS, thereby setting the foundation for CRS improvement.
Read more5/7/2024
💬
0
EventChat: Implementation and user-centric evaluation of a large language model-driven conversational recommender system for exploring leisure events in an SME context
Hannes Kunstmann, Joseph Ollier, Joel Persson, Florian von Wangenheim
Large language models (LLMs) present an enormous evolution in the strategic potential of conversational recommender systems (CRS). Yet to date, research has predominantly focused upon technical frameworks to implement LLM-driven CRS, rather than end-user evaluations or strategic implications for firms, particularly from the perspective of a small to medium enterprises (SME) that makeup the bedrock of the global economy. In the current paper, we detail the design of an LLM-driven CRS in an SME setting, and its subsequent performance in the field using both objective system metrics and subjective user evaluations. While doing so, we additionally outline a short-form revised ResQue model for evaluating LLM-driven CRS, enabling replicability in a rapidly evolving field. Our results reveal good system performance from a user experience perspective (85.5% recommendation accuracy) but underscore latency, cost, and quality issues challenging business viability. Notably, with a median cost of $0.04 per interaction and a latency of 5.7s, cost-effectiveness and response time emerge as crucial areas for achieving a more user-friendly and economically viable LLM-driven CRS for SME settings. One major driver of these costs is the use of an advanced LLM as a ranker within the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technique. Our results additionally indicate that relying solely on approaches such as Prompt-based learning with ChatGPT as the underlying LLM makes it challenging to achieve satisfying quality in a production environment. Strategic considerations for SMEs deploying an LLM-driven CRS are outlined, particularly considering trade-offs in the current technical landscape.
Read more7/10/2024
0
A LLM-based Controllable, Scalable, Human-Involved User Simulator Framework for Conversational Recommender Systems
Lixi Zhu, Xiaowen Huang, Jitao Sang
Conversational Recommender System (CRS) leverages real-time feedback from users to dynamically model their preferences, thereby enhancing the system's ability to provide personalized recommendations and improving the overall user experience. CRS has demonstrated significant promise, prompting researchers to concentrate their efforts on developing user simulators that are both more realistic and trustworthy. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has marked the onset of a new epoch in computational capabilities, exhibiting human-level intelligence in various tasks. Research efforts have been made to utilize LLMs for building user simulators to evaluate the performance of CRS. Although these efforts showcase innovation, they are accompanied by certain limitations. In this work, we introduce a Controllable, Scalable, and Human-Involved (CSHI) simulator framework that manages the behavior of user simulators across various stages via a plugin manager. CSHI customizes the simulation of user behavior and interactions to provide a more lifelike and convincing user interaction experience. Through experiments and case studies in two conversational recommendation scenarios, we show that our framework can adapt to a variety of conversational recommendation settings and effectively simulate users' personalized preferences. Consequently, our simulator is able to generate feedback that closely mirrors that of real users. This facilitates a reliable assessment of existing CRS studies and promotes the creation of high-quality conversational recommendation datasets.
Read more5/15/2024
⚙️
0
Navigating User Experience of ChatGPT-based Conversational Recommender Systems: The Effects of Prompt Guidance and Recommendation Domain
Yizhe Zhang, Yucheng Jin, Li Chen, Ting Yang
Conversational recommender systems (CRS) enable users to articulate their preferences and provide feedback through natural language. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), the potential to enhance user engagement with CRS and augment the recommendation process with LLM-generated content has received increasing attention. However, the efficacy of LLM-powered CRS is contingent upon the use of prompts, and the subjective perception of recommendation quality can differ across various recommendation domains. Therefore, we have developed a ChatGPT-based CRS to investigate the impact of these two factors, prompt guidance (PG) and recommendation domain (RD), on the overall user experience of the system. We conducted an online empirical study (N = 100) by employing a mixed-method approach that utilized a between-subjects design for the variable of PG (with vs. without) and a within-subjects design for RD (book recommendations vs. job recommendations). The findings reveal that PG can substantially enhance the system's explainability, adaptability, perceived ease of use, and transparency. Moreover, users are inclined to perceive a greater sense of novelty and demonstrate a higher propensity to engage with and try recommended items in the context of book recommendations as opposed to job recommendations. Furthermore, the influence of PG on certain user experience metrics and interactive behaviors appears to be modulated by the recommendation domain, as evidenced by the interaction effects between the two examined factors. This work contributes to the user-centered evaluation of ChatGPT-based CRS by investigating two prominent factors and offers practical design guidance.
Read more5/24/2024