Conditional Bayesian Quadrature

Read original: arXiv:2406.16530 - Published 6/26/2024 by Zonghao Chen, Masha Naslidnyk, Arthur Gretton, Franc{c}ois-Xavier Briol

Overview

This paper introduces a new method called "Conditional Bayesian Quadrature" for efficiently integrating high-dimensional functions.
The method combines Bayesian quadrature with conditioning on a set of evaluations of the function, allowing for more accurate and efficient integration compared to existing methods.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark problems and show that it outperforms standard Bayesian quadrature.

Plain English Explanation

Integrating, or "adding up," high-dimensional functions is a common problem in many fields, such as physics, finance, and machine learning. However, this can be computationally expensive, especially for complex functions with many variables.

The authors of this paper propose a new technique called "Conditional Bayesian Quadrature" to make this integration process more efficient. The key idea is to use information about the function's behavior at certain points (called "evaluations") to help guide the integration process. This allows the method to achieve more accurate results with fewer function evaluations, which can save a significant amount of computational time.

The authors demonstrate that their approach outperforms standard Bayesian quadrature, which is a popular existing method for high-dimensional integration. This suggests that Conditional Bayesian Quadrature could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on problems that involve integrating complex, high-dimensional functions, such as those found in Bayesian inference or optimization under uncertainty.

Technical Explanation

The authors' Conditional Bayesian Quadrature method builds upon the standard Bayesian quadrature approach, which models the function to be integrated as a Gaussian process and then uses this model to estimate the integral. In the conditional variant, the authors incorporate additional information about the function by conditioning the Gaussian process model on a set of function evaluations.

This conditioning step allows the method to better capture the function's behavior, particularly in regions where evaluations have been made. The authors show that this leads to more accurate and efficient integration compared to standard Bayesian quadrature, which does not take advantage of these conditional evaluations.

Mathematically, the authors derive the necessary expressions for computing the conditional mean and variance of the Gaussian process model, which are then used to estimate the integral. They also provide theoretical analyses of the method's convergence properties and demonstrate its effectiveness on a range of benchmark problems.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the Conditional Bayesian Quadrature method is that it requires the user to specify the locations of the function evaluations used for conditioning. While the authors provide guidelines for choosing these locations, the optimal strategy may depend on the specific problem at hand. Further research could explore adaptive or automated methods for selecting the conditioning points to make the approach more user-friendly.

Additionally, the authors' experiments focus on relatively low-dimensional problems (up to 10 dimensions). It would be interesting to see how the method scales to higher-dimensional settings, which are often more challenging for integration techniques. The authors acknowledge this as a potential area for future work, as well as exploring extensions to other types of surrogate models beyond Gaussian processes.

Overall, the Conditional Bayesian Quadrature method appears to be a promising approach for improving the efficiency of high-dimensional integration tasks. The authors have provided a solid theoretical foundation and empirical validation, which should encourage further research and development in this direction.

Conclusion

The Conditional Bayesian Quadrature method introduced in this paper offers a new way to tackle the challenge of efficiently integrating high-dimensional functions. By incorporating information about the function's behavior at specific points, the method can achieve more accurate and efficient integration compared to standard Bayesian quadrature.

This advancement could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from physics and finance to machine learning and Bayesian inference, where high-dimensional integration is a crucial component. As the authors suggest, further research is needed to explore the scalability and adaptability of the method, but the current work provides a strong foundation for continued advancements in this important area of computational science.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Conditional Bayesian Quadrature

Zonghao Chen, Masha Naslidnyk, Arthur Gretton, Franc{c}ois-Xavier Briol

We propose a novel approach for estimating conditional or parametric expectations in the setting where obtaining samples or evaluating integrands is costly. Through the framework of probabilistic numerical methods (such as Bayesian quadrature), our novel approach allows to incorporates prior information about the integrands especially the prior smoothness knowledge about the integrands and the conditional expectation. As a result, our approach provides a way of quantifying uncertainty and leads to a fast convergence rate, which is confirmed both theoretically and empirically on challenging tasks in Bayesian sensitivity analysis, computational finance and decision making under uncertainty.

6/26/2024

Bayesian meta learning for trustworthy uncertainty quantification

Zhenyuan Yuan, Thinh T. Doan

We consider the problem of Bayesian regression with trustworthy uncertainty quantification. We define that the uncertainty quantification is trustworthy if the ground truth can be captured by intervals dependent on the predictive distributions with a pre-specified probability. Furthermore, we propose, Trust-Bayes, a novel optimization framework for Bayesian meta learning which is cognizant of trustworthy uncertainty quantification without explicit assumptions on the prior model/distribution of the functions. We characterize the lower bounds of the probabilities of the ground truth being captured by the specified intervals and analyze the sample complexity with respect to the feasible probability for trustworthy uncertainty quantification. Monte Carlo simulation of a case study using Gaussian process regression is conducted for verification and comparison with the Meta-prior algorithm.

7/30/2024

A Functional Model Method for Nonconvex Nonsmooth Conditional Stochastic Optimization

Andrzej Ruszczy'nski, Shangzhe Yang

We consider stochastic optimization problems involving an expected value of a nonlinear function of a base random vector and a conditional expectation of another function depending on the base random vector, a dependent random vector, and the decision variables. We call such problems conditional stochastic optimization problems. They arise in many applications, such as uplift modeling, reinforcement learning, and contextual optimization. We propose a specialized single time-scale stochastic method for nonconvex constrained conditional stochastic optimization problems with a Lipschitz smooth outer function and a generalized differentiable inner function. In the method, we approximate the inner conditional expectation with a rich parametric model whose mean squared error satisfies a stochastic version of a {L}ojasiewicz condition. The model is used by an inner learning algorithm. The main feature of our approach is that unbiased stochastic estimates of the directions used by the method can be generated with one observation from the joint distribution per iteration, which makes it applicable to real-time learning. The directions, however, are not gradients or subgradients of any overall objective function. We prove the convergence of the method with probability one, using the method of differential inclusions and a specially designed Lyapunov function, involving a stochastic generalization of the Bregman distance. Finally, a numerical illustration demonstrates the viability of our approach.

5/20/2024

🛠️

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

6/21/2024