Conference Submission and Review Policies to Foster Responsible Computing Research

Overview

• This report outlines guidelines for ethical and responsible research practices in computing conferences.
• Key areas include avoiding harm, responsible vulnerability disclosure, ethics board review, obtaining consent, accurate reporting, managing financial conflicts of interest, and the use of generative AI.
• The report emphasizes the need for conference organizers to adopt clear policies to ensure responsible computing research and publication.
• These guidelines are evolving as understanding and practices in the field advance.

Plain English Explanation

The report provides a set of recommendations to help computing conferences ensure their research is conducted and published in an ethical and responsible manner. The guidelines cover important areas like avoiding harm to research participants, responsibly disclosing software vulnerabilities, obtaining proper consent from people involved, and accurately reporting research findings.

Conference organizers are encouraged to develop clear policies around these issues to promote responsible computing research and publication. For example, they may require all studies to be reviewed by an ethics board before acceptance. The report notes that these guidelines will need to evolve as norms and best practices in this area continue to develop, such as around the use of generative AI in research.

The overall goal is to help ensure computing research conducted and shared at conferences prioritizes ethical behavior, minimizes potential harms, and maintains the integrity of the scientific process.

Technical Explanation

The report outlines a set of guidelines for ethical and responsible research practices that should be adopted by computing conference organizers. These guidelines cover key areas such as:

• Avoiding Harm: Ensuring research does not cause physical, psychological, social, or other harms to participants or others affected by the work.
• Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure: Establishing processes for responsibly disclosing software vulnerabilities discovered during research.
• Ethics Board Review: Requiring all studies to undergo review by an independent ethics board before acceptance.
• Obtaining Consent: Ensuring proper informed consent is obtained from all research participants.
• Accurate Reporting: Promoting honest and transparent reporting of research methods and findings.
• Managing Conflicts of Interest: Policies to identify and manage financial or other conflicts of interest.
• Use of Generative AI: Guidance on the ethical and responsible use of generative AI systems in research.

The report emphasizes that conference organizers should develop and enforce clear policies in these areas to uphold high standards of responsible computing research and publication. It also notes that these guidelines will need to evolve over time as understanding and best practices in this space continue to develop.

Critical Analysis

The report provides a comprehensive and thoughtful set of guidelines for promoting ethical and responsible practices in computing research conferences. The recommendations cover a range of important issues that are critical for maintaining the integrity of the scientific process and ensuring potential harms are minimized.

One potential limitation is that the guidelines may need to be adapted to the specific contexts and norms of different computing sub-fields. What constitutes "responsible" practice could vary across areas like security research, human-computer interaction, or AI development. The report acknowledges this challenge and emphasizes the need for ongoing refinement of the guidelines.

Additionally, the report does not delve deeply into the practical challenges of implementing and enforcing these policies at the conference level. Conference organizers may face resource constraints, resistance from some researchers, or difficulties in consistently applying subjective ethical principles. Further guidance on overcoming such hurdles could strengthen the report's usefulness.

Overall, this report represents an important step in defining clear ethical standards for the computing research community. By encouraging conferences to adopt responsible practices, it has the potential to drive positive change and help ensure computing innovations create more benefit than harm.

Conclusion

This report provides a valuable set of guidelines to help computing conference organizers uphold high standards of ethical and responsible research practices. By addressing critical issues like avoiding harm, ensuring proper consent and disclosure, and managing conflicts of interest, the recommendations aim to maintain the integrity of the scientific process and mitigate potential negative impacts.

As the field of computing continues to rapidly evolve, particularly with the rise of powerful technologies like generative AI, these guidelines will need to evolve as well. But this report establishes an important foundation for the community to build upon, contributing to the responsible development and application of computing research for the benefit of society.