A University Framework for the Responsible use of Generative AI in Research
2404.19244
0
0
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (generative AI) poses both opportunities and risks for the integrity of research. Universities must guide researchers in using generative AI responsibly, and in navigating a complex regulatory landscape subject to rapid change. By drawing on the experiences of two Australian universities, we propose a framework to help institutions promote and facilitate the responsible use of generative AI. We provide guidance to help distil the diverse regulatory environment into a principles-based position statement. Further, we explain how a position statement can then serve as a foundation for initiatives in training, communications, infrastructure, and process change. Despite the growing body of literature about AI's impact on academic integrity for undergraduate students, there has been comparatively little attention on the impacts of generative AI for research integrity, and the vital role of institutions in helping to address those challenges. This paper underscores the urgency for research institutions to take action in this area and suggests a practical and adaptable framework for so doing.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a framework for the responsible use of generative AI in university research
- Discusses the need to balance the benefits of generative AI with potential risks and harms
- Outlines key principles and guidelines to help universities navigate the responsible development and deployment of generative AI
Plain English Explanation
This paper introduces a framework to help universities use generative AI responsibly in their research. Generative AI is a powerful technology that can create new text, images, and other content, but it also carries risks like producing biased or harmful outputs. The authors argue that universities need to carefully consider these potential harms as they adopt and use generative AI.
The framework lays out key principles and guidelines to assist universities in developing and deploying generative AI systems in an ethical and responsible manner. This includes considerations around copyright, trustworthiness, and anticipating societal impacts. The goal is to help universities harness the benefits of generative AI while mitigating potential harms to research integrity, individual privacy, and public trust.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for the responsible use of generative AI in university research. It outlines key principles and guidelines to assist universities in navigating the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
The framework is structured around four main pillars:
- Governance and Oversight: Establishing clear policies, procedures, and accountability measures for the use of generative AI.
- Responsible Development: Ensuring generative AI systems are developed with robust safeguards and tested for potential harms.
- Ethical Use: Implementing guidelines for the ethical application of generative AI in research, including considerations around authorship, copyright, and privacy.
- Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement: Promoting open communication and collaboration with diverse stakeholders to build trust and address societal concerns.
The authors emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach, drawing on expertise from fields like law, ethics, and social sciences to anticipate and mitigate the risks associated with generative AI. They also highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and adjustment as these technologies continue to evolve.
Critical Analysis
The framework presented in this paper is a timely and necessary contribution to the responsible development and use of generative AI in university research. The authors rightly acknowledge the significant benefits that these technologies can offer, but also the potential for harm if not deployed thoughtfully and with appropriate safeguards.
One potential limitation of the framework is its broad, high-level nature. While this allows for flexibility in implementation across diverse university contexts, it may lack the specificity needed to address some of the more complex, nuanced challenges that institutions may face. Further research and practical guidance on how to operationalize these principles would be valuable.
Additionally, the framework could be strengthened by more explicitly addressing the potential for generative AI to exacerbate existing biases and inequities, both within the research process and in the applications of the technology. Strategies for proactively identifying and mitigating these risks should be a key consideration.
Overall, this paper provides a solid foundation for universities to build upon as they navigate the responsible use of generative AI. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and a commitment to ongoing learning and improvement will be essential to ensuring these powerful technologies are harnessed in service of the public good.
Conclusion
This paper offers a timely and comprehensive framework to guide universities in the responsible development and use of generative AI in research. By outlining key principles and guidelines across governance, responsible development, ethical use, and stakeholder engagement, the authors provide a roadmap for institutions to harness the benefits of these technologies while proactively addressing potential risks and harms.
As generative AI continues to advance, this framework can serve as a valuable resource to help universities uphold research integrity, protect individual privacy, and maintain public trust. Implementing these practices will be crucial to ensuring the responsible integration of generative AI into the academic research ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Responsible Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education: Developing a Points to Consider Approach Based on Faculty Perspectives
Ravit Dotan, Lisa S. Parker, John G. Radzilowicz
0
0
This paper proposes an approach to the responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education, employing a ''points to consider'' approach that is sensitive to the goals, values, and structural features of higher education. Higher education's ethos of collaborative faculty governance, pedagogical and research goals, and embrace of academic freedom conflict, the paper argues, with centralized top down approaches to governing AI that are common in the private sector. The paper is based on a semester long effort at the University of Pittsburgh which gathered and organized perspectives on generative AI in higher education through a collaborative, iterative, interdisciplinary process that included recurring group discussions, three standalone focus groups, and an informal survey. The paper presents insights drawn from this effort that give rise to the ''points to consider'' approach the paper develops. These insights include the benefits and risks of potential uses of generative AI In higher education, as well as barriers to its adoption, and culminate in the six normative points to consider when adopting and governing generative AI in institutions of higher education.
6/5/2024
Responsible Generative AI: What to Generate and What Not
Jindong Gu
0
0
In recent years, generative AI (GenAI), like large language models and text-to-image models, has received significant attention across various domains. However, ensuring the responsible generation of content by these models is crucial for their real-world applicability. This raises an interesting question: textit{What should responsible GenAI generate, and what should it not?} To answer the question, this paper investigates the practical responsible requirements of both textual and visual generative models, outlining five key considerations: generating truthful content, avoiding toxic content, refusing harmful instruction, leaking no training data-related content, and ensuring generated content identifiable. Specifically, we review recent advancements and challenges in addressing these requirements. Besides, we discuss and emphasize the importance of responsible GenAI across healthcare, education, finance, and artificial general intelligence domains. Through a unified perspective on both textual and visual generative models, this paper aims to provide insights into practical safety-related issues and further benefit the community in building responsible GenAI.
4/10/2024
🤖
The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar
0
0
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
7/1/2024
🔍
Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies
Johannes Schneider, Rene Abraham, Christian Meske
0
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), specifically large language models like ChatGPT, has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance, encompassing technical and business perspectives. Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of developing a framework for GenAI governance within companies. This framework outlines the scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms tailored to harness business opportunities as well as mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. Our research contributes a focused approach to GenAI governance, offering practical insights for companies navigating the challenges of GenAI adoption and highlighting research gaps.
6/11/2024