Configuration Space Distance Fields for Manipulation Planning
0
🤯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a rebuttal to the reviews received for a previously submitted research paper.
- The authors express gratitude for the constructive feedback and indicate they have made significant changes to the manuscript, which are highlighted in blue.
- The rebuttal aims to address all minor concerns and provide clarification on the key points raised by the reviewers and area chair.
Plain English Explanation
The authors of this research paper have received feedback from reviewers and an area chair. They are thankful for the insightful and helpful comments, which have encouraged them to revise their manuscript. The authors have made several changes to address the reviewers' concerns, and these changes are marked in blue throughout the text.
The goal of this rebuttal is to respond to all the minor issues raised by the reviewers and the area chair, and to provide additional clarification on the important aspects of the research. The authors want to ensure the reviewers and area chair understand the key points and the significance of their work.
Technical Explanation
The paper does not provide the technical details of the research itself, as it is focused on the rebuttal and response to the reviewers. The rebuttal aims to address the concerns raised by the reviewers and the area chair, and to highlight the changes made to the manuscript in the revised version.
Critical Analysis
Since this document is a rebuttal rather than the original research paper, there is no in-depth critical analysis provided. The authors are primarily focused on responding to the feedback received and explaining the revisions they have made to the manuscript.
Conclusion
This rebuttal provides the authors' response to the feedback received from the reviewers and area chair for their previously submitted research paper. The authors express gratitude for the constructive comments and indicate they have made significant changes to the manuscript to address the concerns raised. The goal of this rebuttal is to ensure the reviewers and area chair understand the key points and the importance of the research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
0
Configuration Space Distance Fields for Manipulation Planning
Yiming Li, Xuemin Chi, Amirreza Razmjoo, Sylvain Calinon
The signed distance field is a popular implicit shape representation in robotics, providing geometric information about objects and obstacles in a form that can easily be combined with control, optimization and learning techniques. Most often, SDFs are used to represent distances in task space, which corresponds to the familiar notion of distances that we perceive in our 3D world. However, SDFs can mathematically be used in other spaces, including robot configuration spaces. For a robot manipulator, this configuration space typically corresponds to the joint angles for each articulation of the robot. While it is customary in robot planning to express which portions of the configuration space are free from collision with obstacles, it is less common to think of this information as a distance field in the configuration space. In this paper, we demonstrate the potential of considering SDFs in the robot configuration space for optimization, which we call the configuration space distance field. Similarly to the use of SDF in task space, CDF provides an efficient joint angle distance query and direct access to the derivatives. Most approaches split the overall computation with one part in task space followed by one part in configuration space. Instead, CDF allows the implicit structure to be leveraged by control, optimization, and learning problems in a unified manner. In particular, we propose an efficient algorithm to compute and fuse CDFs that can be generalized to arbitrary scenes. A corresponding neural CDF representation using multilayer perceptrons is also presented to obtain a compact and continuous representation while improving computation efficiency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CDF with planar obstacle avoidance examples and with a 7-axis Franka robot in inverse kinematics and manipulation planning tasks.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Exploring Probabilistic Distance Fields in Robotics
Lan Wu
The success of intelligent robotic missions relies on integrating various research tasks, each demanding distinct representations. Designing task-specific representations for each task is costly and impractical. Unified representations suitable for multiple tasks remain unexplored. My outline introduces a series of research outcomes of GP-based probabilistic distance field (GPDF) representation that mathematically models the fundamental property of Euclidean distance field (EDF) along with gradients, surface normals and dense reconstruction. The progress to date and ongoing future works show that GPDF has the potential to offer a unified solution of representation for multiple tasks such as localisation, mapping, motion planning, obstacle avoidance, grasping, human-robot collaboration, and dense visualisation. I believe that GPDF serves as the cornerstone for robots to accomplish more complex and challenging tasks. By leveraging GPDF, robots can navigate through intricate environments, understand spatial relationships, and interact with objects and humans seamlessly.
Read more5/30/2024
🌿
0
Probabilistic Directed Distance Fields for Ray-Based Shape Representations
Tristan Aumentado-Armstrong, Stavros Tsogkas, Sven Dickinson, Allan Jepson
In modern computer vision, the optimal representation of 3D shape continues to be task-dependent. One fundamental operation applied to such representations is differentiable rendering, as it enables inverse graphics approaches in learning frameworks. Standard explicit shape representations (voxels, point clouds, or meshes) are often easily rendered, but can suffer from limited geometric fidelity, among other issues. On the other hand, implicit representations (occupancy, distance, or radiance fields) preserve greater fidelity, but suffer from complex or inefficient rendering processes, limiting scalability. In this work, we devise Directed Distance Fields (DDFs), a novel neural shape representation that builds upon classical distance fields. The fundamental operation in a DDF maps an oriented point (position and direction) to surface visibility and depth. This enables efficient differentiable rendering, obtaining depth with a single forward pass per pixel, as well as differential geometric quantity extraction (e.g., surface normals), with only additional backward passes. Using probabilistic DDFs (PDDFs), we show how to model inherent discontinuities in the underlying field. We then apply DDFs to several applications, including single-shape fitting, generative modelling, and single-image 3D reconstruction, showcasing strong performance with simple architectural components via the versatility of our representation. Finally, since the dimensionality of DDFs permits view-dependent geometric artifacts, we conduct a theoretical investigation of the constraints necessary for view consistency. We find a small set of field properties that are sufficient to guarantee a DDF is consistent, without knowing, for instance, which shape the field is expressing.
Read more4/16/2024
0
ContactSDF: Signed Distance Functions as Multi-Contact Models for Dexterous Manipulation
Wen Yang, Wanxin Jin
In this paper, we propose ContactSDF, a method that uses signed distance functions (SDFs) to approximate multi-contact models, including both collision detection and time-stepping routines. ContactSDF first establishes an SDF using the supporting plane representation of an object for collision detection, and then use the generated contact dual cones to build a second SDF for time stepping prediction of the next state. Those two SDFs create a differentiable and closed-form multi-contact dynamic model for state prediction, enabling efficient model learning and optimization for contact-rich manipulation. We perform extensive simulation experiments to show the effectiveness of ContactSDF for model learning and real-time control of dexterous manipulation. We further evaluate the ContactSDF on a hardware Allegro hand for on-palm reorientation tasks. Results show with around 2 minutes of learning on hardware, the ContactSDF achieves high-quality dexterous manipulation at a frequency of 30-60Hz.
Read more8/20/2024